Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Regulatory Science
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1481551
This article is part of the Research Topic Ecosystems-Centered Health and Care Innovation View all 3 articles

An assessment of the European Patient Summary for clinical research: A case study in cardiology

Provisionally accepted
Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen 1*A. Anil Sinaci A. Anil Sinaci 1Tuncay Namli Tuncay Namli 1Machteld J. Boonstra Machteld J. Boonstra 2,3Karim Lekadir Karim Lekadir 4,5Polyxeni Gkontra Polyxeni Gkontra 4Catherine Chronaki Catherine Chronaki 6Rhonda Facile Rhonda Facile 7Rebecca Kush Rebecca Kush 7
  • 1 Software Research and Development Consulting, Ankara, Türkiye
  • 2 Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology and Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 3 Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart failure & arrhythmias, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 4 Barcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • 5 Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
  • 6 HL7 Europe Foundation, Brussels, Belgium
  • 7 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The European Health Data Space initiative was launched to create a unified framework for health data exchange across Europe. Central to this initiative is the European Electronic Health Record Exchange Format, designed to achieve interoperability of electronic health record data across Europe. Despite these advancements, the readiness of current guidelines and implementations, such as the European Patient Summary, to support secondary use in clinical research, particularly in cardiology, remains under-explored.Methods: This study aims to evaluate the European Patient Summary guidelines and their implementations, specifically the HL7 FHIR International Patient Summary Implementation Guide, to determine their suitability for secondary use in clinical research. The focus is on identifying gaps and extensions needed to enhance the utility of the European Patient Summary for building artificial intelligence models for assisting heart failure management.We have selected two European Union funded research projects, DataTools4Heart and AI4HF that aim to reuse electronic health record data to develop artificial intelligence models for personalized decision support services for heart failure patients. We analyzed their clinical use cases and the specific data items required, and we compared these with the current European Patient Summary guidelines and provided a detailed gap analysis indicating similarities and required extensions. In our gap analysis, we also compared the needs of DataTools4Heart and AI4HF with the HL7 FHIR International Patient Summary Implementation Guide, to assess the extensions needed to support clinical research.The EHDS is a transformative initiative aimed at establishing a European health data ecosystem that supports both healthcare delivery and clinical research. Our comparative analysis demonstrates that, with minor extensions, these guidelines have significant potential to facilitate access to electronic healthcare record data for secondary uses, particularly in training AI models. We advocate for the adoption of an international patient summary format as a semantically interoperable core set of data elements, which will enhance global clinical research efforts and improve patient outcomes through precision medicine.

    Keywords: health ecosystem1, secondary use of EHR data2, clinical research3, interoperability4, Common data model5

    Received: 16 Aug 2024; Accepted: 04 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Laleci Erturkmen, Sinaci, Namli, Boonstra, Lekadir, Gkontra, Chronaki, Facile and Kush. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen, Software Research and Development Consulting, Ankara, Türkiye

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.