AUTHOR=De Luca Giacomo , Campochiaro Corrado , Burastero Samuele E. , Matucci-Cerinic Marco , Doglioni Claudio , Dagna Lorenzo TITLE=Periostin expression in uninvolved skin as a potential biomarker for rapid cutaneous progression in systemic sclerosis patients: a preliminary explorative study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=10 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1214523 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2023.1214523 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate periostin serum levels and skin expression in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods

We enrolled 35 patients with diffuse (d-SSc) or limited (l-SSc) SSc, 15 patients with very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS), and 30 sex-matched healthy controls. Periostin serum levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Periostin skin expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paired involved and uninvolved 5-mm skin biopsy samples in a subgroup of 10 d-SSc and 10 L-SSc patients. A 12-month follow-up was considered.

Results

We included 50 patients (mean age 53.1 ± 16.1 years; women 94%; mean disease duration 38.2 ± 45.1 months; anti-centromere 50%; anti-Scl70 40%), 35 of them with a definite SSc (68.8% l-SSc; 31.4% d-SSc; mean mRSS 9.0 ± 7.2) and 15 with VEDOSS; 30 controls were also included in this study. Periostin serum levels were higher in SSc patients compared to controls (32.7 ± 8.0 ng/mL vs. 27.7 ± 7.3 ng/mL; p < 0.001), while these levels were comparable among different groups of patients (29.7 ± 6.9 ng/mL in VEDOSS, 33.4 ± 7.8 ng/mL in lc-SSc; and 34.0 ± 8.5 in dc-SSc; p = ns). SSc patients with digital ulcers had higher periostin serum levels (36.2 ± 7.9 ng/mL vs. 30.6 ± 7.3 ng/mL, p < 0.02). Samples from the involved skin of l-SSc and d-SSc patients showed a significant dermal expression of periostin; an identical periostin expression was evident in the uninvolved skin of patients with d-SSc. In 7 out of 10 L-SSc patients, periostin expression was absent on uninvolved skin. In the remaining three l-SSc patients, a mild periostin expression on IHC was detectable on uninvolved skin and all of these three l-SSc patients presented a dramatic skin progression.

Conclusion

Periostin skin expression may be a useful biomarker to indicate the presence of a disease at a higher risk of rapid cutaneous involvement.