Skip to main content

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Med.
Sec. Healthcare Professions Education
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1467362
This article is part of the Research Topic Opportunities and Challenges of Interprofessional Collaboration and Education - Volume II View all 4 articles

Developing an Interprofessional Identity without Altering one's Professional Identity: Findings related to Extended Professional Identity Theory (EPIT)

Provisionally accepted
Jan Jaap Reinders Jan Jaap Reinders 1,2,3*İnci Başer Kolcu İnci Başer Kolcu 4,5,6Giray Kolcu Giray Kolcu 7
  • 1 Research Group Healthy Ageing Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 2 Research Group Interprofessional Education (IPE), LEARN, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 3 Department of Behavioral and Community Dentistry, Center for Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 4 Institute of Health Sciences, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
  • 5 Institute of Health Sciences, Director, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Türkiye
  • 6 Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Türkiye
  • 7 Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Isparta, Türkiye

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Collaboration among various professions often faces barriers owing to divergent perspectives, priorities, and expertise shaped by distinct socialization processes. These differences can hinder effectiveness, efficiency, and workforce well-being. The Extended Professional Identity Theory (EPIT) addresses this issue by fostering an interprofessional identity without weakening professional identities. Drawing from psychological theories, EPIT explains the coexistence of interprofessional and professional identities, and predicts associated behaviors. It also emphasizes the importance of combining interprofessional identity formation with developing interprofessional competencies and adapting to environmental factors to achieve synergy in (temporary or permanent) mixed profession groups. Introduced in 2018, EPIT research initially relied on the measurement of congruent interprofessional behaviors as indirect indicators of interprofessional identity that could not yet be measured. An experiment demonstrated that enhancing social identification in mixed profession groups with interprofessional assignments reduced the social hierarchy within six hours across three meetings. The 2020 development of the Extended Professional Identity Scale (EPIS) confirmed interprofessional identity as a three-dimensional social construct. So far, several scientific studies have supported many propositions of EPIT. These propositions are related to dimensionality and various psychometric properties, cross-cultural similarities, evidence and clues for interprofessional identity formation, and its predictive validity in interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Türkiye is among several countries (e.g., the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Lithuania, Finland, and Indonesia) where EPIT-based interprofessional identity is being investigated. To illustrate contextual differences and their potential cross-cultural implications, it is valuable to explore how interprofessional identity adds value in the Turkish context. This approach facilitates understanding the regional implications of interprofessional identity, including interprofessional education initiatives, increased university engagement, the development of measurement instruments, challenges and future directions, and national and international collaborations. This paper aims to explain and clarify EPIT propositions compared to other theories, describe current evidence, and outline future research directions, with a focus on developments within the Turkish context as a showcase.

    Keywords: Interprofessional identity, EPIT, EPIs, IPE, IPECP, Theory, interprofessional collaboration, Motivation

    Received: 19 Jul 2024; Accepted: 28 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Reinders, Başer Kolcu and Kolcu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jan Jaap Reinders, Research Group Healthy Ageing Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.