The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Med.
Sec. Ophthalmology
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1479891
This article is part of the Research Topic Differences Between Emmetropic and Myopic Eyes: Implications for Myopia Development, its Progression, and Ocular Health View all 7 articles
Meta-analysis of retinal transcriptome profiling studies in animal models of myopia
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
- 2 Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartu County, Estonia
- 3 Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, Georgia, United States
Objective: Myopia prevalence is increasing at alarming rates, yet the underlying mechanistic causes are not understood. Several studies have employed experimental animal models of myopia and transcriptome profiling to identify genes and pathways contributing to myopia. In this study, we determined the retinal transcriptome changes in response to form deprivation in mouse retinas. We then conducted a transcriptome meta-analysis incorporating all publicly available datasets and analyzed how the results related to the genes associated with refractive errors in human genome-wide association studies (GWAS).Methods: Form deprivation was induced in three male C57BL6/J mice from postnatal day 28 (P28) to P42. Retinal gene expression was analyzed with RNA sequencing, followed by differential gene expression analysis with DESeq2 and identification of associated pathways with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). A systematic search identified four similar retinal transcriptomics datasets in response to experimental myopia using chicks or mice. The five studies underwent transcriptome meta-analyses to determine retinal gene expression changes and associated pathways. The results were compared with genes associated with human myopia.Results: Differential gene expression analysis of form-deprived mouse retinas revealed 235 significantly altered transcripts, implicating the BMP2 signaling pathway and circadian rhythms, among others. Transcriptome-wide meta-analyses of experimental myopia datasets found 427 differentially expressed genes in the mouse model and 1,110 in the chick model, with limited gene overlap between species. Pathway analysis of these two gene sets implicated TGF-beta signaling and circadian rhythm pathways in both mouse and chick retinas. Some pathways associated only with mouse retinal changes included dopamine signaling and HIF-1 signaling pathway, whereas glucagon signaling was only associated with gene changes in chick retinas. The follistatin gene changed in both mouse and chick retinas and has also been implicated in human myopia. TGF-beta signaling pathway and circadian entrainment processes were associated with myopia in mice, chicks, and humans.This study highlights the power of combining datasets to enhance statistical power and identify robust gene expression changes across different experimental animal models and conditions. The data supports other experimental evidence that TGF-beta signaling pathway and circadian rhythms are involved in myopic eye growth.
Keywords: Myopia, Transcriptomics, Meta-analysis, Experimental models, RNA-Seq
Received: 13 Aug 2024; Accepted: 10 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Palumaa, Balamurugan and Pardue. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Teele Palumaa, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.