Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1398623
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements in Prenatal Diagnosis: From Noninvasive Prenatal Tests to Novel Fetal Imaging View all 7 articles

Evaluation of Tracheal Diameter and Angles in Fetuses with Double Aortic Arch Using Prenatal Ultrasound: Implications for Postnatal Management

Provisionally accepted
Caihong Jiang Caihong Jiang 1Wen Lin Wen Lin 1Longzhuang Peng Longzhuang Peng 1Shan Guo Shan Guo 1Qiumei Wu Qiumei Wu 1Chunxia Chen Chunxia Chen 2Fa Chen Fa Chen 3LI HE LI HE 4*Zongjie Weng Zongjie Weng 4*
  • 1 Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China
  • 2 Department of Radiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China
  • 3 Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
  • 4 Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: This study aims to analyze the value of prenatal ultrasound in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of double aortic arch (DAA) malformations.A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 fetal cases with double aortic arch anomalies over a 12-year period from June 1, 2011 to June 1, 2023. The assessment included combined measurements of fetal tracheal internal diameter Z-score and DAA pinch angle, along with ultrasonographic findings, associated anomalies, genetic abnormalities, postnatal CTA images, and long-term postnatal outcomes.Results: Of the 31 fetal double aortic arch cases, 15 were right aortic arch dominant, 2 were left aortic arch dominant, and 14 had a balanced double arch. Genetic testing was performed on 19 cases, revealing abnormalities in 2 cases, including one Turner syndrome, and one carrier of ichthyosis gene with heterozygous deletion. Out of the total cases, 29 were delivered, and 2 cases were terminated. Prenatal diagnosis accurately identified 29 cases (29/31, 93.5%), which was confirmed by postnatal pathological anatomy, echocardiography, surgery or CTA. Fetal tracheal internal diameter Z-scores were significantly smaller in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (-1.27±0.49 vs -0.68±0.60, P=0.018). The area under the curve was 0.776 (95% confidence interval, 0.593-0.960) using a tracheal internal diameter z-score cutoff of -0.73 with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 64.7%. The double arch pinch angle was significantly smaller in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group [52.50° (38.25° to 59.00°) vs 60.00° (53.50° to 70.50°), P=0.035]. The area under the curve was 0.744 (95% confidence interval, 0.554-0.935), and the sensitivity for determining the presence or absence of symptoms was 90% when the cutoff value was 62.5°, with a specificity of 47.1%. Fifteen cases opted for surgery with favorable surgical outcome.Prenatal echocardiography demonstrates good diagnostic efficacy for fetal double aortic arch. It is also essential to detect the presence of other underlying intra-and extracardiac malformations and genetic abnormalities. There is a significant difference in prenatal tracheal internal diameter Zscores and double arch pinch angle between asymptomatic and symptomatic DAA infants. Symptomatic infants require early surgery, while asymptomatic infants should be monitored.

    Keywords: Fetus, Echocardiography, Double aortic arch, Prenatal Diagnosis, postnatal analysis

    Received: 10 Mar 2024; Accepted: 15 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Jiang, Lin, Peng, Guo, Wu, Chen, Chen, HE and Weng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    LI HE, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
    Zongjie Weng, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.