Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1486636

Diagnostic accuracy of Lung Ultrasound to predict weaning outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Zhiyang Zhang Zhiyang Zhang 1Li Guo Li Guo 2Huawei Wang Huawei Wang 1Ze Zhang Ze Zhang 1Limin Shen Limin Shen 1Heling Zhao Heling Zhao 1*
  • 1 Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, China., Shijiazhuang, China
  • 2 Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in predicting weaning failure from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.We searched the relevant literature up to January 2024 in the databases Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed. Two researchers independently screened eligible studies and extracted data; disagreements, if any, were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third-party expert. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.3 and Stata version 18.0, applying bivariate random-effects models to estimate sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios, and their 95% confidence intervals, as well as to summarize receiver operating characteristic curves. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic, and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis. The study follows the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in reporting.Results: Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which 13 studies (totaling 988 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.91) and a specificity of 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.83) for lung ultrasound in predicting extubation failure. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.89). Meta-regression analysis identified lung ultrasound thresholds, reference standards (extubation outcomes), and study flow and time bias as significant factors influencing diagnostic accuracy.This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that lung ultrasound has high diagnostic accuracy in predicting extubation failure in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Despite some study heterogeneity, lung ultrasound proved to be a reliable predictive tool for extubation failure. Future research should focus on standardizing the definition of extubation failure, exploring the impact of different thresholds on the predictive ability of lung ultrasound, and validating its application in various clinical settings to enhance its utility and accuracy in clinical practice.

    Keywords: ultrasonography 1, extubation 2, weaning 3, critical care 4, Meta-analysis 5

    Received: 26 Aug 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Guo, Wang, Zhang, Shen and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Heling Zhao, Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, China., Shijiazhuang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.