The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1507515
This article is part of the Research Topic Health Professions Education at a Time of Triple Planetary Crises View all 8 articles
Planetary health education in undergraduate medical education in Germany: Results from structured interviews and an online survey within the national PlanetMedEd study
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- 2 Center for Preventive Medicine Baden-Württemberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- 3 Institute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany, Würzburg, Germany
- 4 CARES Institute, Heidelberg, Germany
In light of the accumulating evidence, awareness and urgency to act upon the three planetary crisesclimate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution -the concept of Planetary Health underscores their profound implications for health and promotes actionable solutions to advance both wellbeing and ecological sustainability. Despite (inter)national calls to integrate Planetary Health into health workers' curricula, the current status of Planetary Health Education in undergraduate medical education in Germany is unclear. This study therefore aimed (a) to assess the current implementation of Planetary Health in undergraduate medical education in Germany and (b) to explore its characteristics as a foundation to develop evidence-informed recommendations for mainstreaming Planetary Health Education in medical schools in Germany.The study comprised structured interviews followed by an online survey, both targeting all 39 medical schools in Germany. In 2021, structured interviews were conducted with students, educators and deanery staff at medical schools. In 2023, educators and deanery staff participated in an online survey based on the findings from the interviews.In total, 80% of the 39 medical schools participated in the interviews, while 90% took part in the online survey. Based on integrated findings, 35 medical schools (90%) offered Planetary Health Education, with a median of two educational activities, including both stand-alone courses and lectures integrated into other courses. Despite an overall increase since winter semester 2021/2022, most educational activities were electives and not part of the mandatory curriculum. Innovative educational approaches and learning objectives differed significantly between mandatory and elective formats. In contrast to mandatory educational activities, student involvement was reported for the majority of electives and was significantly associated with transformative learning objectives.Despite a steady rise in teaching activities, mandatory Planetary Health Education remains insufficiently integrated into undergraduate medical education in Germany. Key criteria defining Planetary Health Education, such as innovative educational approaches, practical skills, and transformative learning, were primarily reflected in electives, which reach only a minority of students. To adequately equip the future healthcare workforce, the current barriers to successfully integrating Planetary Health into medical education must be systematically addressed and overcome.
Keywords: Planetary health, climate change and health, Health Professions Education, Planetary Health education, Medical schools, curriculum development, education for sustainable health care, One Health
Received: 07 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Grieco, Parisi, Simmenroth, Eichinger, Zirkel, König, Jünger, Geck and Schwienhorst-Stich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Eva-Maria Schwienhorst-Stich, Department of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.