Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Geriatric Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1477500

Renal function assessment in older people: comparative analysis of estimation equation with serum creatinine

Provisionally accepted
Stefania Peruzzo Stefania Peruzzo 1Silvia Ottaviani Silvia Ottaviani 1Luca Tagliafico Luca Tagliafico 1Mariya Muzyka Mariya Muzyka 1Marta Ponzano Marta Ponzano 2Cristina Marelli Cristina Marelli 2Alessio Signori Alessio Signori 2Alessio Nencioni Alessio Nencioni 1Fiammetta Monacelli Fiammetta Monacelli 1*
  • 1 Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
  • 2 Department of Experimental Medicine, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Age-related changes occurring in the kidney can lead to a reduction in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR); especially in older adults with multimorbidity and/or frailty, an accurate evaluation of kidney function is critical. For the estimation of GFR in patients over 70 years, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) is often used. However, validated equations exist for old-age populations like BIS1 (Berlin Initiative Study 1) and FAS (Full Age Spectrum). Here we aimed to compare the performance of CKD-EPI, MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), BIS1, and FAS in assessing eGFR in a population of patients over 70, to evaluate which shows the most accurate performance in our setting. A total of 499 older adults were recruited in the Orthogeriatric ward and Oncogeriatrics clinic of IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino in Genoa Italy. eGFR was calculated using CKD-EPI, MDRD, BIS1, and FAS, calculating mean, median, standard deviation, and interquartile range. Bland-Altman graphs were used to evaluate how each equation performs and the concordance of the attribution of the KDIGO CKD stage was performed with Cohen's K constant and chi-squared test. Patients' mean age was 82.6 years (± 7.44), and mean creatinine value was 0.97 (± 0.71) mg/dl. The mean value of eGFR was 70 ml/min with CKD-EPI (± 20.6) and MDRD (± 25.7), 57 ml/min with BIS1 (± 16.7) and FAS (± 19.0), respectively. BIS1 and FAS estimated lower eGFR values than CKD-EPI and MDRD. As age increases, a steady decrease in filtrate value is observed with BIS1 and FAS. MDRD and CDK-EPI do not show the same trend. The performance of the equations at a fixed eGFR value of 30 ml/min is more linear for BIS1 and FAS compared with CKD-EPI and MDRD. Upon evaluation with chi-square, the attribution of KDIGO stage was different among the various equations. An appropriate assessment of renal function is of key relevance to prevent adverse outcomes and risk of drug accumulation in older adults. Our study originally showed that in persons aged more than 70 years old BIS1 is the most accurate formula in calculating eGFR values when only serum creatinine is available.

    Keywords: eGFR equations, older adults, Chronic Kidney Disease, Creatinine, BIS1, CKD-EPI, Fas, MDRD

    Received: 07 Aug 2024; Accepted: 21 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Peruzzo, Ottaviani, Tagliafico, Muzyka, Ponzano, Marelli, Signori, Nencioni and Monacelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Fiammetta Monacelli, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.