AUTHOR=Li Jinze , Cao Dehong , Meng Chunyang , Xia Zhongyou , Peng Lei , Li Yunxiang , Wei Qiang 

TITLE=Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy and Endoscopic Enucleation of Prostate for Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine

VOLUME=8

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.773257

DOI=10.3389/fmed.2021.773257

ISSN=2296-858X

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are the two most commonly used methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but it remains unclear which of the two is superior. This study aims to perform a pooled analysis to compare efficacy and safety profiles between MISP and EEP.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ClinicalTrials.gov" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link> databases to identify eligible studies comparing MISP with EEP. Parameters including efficacy and safety outcomes were compared using Stata 14.0 version.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Eight comparative trials with 1,504 patients were included. Compared to MISP, EEP demonstrated shorter operative time (mean difference [MD] 46.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.92 to 72.82, <italic>p</italic> = 0.0006), lesser hemoglobin decrease (standardized MD [SMD] 0.59, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), lower catheterization time (SMD 4.13, 95% CI 2.16 to 6.10, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and shorter length of stay (SMD 2.38, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.36, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). However, overall complications and blood transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Moreover, EEP had better postvoid residual volume (PVR) at 6-month (MD 14.39, 95% CI 11.06 to 17.72, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and comparable 3- and 6-month International Prostate Symptom Score, 3- and 6-month maximum flow rate, 3-month PVR, and 3-month quality of life compared with MISP.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> Both MISP and EEP are effective and safe surgical procedures for the treatment of large BPH. EEP appears to have a superior perioperative profile compared to MISP. This should be interpreted with caution due to the significant heterogeneity between studies. Hence, treatment selection should be based on the surgeon's experience and availability.</p>