AUTHOR=Zhang Yonghong , Yang Zhiya , Gong Jinyan , Shi Dongmei TITLE=Effects of secukinumab and ixekizumab on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1353893 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2024.1353893 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Introduction

The aims of this study is to analyze the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with psoriasis treated with secukinumab and ixekizumab.

Methodology

We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on the treatment of psoriasis with secukinumab and ixekizumab by conducting computerized searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, spanning from their inception to October 31st, 2022. The search terms used included psoriasis, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and randomized controlled trial. Two independent evaluators conducted literature screening, data extraction, and assessed the quality of included studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The gather data was subjected to meta-analysis using the statistical software RevMan 5.4.

Results

A total of 20 articles, encompassing 23 randomized controlled trials involving 10,746 psoriasis patients were included in the analysis. During the double-blind treatment period, the meta-analysis results indicated the following: There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs between the secukinumab and placebo groups [RR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.26, 1.44), p = 0.26]. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs with ixekizumab compared to the placebo group [RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.15, 1.47), p = 0.20]. Furthermore, no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs was observed between secukinumab 300 mg and secukinumab 150 mg treatment groups [RR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.23, 4.35), p = 1.00]. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs between the ixekizumab Q4W (every 4 weeks) and ixekizumab Q2W (every 2 weeks) administration groups [RR = 4.01, 95% CI (0.45, 35.89), p = 0.21].

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that neither secukinumab nor ixekizumab is significantly associated with the risk of MACEs in patients with psoriasis during double-blind treatment.

Systematic review registration: Unique Identifier: CRD42022373756 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/.