AUTHOR=Liu Tao , Mi Junli , Wang Yafeng , Qiao Wenjie , Wang Chenxiang , Ma Zhijun , Wang Cheng TITLE=Establishment and validation of the survival prediction risk model for appendiceal cancer JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=9 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.1022595 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2022.1022595 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=Objective

Establishing a risk model of the survival situation of appendix cancer for accurately identifying high-risk patients and developing individualized treatment plans.

Methods

A total of 4,691 patients who were diagnosed with primary appendix cancer from 2010 to 2016 were extracted using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) * Stat software. The total sample size was divided into 3,283 cases in the modeling set and 1,408 cases in the validation set at a ratio of 7:3. A nomogram model based on independent risk factors that affect the prognosis of appendix cancer was established. Single-factor Cox risk regression, Lasso regression, and multifactor Cox risk regression were used for analyzing the risk factors that affect overall survival (OS) in appendectomy patients. A nomogram model was established based on the independent risk factors that affect appendix cancer prognosis, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve and calibration curve were used for evaluating the model. Survival differences between the high- and low-risk groups were analyzed through Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Single-factor Cox risk regression analysis found age, ethnicity, pathological type, pathological stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, number of lymph nodes removed, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, and CEA all to be risk factors for appendiceal OS. At the same time, multifactor Cox risk regression analysis found age, tumor stage, surgery, lymph node removal, T stage, N stage, M stage, and CEA to be independent risk factors for appendiceal OS. A nomogram model was established for the multifactor statistically significant indicators. Further stratified with corresponding probability values based on multifactorial Cox risk regression, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis found the low-risk group of the modeling and validation sets to have a significantly better prognosis than the high-risk group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The established appendix cancer survival model can be used for the prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and for the development of personalized treatment options through the identification of high-risk patients.