Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Nephrology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1432965

Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and All-cause Mortality Using Race and Race-free Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study

Provisionally accepted
Haiping Wang Haiping Wang 1,2Jiahui Cai Jiahui Cai 2Hao Fan Hao Fan 2Clarissa Diamantidis Clarissa Diamantidis 3Bessie Young Bessie Young 4Aurelian Bidulescu Aurelian Bidulescu 2*
  • 1 First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
  • 2 Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States
  • 3 Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • 4 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background New Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations without a race adjustment were developed to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We aimed to compare the performance of five CKD-EPI eGFR equations, with or without race, in predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality in Black Americans from the Jackson Heart Study. Methods JHS is an ongoing population-based prospective cohort study of African Americans in the Jackson, Mississippi, metropolitan area. Five CKD-EPI equations were used to estimate GFR at baseline using serum creatinine (Cr) or cystatin C (cys), including 2009 eGFRcr(ASR [age, sex, race]), 2021 eGFRcr(AS [age and sex]), 2012 eGFRcr-cys(ASR), 2021 eGFRcr-cys(AS), 2012 eGFRcys(AS). Endpoints were incident CVD events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the associations between different eGFRs and outcomes adjusting for atherosclerotic risk factors. Harrell’s C-statistics and Net Reclassification Index (NRI) were used to assess the predictive utility. Results Among 5129 participants (average age 54.8 ± 12.8yrs), 1898 were male (36.6%). eGFRcr(AS) provided lower estimates and resulting in a greater proportion of participants categorized as CKD than eGFRcr(ASR), eGFRcr-cys(ASR), eGFRcr-cys(AS) and eGFRcys(AS). A median follow-up of 13.7 and 14.3 years revealed 411 (9.3%) CVD incidents and 1207 (23.5%) deaths. Lower eGFRs were associated with CVD incidents and all-cause mortality. eGFRcr-cys(ASR), eGFRcr-cys(AS) and eGFRcys(AS) were strongly associated with incident CVD events and all-cause mortality than eGFRcr(ASR) and eGFRcr(AS). A significant discrimination improvement was found in C-statistics for predicting incident CVD events and all-cause mortality after adding each eGFR measure to the basic model including atherosclerotic risk factors. Across a 7.5% 10-year risk threshold, eGFRcys(AS) improved net classification of all-cause mortality (NRI: 2.19%, 95%CI: 0.08%, 4.65%). Conclusions eGFRs based on creatinine omit race has the lowest mean and detects more CKD patients in Black population. The eGFR incorporating cystatin C strengthens the association between the eGFR and the risks of incident CVD and all-cause mortality. Cystatin C-based eGFR equations might be more appropriate for predicting CVD and mortality among Black population.

    Keywords: Estimate glomerular filtration rate, Creatinine, Cystatin C, cardiovascular disease, All-cause mortality, African Americans

    Received: 17 May 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Cai, Fan, Diamantidis, Young and Bidulescu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Aurelian Bidulescu, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47405, Indiana, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.