
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1480273
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Healthcare Professions Education: 2024 View all 14 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The emergency department (ED), usually deemed not the most frequent setting for palliative care (PC), has increasingly been mentioned for its potential critical role in end-of-life patient care. However, how the training affects PC performance remains to be investigated. This study aims to investigate the current PC standard of care and effectiveness of PC training in a Chinese emergency care medical consortium hospital. Methods We conducted an anonymous online census targeting the emergency care providers in the consortium hospital. The questionnaire included respondents' demographics, PC knowledge, PC practice, and whether they have received any PC training. Outcome variables included: confidence in clinical implementation, perceptions about death, and attitudes toward PC implementation with Likert five score rating. Factors associated with better PC knowledge and performance were identified by analysis of the association between rating scores and participant characteristics. Results 923 staff participated in the study, while 429 (46.5%) received PC training. Training participation was significantly associated with age, education, occupation, rank, working years, and experience of family members' death (P<0.05). Training improved the total score of knowledge and practice of PC (median 90 vs. 100, P<0.001), the confidence in clinical PC management (confidence score: 36 vs. 40, P<0.001), and attitudes towards PC implementation (attitude score: 37 vs. 40, P=0.048).Offline lecture-based learning was the primary training form in this hospital. The ORs of case-based learning, online lecture video, and community training project to higher total scores were 1.94 (95% CI 1.18-3.17, P=0.009), 2.09 (1.23-3.56, P=0.006) and 0.17 (0.04-0.63, P=0.008), respectively. Meanwhile, cased-based learning, online lecture video, and community training project contributed significantly to the confidence score. So did the lecture offline to the score of perception about death (perception score). The OR of meeting online to attitude score was 1.69(1.05-2.73, P=0.030).Palliative care training is associated with better self-rating of PC among ED care providers. However, there is a significant gap for improvement, particularly for the community training programs.
Keywords: Palliative Care, Cross-sectional study, Current situation, emergency department, Medical Education
Received: 13 Aug 2024; Accepted: 11 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zong, Jiang, ZHU, Liu, Xu, Ning, Li, Gao, Li, Shi and Rao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Di Shi, Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Xin Rao, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.