Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Med., 04 January 2023
Sec. Pathology
This article is part of the Research Topic Aldehyde Dehydrogenase in Clinical Settings: Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Solid Tumors View all 5 articles

Editorial: Aldehyde dehydrogenase in clinical settings: Potential biomarker and therapeutic target in solid tumors

  • 1Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine—DIMES of the Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, G.B. Morgagni—L. Pierantoni Hospital, Forlí, Italy
  • 2Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

In humans, the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) family contains 19 active isoenzymes that are expressed in the majority of mammalian tissues [Zanoni et al.; (1)]. Each ALDH isoform exhibits a specific expression pattern and has an independent functional role in cancer (2, 3). The ALDH1A1 isoform detoxifies the enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of intracellular aldehydes (4). Clinical studies have shown that this isoenzyme is highly expressed in several solid tumors, such as lung cancer (4). Additionally, previous work has demonstrated that ALDHs are overexpressed in cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are subpopulations of cancer cells with stem-like features such as unlimited proliferative potential and drug resistance (5). These features both represent major clinical challenges in many cancer types. ALDH1A1 has been recently described as a marker for identifying and isolating human CSCs in non-small cell lung cancer (6, 7). Moreover, ALDH1A1 is involved in several cellular processes such as differentiation, retinoic acid (RA) synthesis, and the detoxification and regulation of amino acid and lipid metabolism (8). Specifically, ALDH enzymes enable cancer cells to metabolize toxic aldehydes into carboxylic acids, which are less reactive and more soluble. This function is particularly advantageous in the setting of anti-tumor therapies that facilitate aldehyde accumulation and DNA double-strand break formation via lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation (Zanoni et al.).

In addition to promoting CSCs survival, ALDH overexpression can also influence immune cells. Specifically, RA signaling-mediated reductions in ROS impair immunogenic cell death by activating and stabilizing immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) [Zanoni et al.; (9, 10)]. In particular, Tregs are crucial for promoting immune tolerance and preventing aberrant immune responses. On the other hand, they compromise anti-tumor immunity and promote the progression of many different carcinoma types. This phenomenon is particularly evident in tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, in which high levels of ALDH1A1 are associated with worse patient prognosis (10). Moreover, previous studies have shown that increased ALDH1 expression positively correlates with resistance to radiation therapy and chemotherapy, as well as with malignant progression, in cancer patients (10, 11). This relationship is due to the capacity of ALDH1A to modulate the intracellular pH within tumors, as well as the activation of drug-resistance pathways such as the USP28/MYC, ALDH1A1/HIF-1α/VEGF, and Wnt/β-catenin axes (Wei et al.). Therefore, ongoing research is exploring ALDH1 as a therapeutic target in several solid tumors. Inhibition of ALDH1 may reduce cancer cell proliferation, thereby suppressing the recurrence and metastasis of malignant tumors (Wei et al.).

Despite several recent studies seeking to characterize ALDH inhibitors for the treatment of solid tumors, there is no clinical evidence available that attests to their efficacy or safety, potentially due to their high toxicity and limited efficacy and/or bioavailability [Zanoni et al.; (911); Wei et al.]. Moreover, many of these inhibitors have been effective in preclinical models of solid tumors. Therefore, a deeper understanding of ALDHs as therapeutic targets will be crucial for the development of anti-neoplastic ALDH inhibitors. In particular, it may be important to focus on protein domains other than the catalytic domain, such as isoform-specific domains (1214). However, the paucity of crystallographic structural data and isoenzyme-specific assays has limited the development of novel effective and specific inhibitors (1517). Nevertheless, the isoform-specific inhibitors that are available are effective when combined with other therapies but show limited efficacy when used as monotherapies, ostensibly due to the compensatory upregulation of other ALDH enzymes (18). Thus, the use of multi-isoform ALDH inhibitors may represent a more powerful strategy. In addition, multi-ALDH inhibitors synergize with conventional treatments such as chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and radiotherapy, to inhibit disease progression and prevent the onset of resistance (18, 19). Furthermore, several strategies to improve bioavailability and reduce toxicity, such as novel nano-formulations and drug-delivery devices, are being analyzed in preclinical models. These approaches have been shown to reduce the incidence of off-target effects by improving both biodistribution and pharmacokinetics (20). Furthermore, ALDH inhibition may improve the ratio of effector T cells to Tregs within tumor tissue, leading to enhanced antitumor immunity, while simultaneously impacting ALDH-expressing cancer cells (10, 11). This intriguing approach may be particularly efficacious when combined with immunotherapy. Specifically, the inhibition of ALDH activity and ensuing reductions in RA availability in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may negatively influence Treg cell differentiation and activation, attenuating their immunosuppressive functions (21). Coupling ALDH inhibitors with PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade, for example, may also restore the activity of exhausted CD8+ effector T cells, thereby activating anti-tumor immunity. Therefore, dissecting the interactions between the myriad ALDH1A1-overexpressing cell types in the TME is critical for maximizing the efficacy of combinatorial approaches, enabling the inhibition of pro-tumor Tregs, and enhancing T cell-mediated tumor eradication (10, 11, 2123).

In summary, ALDH inhibitors may synergize with several conventional therapies to both inhibit disease progression and prevent the development of resistance (24). Given that combinations of standard treatments often represent the standard of care for cancer patients, the identification of novel complementary approaches, including those that incorporate ALDH inhibitors, is required to overcome recurrence and drug resistance.

