Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Med.
Sec. Rheumatology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1522736
This article is part of the Research Topic Updates on Giant Cell Arteritis: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment- Volume II View all 11 articles

Editorial: Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Giant Cell Arteritis Diagnostics and Management

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Infectious Diseases, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
  • 2 Department of Rheumatology, Esbjerg, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The role of temporal artery biopsy (TAB), while debated, remains pivotal in diagnosing cranial GCA. Stamatis et al. (2024) underscore its continued importance despite the rise of imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET). TAB has high specificity for cranial GCA, though its sensitivity can vary, particularly in patients with large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA). Specimen length, number of sections, and biopsy timing (preferably within two weeks of starting glucocorticoids) influence TAB's diagnostic yield.Although imaging techniques have improved, Stamatis et al. underscore that TAB is essential for differentiating healed arteritis from age-related atherosclerosis, which can be diagnostically challenging. Thus, TAB continues to play a role in diagnosing cranial GCA, especially when imaging results are unclear. US has emerged as a noninvasive alternative to TAB for diagnosing GCA, mainly through the halo sign, which may indicate temporal artery inflammation. In a landmark study by Haaversen et al. (2024), ultrasound was critical for diagnosis and follow-up, though its sensitivity for relapse detection was only 61.2%. To improve monitoring, Haaversen introduced the GCA Activity Score (GCAS), which integrates ultrasound, clinical symptoms, and inflammatory markers like CRP, proving helpful in detecting subclinical relapses. PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have demonstrated value in identifying LV-GCA, where inflammation extends beyond cranial vessels. Gorlen et al. (2024) showed that PET is particularly effective for excluding malignancies in patients with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or GCA.A retrospective cohort study by Andel et al. (2023) using the updated 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria found that mixed-GCA (cranial and large-vessel involvement) was the most common phenotype, supporting the use of advanced imaging to identify and classify GCA subtypes more effectively. GCA presents with diverse clinical phenotypes, complicating the diagnostic process. The classic cranial GCA is characterized by headache, jaw claudication, and vision problems, while LV-GCA manifests more subtly, with systemic symptoms like fever and weight loss. Skaug et al. (2023) found that patients with non-cranial GCA experienced longer diagnostic delays than those with cranial involvement.These findings suggest the importance of regularly imaging non-cranial arteries in suspected GCA cases, especially in younger patients, to avoid diagnostic delays. Given that non-cranial GCA patients are often underdiagnosed, prompt imaging can reduce the risk of complications such as aortic aneurysms and stroke, as supported by Ayo-Martin et al. (2023), who found that vertebral vasculitis is significantly associated with increased stroke risk. Relapses in GCA remain a primary clinical concern, with rates as high as 60.6%, as Haaversen et al. ( 2024)noted. Contrary to earlier beliefs, relapses occur at similar rates across cranial, large-vessel, and mixed subtypes, underscoring the need for consistent monitoring.The GCA Activity Score (GCAS), which combines clinical, biochemical, and imaging data, has emerged as an essential tool for identifying subclinical relapses that might otherwise go undetected.In cases where ultrasound is inconclusive, Monti et al. ( 2023) highlight the complementary value of PET and MRI, particularly for monitoring large-vessel involvement. These imaging techniques are essential in capturing ongoing inflammation in patients who remain asymptomatic yet have active disease. Complications from untreated or inadequately managed GCA can be severe, including sight loss, stroke, and aortic aneurysms. Ayo-Martin et al. ( 2023) introduced a novel method of using vertebral artery diameter measured via ultrasound to indicate vertebral vasculitis, which is associated with an increased risk of stroke. 2023) also highlighted traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as age, smoking, and hypertension as the strongest predictors of mortality in GCA patients. Interestingly, their long-term study found no significant increase in cancer incidence among GCA patients, suggesting that routine cancer screening may not be necessary. Beyond its physical complications, GCA imposes a significant psychological burden. In a cross-sectional study by Froehlich et al. ( 2023), 40% of GCA patients were found to suffer from major depressive disorder. The study also found a strong correlation between elevated CRP levels and depressive symptoms, suggesting that systemic inflammation may contribute to mental health impairment in GCA patients. These findings underscore the importance of integrating mental health assessments into the routine care of GCA patients, especially considering the potential link between inflammatory markers and psychological distress. While glucocorticoids remain the cornerstone of GCA treatment, their long-term use is associated with significant side effects, including osteoporosis, diabetes, and increased infection risk. Biologic therapies, such as tocilizumab, offer a targeted approach to reducing inflammation while sparing patients from glucocorticoid-related side effects. Pankow et al.(2023) reported promising results using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as a steroid-sparing therapy for GCA, significantly reducing CRP levels and disease remission in a small cohort.These findings pave the way for future randomized controlled trials to establish MMF's role in the broader treatment landscape for GCA.In addition, glucocorticoids reduce the sensitivity of various diagnostic methods. Stamatis et al. (2024) emphasize that TAB should ideally be performed before initiating glucocorticoids to preserve diagnostic accuracy. GCA remains a complex condition that requires a dynamic approach to diagnosis and management. The combined use of advanced imaging and the GCAS represents a significant step forward in diagnosing, monitoring, and managing GCA. Haaversen et al. (2024) and Monti et al. (2023) emphasize the importance of a multimodal approach that includes imaging to track disease progression and detect relapses. The use of steroid-sparing therapies such as mycophenolate mofetil and the focus on personalized care is transforming the landscape of GCA. In the future, treatment will be tailored to each patient's unique disease characteristics, ensuring optimal outcomes while minimizing complications.

    Keywords: GCA, imaging, outcomes, Treatment, Relapse /Refractory

    Received: 04 Nov 2024; Accepted: 18 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Diamantopoulos and Chrysidis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Andreas P P Diamantopoulos, Infectious Diseases, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, 4604, Norway

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.