This article is a commentary on:
Intravenous fentanyl vs. topical lignocaine for ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol induction
Sun Zhongpeng
Yang Dong- Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CAMS&PUMC), Beijing, China
A Commentary on
Intravenous fentanyl vs. topical lignocaine for ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol induction
by Rahmat Ameen Noorazyze, N. A. N., Nor, N. M., Zain, J. M., Mohamad Yusof, A., and Yong, L. C. (2022). Front. Med. 9:979275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.979275
Introduction
With the development of the supraglottic airway, the use of a laryngeal mask airway is becoming increasingly widespread for anesthesiologists. Therefore, we should strictly control the indications for the use of a laryngeal mask airway.
In a recent randomized, controlled, double-blind cohort study, Rahmat Ameen Noorazyze et al. (1) discovered that topical spraying of lignocaine was more effective than intravenous fentanyl in inserting the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA). Aside from the shortcomings mentioned in the article, the authors must clarify several methodological issues.
First, it was generally known that the PLMA is a second-generation reusable inflatable laryngeal mask airway (2). Thus, we would like to know the cuff pressure of the PLMA in this trial and whether it was monitored and adjusted. If not, this may be a potential drawback of the study. Furthermore, determining the optimal timing for PLMA removal was a major challenge for the anesthetist, as it could potentially result in emergency adverse airway events such as laryngospasm. We are interested in understanding whether the patients were fully awake or had an optimal level of anesthesia when the PLMA was removed after the procedure.
Second, while sevoflurane was utilized for intraoperative anesthetic maintenance in this trial, the authors did not specify which opioid was used for perioperative anesthetic maintenance or when it was withdrawn. Reliable data shows that the administration of opioids may minimize airway reactions after mask removal, such as choking, laryngospasm, and other airway-related adverse effects (3). Furthermore, the authors did not specify the type of surgery or the duration of the procedure or anesthesia. These unknown variables could potentially bias the outcomes of their investigation.
Third, the PLMA was inserted without a muscle relaxant, which could potentially induce impairment of the mucosa in the supraglottis. However, an essential sign of injury to the airway mucosa, the presence of blood on the PLMA after removal, was not documented.
Their findings have positive implications for the clinical use of PLMA. If the authors could provide more information and increase the transparency of the study, it may significantly improve its credibility.
Author contributions
SZ drafted the manuscript. YD carefully read and revised the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Rahmat Ameen Noorazyze Noorazyze NA, Nor NM, Zain JM, Mohamad Yusof A, Yong LC. Intravenous fentanyl vs. topical lignocaine for ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol induction. Front Med. (2022) 9:979275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.979275
2. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Brimacombe N, Scully M, Barry J, et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesiology. (2000) 93:26–31. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00009
Keywords: supraglottic airway, fentanyl, lignocaine, ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway, propofol
Citation: Zhongpeng S and Dong Y (2023) Commentary: Intravenous fentanyl vs. topical lignocaine for ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol induction. Front. Med. 10:1147730. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1147730
Received: 20 January 2023; Accepted: 27 March 2023;
Published: 18 April 2023.
Edited by:
Antonino Morabito, University of Florence, ItalyReviewed by:
Lei Zhao, Capital Medical University, ChinaCopyright © 2023 Zhongpeng and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yang Dong, eWFuZ2RvbmdwdW1jJiN4MDAwNDA7MTI2LmNvbQ==