Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Med., 02 December 2021
Sec. Gastroenterology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Dark Side of Microscopic Colitis View all 5 articles

Editorial: The Dark Side of Microscopic Colitis

  • 1Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
  • 2Department of Medical-Surgical Physiopathology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • 3Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • 4Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
  • 5Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

Editorial on the Research Topic
The Dark Side of Microscopic Colitis

Microscopic colitis (MC) encompasses both collagenous colitis (CC) and lymphocytic colitis (LC). Patients report chronic, watery, non-bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and fatigue that may impair health-related quality of life (1). Over the last few years, the incidence and prevalence of this condition has risen, partly due to both greater awareness and increasing numbers of patients being diagnosed (25). Diagnosis of MC is by colonoscopy, and histological analysis of multiple biopsy specimens collected along the colon is used to assess activity (6, 7). However, heterogeneous immune profiles and disease characteristics among patients still make the pathogenesis of MC unclear (8, 9). Consequently, there is an emerging need for simple non-invasive tools that are also rapid, convenient, standardized and reproducible, for correct diagnosis and appropriate management during follow-up (10, 11).

In this Research Topic, experts in the field provide updated information on epidemiology, risk factors and therapy. They also propose key points for the identification of biomarkers and explore the immunological pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MC.

There are conflicting data on the epidemiology and risks factors for MC. Newer estimates of incidence in Europe and North America range from 0.6 to 16.4 cases per 100,000 person-years for CC, and from 0.6 to 16.0 cases per 100,000 person-years for LC (12). The incidence was higher in women than in men and increased with older age, demonstrating a peak between 60 and 80 years of age, in particular in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy and also in women using an oral contraceptive as reported by Mihaly et al. In their article, Oruganti et al. provide an overview of risk factors for MC identified in a cohort of 216 patients, confirming the association of MC with medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), statins and hormonal therapies, highlighting as a new risk factor the use of tricyclic antidepressants commonly prescribed in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Multiple prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies have shown a strong association between cigarette smoking and MC (odds ratio 2.12) (13) with a significantly higher risk among current smokers compared with never-smokers (OR of 2.99) (14). The risk attenuated among former smokers but remained significantly higher than never-smokers (14). No dietary factors have yet been shown to conclusively have an association between dietary factors and the risk of MC. Intakes of protein, carbohydrates, gluten, sucrose, saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids, fiber, and zinc were not associated with MC and also a diet quality index score based on adherence to dietary recommendations, failed to reveal any associated with risk of both CC and LC (15, 16). Only alcohol consumption was associated with increased risk of developing MC and risk appeared to be dose responsive and independent of other known risk factors for MC (13, 17, 18).

Treatment is guided by response to symptoms, with budesonide identified as the most effective drug to control MC (1921). Unfortunately, as reported by Mihaly et al. not enough data have been received from extensive trials on alternative drugs including immunomodulators, aminosalicylates, and biological treatment such as TNF-alpha antagonists and integrin inhibitors.

Patients with MC have a decreased risk of developing inflammation-associated colorectal cancer compared with patients with ulcerative colitis and with healthy individuals (12, 22). The reason behind this difference in risk remains unknown. The immune system can detect and remove malignant cells and many immunomodulatory molecules, including those involved in immune checkpoints (23). Lushnikova et al. examined whether increased immune surveillance in patients with MC could partly explain the lower observed risk of developing colorectal cancer, and reported systemically and locally altered levels of immunomodulatory molecules in patients with MC compared with controls. Further studies are needed to provide insights into the underlying mechanisms behind the seemingly protective effects of MC against colorectal cancer.

