Case Report: Oral Cimetidine Administration Causes Drug-Induced Immune Hemolytic Anemia by Eliciting the Production of Cimetidine-Dependent Antibodies and Drug-Independent Non-specific Antibodies

Previously, it was reported that multiple patients had hemolytic anemia associated with cimetidine administration, while only one patient who had received intravenous cimetidine was serologically diagnosed with drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) caused by cimetidine-dependent antibodies. However, the ability of oral cimetidine intake to induce the production of antibodies has not been examined. In this study, we report a 44-year-old male patient in whom oral cimetidine administration resulted in cimetidine-dependent antibodies and drug-independent non-specific antibodies, leading to the development of DIIHA. Serological tests showed that the results of direct antiglobulin test (DAT) for anti-IgG (3+) and anti-C3d (1+) were positive. The IgM and IgG cimetidine-dependent antibodies (the highest total titer reached 4,096) were detected in the plasma incubated with O-type RBCs and 1 mg/mL cimetidine or the plasma incubated with cimetidine-coated RBCs. IgG-type drug-independent non-specific antibodies were detected in blood samples collected at days 13, 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake. This is the first study to report that oral administration of cimetidine can elicit the production of cimetidine-dependent antibodies, leading to DIIHA, and the production of drug-independent non-specific antibodies, resulting in hemolytic anemia independent of cimetidine. Presence of pathogenic antibodies were detectable longer than 41 days. This suggests that patients with DIIHA caused by cimetidine need to be given necessary medical monitoring within 41 days after cimetidine intake.

Introduction

More than 140 drugs are associated with drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) (1–9). The pathogenic mechanism of DIIHA involves the damage of red blood cells (RBCs) by drug-induced (drug-dependent and –independent) antibodies or non-immune protein adsorption (NIPA) (10–13). NIPA, which can be detected based on the positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) result, leads to slow, mild, or almost undetectable hemolysis (13–15). Most cases of DIIHA are reported to be caused by drug-induced antibodies (12). DIIHA is diagnosed based on the manifestation of hemolysis after drug treatment and the detection of target drug-induced antibodies (12).

Cimetidine binds competitively with histamine H₂ receptors on parietal cells in the gastric wall and consequently inhibits gastric acid secretion. Hence, cimetidine has been widely used for treating gastric and duodenal ulcers and reflux esophagitis, as well as for preventing stress ulcers. Based on the immunomodulatory effect of cimetidine, it has been used in the treatment of warts, ulceration, and mastocytosis in dermatology (16, 17). Cimetidine has been shown to inhibit heme biosynthesis and results in symptomatic improvement in patients with acute intermittent porphyria and porphyria cutanea tarda. In recent years, cimetidine has been used as a new method of erythropoietic protoporphyria treatment (18). Cimetidine tablets and capsules have been used commonly as non-prescription drugs without medical supervision (19).

Since 1979, several cases of immune hemolytic anemia (IHA) related to cimetidine have been reported (20–23). However, none of these cases have been tested for cimetidine-related drug-dependent antibodies. In 2010, Arndt et al. (24) reported that a 63-year-old female patient with metastatic breast cancer developed hemolytic anemia after receiving intravenous cimetidine twice. Cimetidine-dependent antibodies were detected in the serum of the patient. This was the first reported case of cimetidine-associated DIIHA that was confirmed using serological tests. However, it is unclear whether oral cimetidine can also induce the production of cimetidine-dependent antibodies and subsequently cause DIIHA.

Here, we report that a 44-year-old male patient developed severe hemolytic anemia after oral administration of cimetidine. Cimetidine-dependent antibodies were detected by incubating the patient's plasma with O-type RBCs and 1 mg/mL cimetidine or incubating the patient's plasma with cimetidine-coated RBCs at 37°C, with the highest titer reaching 4,096. Drug-independent non-specific antibodies (the highest titer reached 32) were also detected. This is the second case study to serologically diagnose DIIHA caused by cimetidine-dependent antibodies. Additionally, this is the first study to report that oral cimetidine can elicit the production of cimetidine-dependent antibodies and cause DIIHA. The findings of this study indicated that the oral administration of cimetidine can also induce the production of drug-independent non-specific antibodies, which caused positive DAT results and IHA for a prolonged period in the absence of cimetidine.

Patient Information

A 44-year-old male who suffered from an episode of gout (metabolic arthritis) consumed the following non-prescription drugs: diclofenac sodium sustained-release capsule (50 mg) and cimetidine capsule (200 mg). The joint pain was alleviated after medication but the patient exhibited fatigue and anorexia. Three days after drug intake, fatigue exacerbated, urine turned yellowish-brown, and the skin and sclera exhibited yellowish color. Four days after drug intake, the subject was admitted to the Dongguan Tungwah Hospital. The clinical characteristics of the patient were as follows: blood type, A/RhCcDee; glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity, physiological levels; expression of CD55 and CD59 on RBCs, physiological levels; thalassemia gene screening and acid hemolysis test results, no abnormalities; sucrose hemolysis test and urine hemosiderin test results, positive; bone marrow cytology, extremely active hyperplasia; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clone, not detected. Color ultrasound examination revealed diffuse fatty change in the liver. The detailed results of cell and biochemical tests of blood samples collected at days 4, 6, 13, 16, 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake are listed in Figure 1 (Case report timeline).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Case report timeline. DIIHA, drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia; WRBCs, washed red blood cells; LRBCs, leukocyte-reduced red blood cells. +, strong; ±, slightly strong. Red blood cells lifespan: the average survival time of red blood cells measured by using the open-breath CO breath test.

