AUTHOR=Tommasi Stefania , Maurmo Leonarda , Rizzo Alessandro , Carella Claudia , Ranieri Girolamo , De Summa Simona , Mannavola Francesco , Chiurì Vincenzo Emanuele , Guida Michele , Nisi Claudia , Montrone Michele , Giotta Francesco , Patruno Margherita , Lacalamita Rosanna , Pilato Brunella , Zito Francesco Alfredo , Fucci Livia , Coppola Claudio Antonio , Ditonno Paolo , Nardulli Patrizia , Quaresmini Davide , Strippoli Sabino TITLE=The molecular tumor board as a step in cancer patient management: a southern Italian experience JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1432628 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2024.1432628 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Introduction

The management of cancer patients follows a Diagnostic Therapeutic and Care Pathway (PDTA) approach, aimed at achieving the optimal balance between care and quality of life. To support this process, precision medicine and innovative technologies [e.g., next-generation sequencing (NGS)] allow rapid identification of genetic-molecular alterations useful for the design of PDTA-approved therapies. If the standard approach proves inadequate, the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a group comprising specialists from diverse disciplines, can step in to evaluate a broader molecular profile, proposing potential therapies beyond evidence levels I–II or considering enrolment in clinical trials. Our aim is to analyze the role of the MTB in the entire management of patients in our institute and its impact on the strategy of personalized medicine, particularly when all approved treatments have failed.

Materials and methods

In alignment with European and national guidelines, a panel of clinicians and preclinical specialists from our institution was defined as the MTB core team. We designed and approved a procedure for the operation of this multidisciplinary group, which is the only one operating in the Puglia region.

Results and discussion

In 29 months (2021–2023), we discussed and analyzed 93 patients. A total of 44% presented pathogenic alterations, of which 40.4% were potentially actionable. Only 11 patients were proposed for enrollment in clinical trials, treatment with off-label drugs, or AIFA (the Italian pharmaceutical agency for drugs)—5% funding. Our process indicators, time to analysis, and number of patient cases discussed are in line with the median data of other European institutions. Such findings underscore both the importance and usefulness of the integration of an MTB process into the care of oncology patients.