A more obscure field in MC is pathogenesis, whereby a dysregulated immune response to changes in the gut luminal environment in predisposed individuals results in uncontrolled chronic inflammation (9). However, increasing evidence has allowed researchers to examine a few key pathogenic mechanisms in the fields of genetics, the adaptive and innate immune response, and microRNA (8). Several alterations in the balance of different lymphocyte populations and cytokine profiles have been described in MC. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that lamina propria CD4+ T cells expressed the Th2 transcription factor GATA-3, whereas lamina propria CD8+ T cells expressed both GATA-3 and the Th1 transcription factor T-bet (24). Flow cytometry analyses and immunohistochemistry studies have shown heavy infiltration of CD8+ T cells in the mucosa of patients with CC and LC (25, 26). In their case report, Honjo et al. employed immunohistochemistry to analyse the association between disease activity and type of immune cell in the colonic mucosa, and found the active disease phase was characterized by the accumulation of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, FOXP3+ Tregs, and CD68+ macrophages in the colonic lamina propria. Paradoxically, induction of remission was accompanied by a marked reduction in the accumulation of FOXP3+ Tregs in the colonic mucosa.

Despite the huge expansion in the knowledge of MC, we are still far from understanding the full spectrum of events leading to LC and CC. One basis of uncertainty is the fact that forms of MC can transform into each other and into classical inflammatory bowel disease, and that genetic similarities with IBD can be detected. One of the largest obstacles is the overwhelming complexity of diagnosis, treatment and management. In order to move forward, it is important to integrate the huge amount of basic and clinical data available in order to provide insights into the complexity and variability of MC. In few years, we expect that sharing of big data and machine-learning algorithms will integrate the wealth of available preclinical and clinical data with omics data (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics), shedding new light on MC and promoting an improved and personalized clinical approach to patients. Overall, we are very pleased to have worked on this Research Topic. All the authors have provided innovative and outstanding contributions which will certainly stimulate new research and advances in the MC field.

Author Contributions

LFP, GT, and LP conceived and wrote the editorial, approved the final version, and fully agree with its content.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Lindstrom CG. 'Collagenous colitis' with watery diarrhoea–a new entity? Pathol Euro. (1976) 11:87–9.

PubMed Abstract

2. Pardi DS, Loftus EV Jr, Smyrk TC, Kammer PP, Tremaine WJ, Schleck CD, et al. The epidemiology of microscopic colitis: a population based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gut. (2007) 56:504–8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.105890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tome J, Sehgal K, Kamboj AK, Harmsen WS, Kammer PP, Loftus EV, et al. The epidemiology of microscopic colitis in Olmsted county, Minnesota: population-based study from 2011 to 2019. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) S1542-3565(21)00691-1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.027. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Guagnozzi D, Tontini GE, Pastorelli L. Editorial: the increasing burden of microscopic colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2019) 50:228–9. doi: 10.1111/apt.15363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Fernández-Bañares F, Casanova MJ, Arguedas Y, Beltrán B, Busquets D, Fernández JM, et al. Current concepts on microscopic colitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations of the Spanish microscopic colitis group. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2016) 43:400–26. doi: 10.1111/apt.13477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

6. Langner C, Aust D, Ensari A, Villanacci V, Becheanu G, Miehlke S, et al. Histology of microscopic colitis-review with a practical approach for pathologists. Histopathology. (2015) 66:613–26. doi: 10.1111/his.12592

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Olsen LM, Engel PJH, Goudkade D, Villanacci V, Thagaard J, Walbech JS, et al. Histological disease activity in patients with microscopic colitis is not related to clinical disease activity or long-term prognosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2021) 54:43–52. doi: 10.1111/apt.16381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Pisani LF, Tontini GE, Vecchi M, Pastorelli L. Microscopic colitis: what do we know about pathogenesis? Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2016) 22:450–8. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zabana Y, Tontini G, Hultgren-Hornquist E, Skonieczna-Zydecka K, Latella G, Ostvik AE, et al. Pathogenesis of microscopic colitis: a systematic review. J Crohns Colitis. (2021) jjab123. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab123. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Pisani LF, Tontini GE, Marinoni B, Villanacci V, Bruni B, Vecchi M, et al. Biomarkers and microscopic colitis: an unmet need in clinical practice. Front Med. (2017) 4:54. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lesnovska KP, Munch A, Hjortswang H. The process of developing a disease activity index in microscopic colitis. J Crohns Colitis. (2021) jjab170. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab170. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Miehlke S, Guagnozzi D, Zabana Y, Tontini GE, Kanstrup Fiehn AM, Wildt S, et al. European guidelines on microscopic colitis: United European gastroenterology and European microscopic colitis group statements and recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J. (2021) 9:13–37. doi: 10.1177/2050640620951905

