The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Pulmonary Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1467871
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in the Management of Lung Cancer: From the Bench to the Bedside and Back View all 10 articles
Previous treatment decreases efficacy of pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
Provisionally accepted- 1 Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China
- 2 Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- 3 Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
Background: Pralsetinib is a selective RET inhibitor. The ARROW trial revealed that RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can benefit from pralsetinib with tolerable adverse events (AEs). However, the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in real world has rarely been reported. Materials and Methods: This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients between March 2021 and December 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by a Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. A Cox regression model was performed to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled, and the median follow-up time was 18.1 months. The objective response rate and disease control rate of the whole cohort were 57.2% and 71.4%, respectively, and the median PFS and OS were 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-13.2) and 13.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-24.8), respectively. Baseline characteristics of the treatment naive group and pre-treated group were listed. The median PFS tended to be better in treatment naive group (18.3 vs. 8.0 months, P=0.067), while the median OS were similar between the two groups (28.4 vs. 11.6 months, P=0.308). Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of 2 had worse median PFS comparing with those with ECOG PS score of 0-1 (3.8 vs. 12.6 months, P=0.004). Besides, patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) also revealed worse median PFS (8.0 vs. 18.6 months, P=0.023) comparing with those without previous PBC. Furthermore, patients previously treated with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody or multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) showed worse median OS compared with those without previous anti-PD-1 antibody (5.0 vs. 22.0 months, P=0.002) or MKIs (6.2 vs. 28.4 months, P=0.015). The most common AEs was increased aspartate aminotransferase (39.3%). Conclusion: Pralsetinib was effective in RET fusion-positive NSCLC with tolerable AEs in real-world practice. Efficacy of pralsetinib was decreased in patients previously treated with PBC, immunotherapy, or MKIs.
Keywords: RET fusion, non-small-cell lung cancer, Pralsetinib, Survival outcomes, prognostic factors
Received: 21 Jul 2024; Accepted: 02 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, You, He, Hou, Li, Li, Jiang, Yi, Xia and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Liangping Xia, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.