AUTHOR=Mirna Moritz , Schmutzler Lukas , Topf Albert , Sipos Brigitte , Hehenwarter Lukas , Hoppe Uta C. , Lichtenauer Michael TITLE=A Novel Clinical Score for Differential Diagnosis Between Acute Myocarditis and Acute Coronary Syndrome – The SAlzburg MYocarditis (SAMY) Score JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=9 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.875682 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2022.875682 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Background

Acute myocarditis and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are important differential diagnoses in patients with new-onset chest pain. To date, no clinical score exists to support the differentiation between these two diseases. The aim of this study was to develop such a score to aid the physician in scenarios where discrimination between myocarditis and ACS appears difficult.

Materials and Methods

Patients with ACS (n = 233) and acute myocarditis (n = 123) were retrospectively enrolled. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was conducted to identify parameters associated with the highest or least probability for acute myocarditis. Logistic regression was conducted using the identified parameters and score points for each level of the predictors were calculated. Cutoffs for the prediction of myocarditis were calculated. Validation was conducted in a separate cohort of 90 patients.

Results

A score for prediction of acute myocarditis was calculated using six parameters [age, previous infection, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, C-reactive protein (CRP), and leukocyte count]. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between total score points and the presence of myocarditis (B = 0.9078, p < 0.0001). Cutoff #1 for the prediction of myocarditis was calculated at ≥ 4 (Sens.: 90.3%, Spec.: 93.1%; 46.3% predicted probability for acute myocarditis), cutoff #2 was calculated at ≥ 7 (Sens.: 73.1%, Spec.: > 99.9%; 92.9% pred. prob.). Validation showed good discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.935] and calibration of the score.

Conclusion

Our clinical score showed good discrimination and calibration for differentiating patients with acute myocarditis and ACS. Thus, it could support the differential diagnosis between these two disease entities and could facilitate clinical decisions in affected patients.