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yen EF, Pokhrel B, Du H, Nwe S, Bianchi L, Witt B, et al. Current and past cigarette smoking significantly increase risk for microscopic colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2012) 18:1835–41. doi: 10.1002/ibd.22838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Jaruvongvanich V, Poonsombudlert K, Ungprasert P. Smoking and risk of microscopic colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2019) 25:672–8. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Larsson JK, Sonestedt E, Ohlsson B, Manjer J, Sjoberg K. The association between the intake of specific dietary components and lifestyle factors and microscopic colitis. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2016) 70:1309–17. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Liu PH, Lebwohl B, Burke KE, Ivey KL, Ananthakrishnan AN, Lochhead P, et al. Dietary gluten intake and risk of microscopic colitis among us women without celiac disease: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. (2019) 114:127–34. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0267-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Niccum B, Casey K, Burke K, Lopes EW, Lochhead P, Ananthakrishnan A, et al. Alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of microscopic colitis: results from 2 prospective US cohort studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2021) 26:797–808. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Roth B, Gustafsson RJ, Jeppsson B, Manjer J, Ohlsson B. Smoking- and alcohol habits in relation to the clinical picture of women with microscopic colitis compared to controls. BMC Womens Health. (2014) 14:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kafil TS, Nguyen TM, Patton PH, MacDonald JK, Chande N, McDonald JW. Interventions for treating collagenous colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 11:CD003575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003575.pub6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chande N, Al Yatama N, Bhanji T, Nguyen TM, McDonald JW, MacDonald JK. Interventions for treating lymphocytic colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 7:CD006096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006096.pub4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Munch A, Mihaly E, Nagy F, Madisch A, Kupcinskas J, Miehlke S, et al. Budesonide as induction therapy for incomplete microscopic colitis: a randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. United European Gastroenterol J. (2021) 9:837–47. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kamboj AK, Zylberberg HM, Lane CM, Voth E, Tome J, Cuir ND, et al. Microscopic colitis and risk of colon adenomas: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) S1542-3565(21)00589-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.050. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Tontini GE, Pastorelli L, Spina L, Fabris F, Bruni B, Clemente C, et al. Microscopic colitis and colorectal neoplastic lesion rate in chronic nonbloody diarrhea: a prospective, multicenter study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. (2014) 20:882–91. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Johrens K, Grunbaum M, Anagnostopoulos I. Differences in the T-bet and GATA-3 expression patterns between lymphocytic colitis and coeliac disease. Virchows Arch. (2010) 457:451–6. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-0961-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Goranzon C, Kumawat AK, Hultgren-Hornqvist E, Tysk C, Eriksson S, Bohr J, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of lymphocytes in microscopic colitis. J Crohns Colitis. (2013) 7:e434–42. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kumawat AK, Strid H, Elgbratt K, Tysk C, Bohr J, Hultgren Hörnquist E. Microscopic colitis patients have increased proportions of Ki67(+) proliferating and CD45RO(+) active/memory CD8(+) and CD4(+)8(+) mucosal T cells. J Crohns Colitis. (2013) 7:694–705. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: microscopic colitis, collagenous colitis, lymphocytic colitis, inflammation, inflammatory pathway, epidemiology

Citation: Pisani LF, Tontini GE and Pastorelli L (2021) Editorial: The Dark Side of Microscopic Colitis. Front. Med. 8:809136. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.809136

Received: 04 November 2021; Accepted: 16 November 2021;
Published: 02 December 2021.

Edited and reviewed by: Giuseppe Losurdo, University of Bari Medical School, Italy

Copyright © 2021 Pisani, Tontini and Pastorelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Laura Francesca Pisani, laurafrancesca.pisani@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.