Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.
Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1343547
This article is part of the Research Topic Pathogenesis and diagnosis of angioedema without wheals – Have we revealed all secret paths? View all 5 articles

A Real-World Study of Hereditary Angioedema Patients due to C1 inhibitor deficiency Treated with Danazol in the Brazilian Public Health System

Provisionally accepted
Alessandra Ritter Alessandra Ritter 1Suelen Silva Suelen Silva 1Robson De Paula Robson De Paula 2Juliana Senra Juliana Senra 2Fabio Carvalho Fabio Carvalho 2Tatiane Ribeiro Tatiane Ribeiro 2Solange Valle Solange Valle 3*
  • 1 IQVIA Inc, North Carolina, United States
  • 2 Takeda Distribuidora Ltd., Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 3 Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Center for Health Science, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, ParanĂ¡, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency is an ultra-rare autosomal dominant inherited disease that affects 1 in 67,000 people in the world. The attacks are based on subcutaneous and submucosal edema that can lead to death if not properly managed. Considering the lack of information on clinical management of Brazilian patients with HAE, the aim of this study was to identify and characterize patients with HAE-C1-INH that used danazol prophylactic treatment in the Brazilian public health system (SUS) and the health care resources utilization (HCRU). Methods: This was an observational retrospective database study with patients treated with danazol from January 2011 until December 2021 within the SUS. The HAE cohort included patients with 12 years or older with at least one record for ICD-10 D84.1, one claim for danazol record and at least 6 months of available history in the database. Results: Our study included 799 patients treated in the SUS, with mean (SD) age at danazol initiation of 40 years ( 16). The number of patients with HAE showed a similar distribution over this 10 years period analyzed with the highest number of patients in 2015 (n=509) and 2016 (n=480). 253 (32%) patients had record of at least one attack. Of those, 45 (17.8%) had at least one procedure HAE-related hospital admission and 128 (50.6%) had at least one HAE-related hospital admission. The mean (SD) hospitalization length of stay was 5 (8) days. Over 14% (n=36) of HAE patients with attack (n=253) had at least one HAE-related ICU admission. Conclusion: This database study is the strategy used to allow us to find and describe the characteristics of patients with HAE who use danazol for long-term prophylaxis in the SUS and identify HCRU outcomes of interest such as hospitalizations, inpatient and outpatient settings. The high rate of attacks, hospitalization and general resources uses highlights the necessity to increase awareness of new strategies and accurate approach to treat HAE patients. Therefore, our findings are important indicators that our health system and guidelines need to be revised and improved to properly diagnose, treat, and assist patients with HAE.

    Keywords: hereditary angioedema, Attacks, SUS, Public setting, Healthcare resources, Androgens

    Received: 11 Dec 2023; Accepted: 15 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ritter, Silva, De Paula, Senra, Carvalho, Ribeiro and Valle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Solange Valle, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Center for Health Science, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-590, ParanĂ¡, Brazil

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.