![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1492596
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Peer tutoring has been increasingly used to support university sonography teaching, necessitating well-qualified tutors. This study aims to evaluate the quality of a training program for sonography peer tutors developed and implemented at a university hospital.Materials and Methods: A training program consisting of eleven modules was developed and subsequently evaluated for success with two subjective and two objective assessments of peer-tutoring quality. The two subjective assessments measured subjective scores of the peer tutors' specialist and didactic skills using a Likert scale (1 = very low; 7 = very high) from the perspective of the individuals the peer tutor taught (assessment 1) and from the peer tutors themselves (assessment 2). The peer tutors also rated the training concept itself. The objective assessments evaluated the peer tutors' specialist skills with a theoretical test (assessment 3) and a practical examination (assessment 4). Data collection for assessment 1 began in 2017, while data for assessments 2 to 4 were collected from 2021-2024.Results: A total of 2980 data sets for assessment 1, 92 data sets for 2, 44 data sets for assessment 3, and 147 data sets for assessment 4 were included in the analysis. Peer tutors scored highly positively on assessments 1 (6.6 ± 0.63 scale points [SP]) and 2 (5.53 ± 0.63 SP), and these results remained consistently high throughout the semesters. Assessments 3 (74.7 ±7.9%) and 4 (85.6 ±10.5%) also showed strongly positive values that remained constant over time. Assessment 1 results were significantly higher than the others (p<0.01.), while no significant differences were found between assessments 2, 3, and 4.Conclusion: The data indicate that the training concept developed established and maintained high-quality peer-tutor training throughout the reviewed semesters. Future efforts should promote the development of national and international standards for peer-tutor training and provide certification opportunities for peer tutors.
Keywords: peer-assisted learning, Peer-tutoring, undergraduate ultrasound education, Peer tutors, sonography curriculum
Received: 07 Sep 2024; Accepted: 14 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Weimer, Yilmaz, Ille, Weinmann-Menke, Müller, Büchner, Buggenhagen, Stäuber, Neubauer, Winte, Weimer, Dirks, Künzel, Rink, Dionysopoulou, Lorenz, Kloeckner, Schiestl and Recker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Johannes Weimer, Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.