Author contributions

BA wrote and revised the editorial. VM revised the editorial. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Chen CH, Kraemer BR, Lee L, Mochly-Rosen D. Annotation of 1350 common genetic variants of the 19 ALDH multigene family from global human genome aggregation database (gnomAD). Biomolecules. (2021) 11:1423. doi: 10.3390/biom11101423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Poturnajova M, Kozovska Z, Matuskova M. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 and 1A3 isoforms - mechanism of activation and regulation in cancer. Cell Signal. (2021) 87:110120. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhou L, Sheng D, Wang D, Ma W, Deng Q, Deng L, et al. Identification of cancer-type specific expression patterns for active aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) isoforms in ALDEFLUOR assay. Cell Biol Toxicol. (2019) 35:161–77. doi: 10.1007/s10565-018-9444-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Tomita H, Tanaka K, Tanaka T, Hara A. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 in stem cells and cancer. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:11018–32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zakaria N, Satar NA, Abu Halim NH, Ngalim SH, Yusoff NM, Lin J, et al. Targeting lung cancer stem cells: research and clinical impacts. Front Oncol. (2017) 7:80. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Masciale V, Grisendi G, Banchelli F, D'Amico R, Maiorana A, Sighinolfi P, et al. Isolation and identification of cancer stem-like cells in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a pilot study. Front Oncol. (2019) 9:1394. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Masciale V, Grisendi G, Banchelli F, D'Amico R, Maiorana A, Sighinolfi P, et al. CD44+/EPCAM+ cells detect a subpopulation of ALDHhigh cells in human non-small cell lung cancer: a chance for targeting cancer stem cells? Oncotarget. (2020) 11:1545–55. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yue H, Hu Z, Hu R, Guo Z, Zheng Y, Wang Y, et al. ALDH1A1 in cancers: bidirectional function, drug resistance, and regulatory mechanism. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:918778. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.918778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Yang L, Shi P, Zhao G, Xu J, Peng W, Zhang J, et al. Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy. Sig Transduct Target Ther. (2020) 5:8. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0110-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Bazewicz CG, Dinavahi SS, Schell TD, Robertson GP. Aldehyde dehydrogenase in regulatory T-cell development, immunity and cancer. Immunology. (2019) 156:47–55. doi: 10.1111/imm.13016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bayati F, Mohammadi M, Valadi M, Jamshidi S, Foma AM, Sharif-Paghaleh E. The therapeutic potential of regulatory T cells: challenges and opportunities. Front Immunol. (2021) 11:585819. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.585819

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Püschel J, Dubrovska A, Gorodetska I. The multifaceted role of aldehyde dehydrogenases in prostate cancer stem cells. Cancers. (2021) 13:4703. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184703

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Masciale V, Banchelli F, Grisendi G, D'Amico R, Maiorana A, Stefani A, et al. The influence of cancer stem cells on the risk of relapse in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a prospective cohort study. Stem Cells Transl Med. (2022) 11:239–47. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szab029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Masciale V, Banchelli F, Grisendi G, D'Amico R, Maiorana A, Stefani A, et al. Cancer stem cells and cell cycle genes as independent predictors of relapse in non-small cell lung cancer: secondary analysis of a prospective study. Stem Cells Transl Med. (2022) 11:797–804. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szac040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Li J, Garavaglia S, Ye Z, Moretti A, Belyaeva OV, Beiser A, et al. A specific inhibitor of ALDH1A3 regulates retinoic acid biosynthesis in glioma stem cells. Commun Biol. (2021) 4:1420. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02949-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zhong L, Li Y, Xiong L, Wang W, Wu M, Yuan T, et al. Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Sig Transduct Target Ther. (2021) 6:201. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00572-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Liu LK, Tanner JJ. Crystal structure of aldehyde dehydrogenase 16 reveals trans-hierarchical structural similarity and a new dimer. J Mol Biol. (2019) 431:524–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.11.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dinavahi SS, Bazewicz CG, Gowda R, Robertson GP. Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors for cancer therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2019) 40:774–89. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Muralikrishnan V, Fang F, Given TC, Podicheti R, Chtcherbinine M, Metcalfe TX, et al. A novel ALDH1A1 inhibitor blocks platinum-induced senescence and stemness in ovarian cancer. Cancers. (2022) 14:3437. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143437

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF, Campos EVR, Rodriguez-Torres MDP, Acosta-Torres LS, et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnol. (2018) 16:71. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wagner N, Wagner KD. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and the hallmarks of cancer. Cells. (2022) 11:2432. doi: 10.3390/cells11152432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R, et al. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2021) 20:101–24. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0090-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Balança CC, Salvioni A, Scarlata CM, Michelas M, Martinez-Gomez C, Gomez-Roca C, et al. PD-1 blockade restores helper activity of tumor-infiltrating, exhausted PD-1hiCD39+ CD4 T cells. JCI Insight. (2021) 6:e142513. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.142513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Koppaka V, Thompson DC, Chen Y, Ellermann M, Nicolaou KC, Juvonen RO, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors: a comprehensive review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, substrate specificity, and clinical application. Pharmacol Rev. (2012) 64:520–39. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), cancer stem cell (CSC), NSCLC, recurrence, nanoparticle

Citation: Aramini B and Masciale V (2023) Editorial: Aldehyde dehydrogenase in clinical settings: Potential biomarker and therapeutic target in solid tumors. Front. Med. 9:1116908. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1116908

Received: 05 December 2022; Accepted: 12 December 2022;
Published: 04 January 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Luigi M. Terracciano, University of Basel, Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Aramini and Masciale. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Beatrice Aramini, yes beatrice.aramini2@unibo.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.