Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Rheumatology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1431333
This article is part of the Research Topic Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease View all 6 articles

Development of a Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition in Hand Radiographs

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 2 Department of Rheumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 3 Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 4 On behalf of, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 5 Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 6 University of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is a leading cause of arthritis, which can mimic or strongly interfere with other rheumatic diseases such as gout, osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the recently established ACR/EULAR CPPD classification criteria, calcification and OA features of the wrist and hand joints are substantial features. Objectives: To develop and test a deep-learning algorithm for automatically and reliably detecting CPPD features in hand radiographs, focusing on calcification of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP)-2 and -3 joints, in separate or combined models. Methods: Two radiologists independently labeled a dataset of 926 hand radiographs, yielding 319 CPPD positive and 607 CPPD negative cases across the three sites of interest after adjudicating discrepant cases. CPPD presence was then predicted using a convolutional neural network. We tested seven CPPD models, each with a different combination of sites out of TFCC, MCP-2 and MCP-3. The model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall (AUPR) curves, with heatmaps (Grad-CAM) aiding in case discrimination. Results: All models trialed gave good class separation, with the combined TFCC, MCP-2 and MCP-3 model showing the most robust performance with a mean AUROC of 0.86, mean AUPR of 0.77, sensitivity of 0.77, specificity of 0.80, and precision of 0.67. The TFCC-alone model had a slightly lower mean AUROC of 0.85 with a mean AUPR of 0.73. The MCP-2-alone and MCP-3-alone models exhibited mean AUROCs of 0.78-0.87, but lower mean AUPRs of 0.29-0.47. Heatmap analysis revealed activation in the regions of interest for positive cases (true and false positives), but unexpected highlights were encountered possibly due to correlated features in different hand regions. Conclusion: A combined deep-learning model detecting CPPD at the TFCC and MCP-2/3 joints in hand radiographs provides the highest diagnostic performance. The algorithm could be used to screen larger OA or RA databases or electronic medical records for CPPD cases. Future work includes dataset expansion and validation with external datasets.

    Keywords: CPPD, Chondrocalcinosis, Maschine learning, Radiograph (X-ray), detection, Image recoginiton, automated

    Received: 11 May 2024; Accepted: 08 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Hügle, Rosoux, Fahrni, Markham, Manigold and Becce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Thomas Hügle, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.