AUTHOR=Vásquez-Tirado Gustavo Adolfo , Quispe-Castañeda Claudia Vanessa , Meregildo-Rodríguez Edinson Dante , Cuadra-Campos María , Segura-Plasencia Niler Manuel , Arbayza-Avalos Yessenia Katherin , Alva-Guarniz Hugo Nelson , Guzmán-Aguilar Wilson Marcial , Zavaleta-Alaya Petterson TITLE=Association of beta blockers and mortality in adults with septic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1448573 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2024.1448573 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Introduction

Septic shock still entails significant morbidity and mortality, with the heart being affected due to catecholamine overexpression and direct injury from sepsis. Therefore, the effect of β-blocking the receptors to improve performance is promising when attempting to reverse tachycardia and reduce mortality.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases for studies published up to 28 January 2024, using a PICO strategy. Ten studies were identified for quantitative analysis and included in our meta-analysis.

Results

Our meta-analysis evaluated 28-day in-hospital mortality risk across nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,121 adults with septic shock. We found an association between β-blocker use and reduced overall mortality (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34–0.98; I2: 56%). This effect was significant in the esmolol subgroup (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26–0.82; I2: 32%), but not in the landiolol subgroup (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.0–1,284.5; I2: 72%). Additionally, the intervention group shows a significant reduction in HR and lactate levels, as well as an increase in stroke volume index (SVI).

Conclusion

In adults with septic shock, β-blockers are associated with a reduction in 28-day in-hospital mortality, a benefit primarily observed with esmolol rather than landiolol. Furthermore, improvements in heart rate (HR) control, lactate levels, and SVI were noted. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality RCTs comparing different β-blockers are necessary to better elucidate these effects.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024513610.