AUTHOR=Kim Youngjin , Park Ha-im , Chu Hongmin , Jin Hanbit , Leem Jungtae 

TITLE=Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture modalities for overweight and obesity treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine

VOLUME=11

YEAR=2024

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1446515

DOI=10.3389/fmed.2024.1446515

ISSN=2296-858X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Introduction</title><p>The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of obesity have not been assessed. This poses a challenge for clinicians who choose to use acupuncture in the treatment of obesity, as they are unable to prioritize this approach based on outcome variables.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>In May 2024, a literature search of five databases was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials evaluating body weight (BW), body mass index, waist circumference (WC), and adverse events in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or higher for various acupuncture modalities were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2. Pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed using a random effects model for quantitative synthesis.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Fourteen studies (<italic>n</italic> = 868) were included. The included studies evaluated the following acupuncture modalities: electroacupuncture (EA) (<italic>N</italic> = 6), laser acupuncture (LA) (<italic>N</italic> = 2), auricular acupuncture (AA) (<italic>N</italic> = 5), and manual acupuncture (MA) (<italic>N</italic> = 3). The PMA found that adding EA to usual care (UC), compared to UC alone, reduced BW (MD = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.12 to 3.80, <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> = 58%, REM, <italic>N</italic> = 3, <italic>n</italic> = 157). The NMA of BW showed the following effect sizes for UC alone versus each acupuncture modality combined with UC: LA (MD = 2.09, 95% CI = 0.04 to 3.86), EA (MD = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.88 to 3.50), AA (MD = 1.69, 95% CI = −0.11 to 3.58), and MA (MD = 1.02, 95% CI = −0.82 to 2.94). The probability of each modality being the optimal treatment was evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. EA was the most efficacious for BW and BMI, while LA was the most efficacious for WC.</p></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>EA and LA can effectively complement clinical obesity management. The number of included studies was limited, and publication bias may have occurred, necessitating a cautious interpretation of the results. Furthermore, most studies lasted between six and 12 weeks. Future clinical studies of acupuncture for obesity should include longer follow-up periods.</p></sec><sec><title>Systematic review registration</title><p><uri xlink:href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=387788" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=387788</uri>, identifier CRD42023387788.</p></sec>