AUTHOR=Zhang Nan , Song Qingwei , Liang Hongbing , Wang Zhuo , Wu Qi , Zhang Haonan , Zhang Lina , Liu Ailian , Wang Huali , Wang Jiazheng , Lin Liangjie TITLE=Early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast tumors: a comparative study using amide proton transfer-weighted, diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1295478 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2024.1295478 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Objective

To examine amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) combined with diffusion weighed (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI for early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer.

Materials

In this prospective study, 50 female breast cancer patients (49.58 ± 10.62 years old) administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were enrolled with MRI carried out both before NAC (T0) and at the end of the second cycle of NAC (T1). The patients were divided into 2 groups based on tumor response according to the Miller-Payne Grading (MPG) system. Group 1 included patients with a greater degree of decrease in major histologic responder (MHR, Miller-Payne G4-5), while group 2 included non-MHR cases (Miller-Payne G1-3). Traditional imaging protocols (T1 weighted, T2 weighted, diffusion weighted, and DCE-MRI) and APTw imaging were scanned for each subject before and after treatment. APTw value (APTw0 and APTw1), Dmax (maximum diameter, Dmax0 and Dmax1), V (3D tumor volume, V0 and V1), and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC0 and ADC1) before and after treatment, as well as changes between the two times points (ΔAPT, ΔDmax, ΔV, ΔADC) for breast tumors were compared between the two groups.

Results

APT0 and APT1 values significantly differed between the two groups (p = 0.034 and 0.01). ΔAPTw values were significantly lower in non-MHR tumors compared with MHR tumors (p = 0.015). ΔDmax values were significantly higher in MHR tumors compared with non-MHR tumors (p = 0.005). ADC0 and ADC1 values were significantly higher in MHR tumors than in non-MHR tumors (p = 0.038 and 0.035). AUC (Dmax+DWI + APTw) = AUC (Dmax+APTw) > AUC (APTw) > AUC (Dmax+DWI) > AUC (Dmax).

Conclusion

APTw imaging along with change of tumor size showed a significant potential in early prediction of MHR for NAC treatment in breast cancer, which might allow timely regimen refinement before definitive surgical treatment.