AUTHOR=Xu Lei , Yang Zhihao , Chen Huawei , Sun Chengjun , Tu Chuanjian , Gu Zhiwei , Luo Ming TITLE=Conditional survival and changing risk profile in patients with gliosarcoma JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1443157 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2024.1443157 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Background

Conditional survival (CS) considers the duration since the initial diagnosis and can provide supplementary informative insights. Our objective was to evaluate CS among gliosarcoma (GSM) patients and develop a CS-incorporated nomogram to predict the conditional probability of survival.

Methods

This retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database included patients with GSM between 2000 and 2017. The CS was defined as the probability of surviving additional y years after already surviving for x years. The formula utilized for CS was: CS(y|x) = S(y + x)/S(x), where S(x) denotes the overall survival at x years. Univariate Cox regression, best subset regression (BSR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used for significant prognostic factors screening. Following this, backward stepwise multivariable Cox regression was utilized to refine predictor selection. Finally, a novel CS-integrated nomogram model was developed and we also employed diverse evaluation methods to assess its performance.

Results

This study included a total of 1,015 GSM patients, comprising 710 patients in training cohort and 305 patients in validation cohort. CS analysis indicated a gradual increase in the probability of achieving a 5-year survival, ascending from 5% at diagnosis to 13, 31, 56, and 74% with each subsequent year survived after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post-diagnosis, respectively. Following variable screening through univariate Cox regression, BSR, and LASSO analysis, five factors-age, tumor stage, tumor size, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy-were ultimately identified for constructing the CS-nomogram model. The performance of the nomogram model was validated through discrimination and calibration assessments in both the training and validation cohorts. Furthermore, we confirmed that the effectiveness of the CS-nomogram in stratifying GSM patient risk status.

Conclusion

This nationwide study delineated the CS of patients diagnosed with GSM. Utilizing national data, a CS-nomogram could provide valuable guidance for patient counseling during follow-up and risk stratification.