Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Geriatric Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1450883
This article is part of the Research Topic Management of Spine Pathologies in Geriatric Patients View all 4 articles

New Protocol for Early Robot-Assisted Gait Training after Spinal Surgery

Provisionally accepted
Sanghyun Jee Sanghyun Jee 1Chan Woong Jang Chan Woong Jang 2Sang Hoon Shin Sang Hoon Shin 1*Yeji Kim Yeji Kim 3Jung Hyun Park Jung Hyun Park 1*
  • 1 Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2 Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang-si, Republic of Korea
  • 3 National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Early rehabilitation post-spinal surgery is vital for patients' recovery. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) shows promise but requires further study to establish a specific protocol and gauge its effects on both patients and physical therapists. This study aimed to determine the impact of a newly developed protocol for early RAGT on patients' functional enhancement and satisfaction levels after spinal surgery, as well as on the physical therapists who implemented the therapy.First, we developed the protocol in collaboration with three physiatrists and two physical therapists with extensive experience in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. The protocol was updated three times, each after three rounds of face-to-face meetings. Afterward, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving five physical therapists and 32 post-spinal surgery patients at a tertiary hospital rehabilitation center. The intervention consisted of five sessions of RAGT. Main outcome measures included the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), the ambulation item of the Modified Barthel Index (MBI ambulation), and satisfaction surveys for both patients and physical therapists.RAGT typically started 17.91 ± 9.76 days postoperatively and was successfully applied with no remarkable adverse effects. The FAC scores increased from 2.65 ± 1.21 to 3.78 ± 0.71 (p = 0.006), and MBI ambulation increased from 7.69 ± 2.71 to 10.66 ± 2.90 (p < 0.001) between transfer and discharge. Satisfaction with the robot, RAGT, and treatment, assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, were 3.30 ± 0.79, 3.72 ± 0.85, and 3.08 ± 0.84, respectively. Satisfaction was notably the highest for alleviating fear of falling, whereas managing pain and discomfort during position changes scored the lowest. Physical therapists rated RAGT satisfaction, impact on the working environment, and treatment stability at 3.0 ± 0.65, 2.80 ± 0.67, and 3.50 ± 0.61, respectively.Early spinal surgery rehabilitation with RAGT improved patients' functionality and gait satisfaction. While physical therapists considered RAGT safe, its impact on their work environment was limited. Integrating RAGT into post-spinal surgery rehabilitation demands ongoing protocol refinement, custom robot development, and efficacy evaluations.

    Keywords: enhanced postoperative recovery1, exercise therapy2, patient satisfaction3, rehabilitation4, robotics5, spine6

    Received: 18 Jun 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Jee, Jang, Shin, Kim and Park. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Sang Hoon Shin, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Jung Hyun Park, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.