Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Geriatric Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1466366
This article is part of the Research Topic Clinical Management of Older Persons with Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions View all 5 articles

The Edmonton Frail Scale as a screening score for frailty in oncogeriatrics

Provisionally accepted
Julia De Schrevel Julia De Schrevel 1,2*Clémentine Faucon Clémentine Faucon 1,2*François-Xavier Sibille François-Xavier Sibille 3,4Laura Dumont Laura Dumont 2,5*Francois R. HERRMANN Francois R. HERRMANN 6Héloïse Rouvière Héloïse Rouvière 1,2*Sandra De Breucker Sandra De Breucker 1,2,6*
  • 1 Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  • 2 Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
  • 3 Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium
  • 4 CHU UCL Namur Site Godinne, Namur, Belgium
  • 5 Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut Jules Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium
  • 6 Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève (HUG), Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is recommended for assessing frailty in older cancer patients but is time-consuming. The G8 screening tool was developed to select frail patients requiring CGA to optimize resources. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) is another frailty scale validated for preoperative frailty screening, but scarcely studied in the field of oncogeriatrics. In this study, we examined the added value of the EFS in older cancer patients already considered as frail by the G8, by analyzing the association of EFS with CGA adjusted for age, gender, metastatic stage and comorbidity. We also analyzed the association of EFS with the one-year mortality rate after adjusting for cancer type and metastatic stage.Methodology: This retrospective study included patients aged over 70 years old with a new diagnosis of cancer, considered as potentially frail according to the G8 and who had had a CGA (N=380).The EFS identified 329 (86.58%) patients as frail and having a statistically significant predicted number of pathological components on the CGA (r =0.64, p<0.001).When adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and metastatic stage, the EFS was independently associated with the CGA (p<0001), as well as with comorbidity (p=0.004). The patients who died in the first year (43%) had a significantly higher mean EFS score (8/17) than living patients (6/17) (p<0.0001). After adjustment for cancer type and stage, EFS independently predicted one-year mortality (OR 1.17; IC95% 1.08-1.28; pseudoR 2 = 0.228, p<0.001).The EFS is a reliable tool for predicting frailty identified by the CGA in an older cancer population pre-selected as frail by the G8. EFS is an independent predictor of one-year mortality after adjustment for confounding factors. Validation of the EFS as a screening tool for frailty in cancer requires further studies to assess its performance in patients with normal G8 scores.

    Keywords: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Edmonton Frail Scale, Cancer, Oncogeriatrics, Frailty

    Received: 17 Jul 2024; Accepted: 16 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 De Schrevel, Faucon, Sibille, Dumont, HERRMANN, Rouvière and De Breucker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Julia De Schrevel, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Clémentine Faucon, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Laura Dumont, Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut Jules Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles, Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
    Héloïse Rouvière, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Sandra De Breucker, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.