Five days after drug intake, the patient began to undergo continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Six days after drug intake, the patient was transfused with washed RBCs (WRBCs) prepared from 600 mL of A/RhCcDee whole blood. Seven days after drug intake, the patient was transfused with WRBCs prepared from 300 mL of A/RhCcDee whole blood. Eight days after drug intake, the patient underwent exchange transfusion: 2,000 mL of A-type fresh frozen plasma was used as the replacement fluid for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and the same amount of RBCs was replaced with leukocyte-reduced RBCs (LRBCs) prepared from 1,200 mL of A/RhCcDee whole blood. Fourteen days after drug intake, CRRT was stopped and prednisone (50 mg) was prescribed daily for 5 consecutive days. The patient was prescribed prednisone for 7 more days after discharge. Sixteen days after discharge (equivalent to 34 days after oral drug intake), oral prednisone (20 mg) was administered daily for seven consecutive days. Twenty-three days after discharge (equivalent to 41 days post-oral drug intake), the subject resumed routine life and work.

The patient had a history of gout for 3 years and was prescribed intermittent oral diclofenac sodium for pain relief. Additionally, the patient had no history of anemia or other chronic diseases and had not previously undergone blood transfusion. Furthermore, the patient took oral diclofenac sodium (50 mg) for pain relief due to a gout attack 10 months ago. At the same time, the patient also took one cimetidine capsule (200 mg) without any adverse reactions. The medical records of the patient did not indicate intravenous administration of cimetidine. According to the patient's statement, this was the second time cimetidine had been administered before admission.

Assessment, Therapeutic, and Follow-Up

The patient was diagnosed with acute liver and kidney damage. Five days after drug intake, the patient underwent CRRT. During CRRT, WRBCs prepared from 900 ml of whole blood were transfused, and a blood exchange transfusion was given. Because the patient's liver and kidney functions have been significantly improved, CRRT was terminated on the 14th day after drug intake. After that, the patient returned to normal life and work after two courses of oral prednisone treatment. However, the patient's blood cells and biochemical indicators did not completely restore to normal levels until the 82nd day after drug intake.

Timeline

The timeline of the patient's overall disease course and treatment process is shown in Figure 1.

Definite diagnosis Based on Serological Testing

The venous blood samples were collected on days 6, 13, 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake. Serological analysis including DAT for anti-IgG and for anti-C3d, acid elution test, irregular RBC antibody screening with saline in a tube and indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) in Coombs card were conducted on the patient's blood samples. As described by Leger et al. (25), Diclofenac sodium, cimetidine solutions, and the respective drug-coated RBCs were used to detect drug-dependent antibodies.

The DAT results for anti-IgG and anti-C3d were positive for all the venous blood samples collected on days 6, 13, 34, and 41 post-drug intake. However, on day 82 post-drug intake, the DAT results for IgG were positive while anti-C3d was negative. The results of irregular RBC antibody screening showed that IgG-type drug-independent non-specific antibodies were detected in the patient's plasma obtained from the blood samples collected on days 13, 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake, and the acid eluent obtained from the blood samples collected on days 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake. The detailed results of DAT and irregular RBC antibody screening are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Results of DAT and irregular RBC antibodies detection in plasma and acid eluent.

To test for drug-dependent antibodies we tested: (1) diclofenac sodium solution incubated with O-type WRBCs and the patient's plasma at 37°C for 1 h, (2) diclofenac sodium solution incubated with O-type WRBCs and the patient's red blood cell acid eluent at 37°C for 1 h, and (3) the patient's plasma or the acid eluent was incubated with diclofenac sodium-coated RBCs at 37°C for 1 h. No diclofenac-dependent antibodies were detected in all blood samples of the patient. However, when cimetidine solution was incubated with O-type WRBCs and the patient's plasma at 37°C for 1 h, or the patient's plasma was incubated with cimetidine-coated RBCs at 37°C for 1 h, cimetidine-dependent antibodies were detected in all blood samples of the patient. Antibodies titers detected by the two methods were the same. Further experiments indicated that the cimetidine-dependent antibodies comprised IgM and IgG. Based on the above test results, the patient was diagnosed with DIIHA caused by cimetidine. Table 2 shows the detailed results of the detection of cimetidine-dependent antibodies in samples with 1 mg/mL cimetidine solution.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Test results of cimetidine-dependent antibody with RBCs and 1 mg/mL cimetidine solution (agglutination and titer).

Cimetidine powder was used to prepare aqueous solutions at multiple concentrations. Then, cimetidine solutions were incubated with O-type RBCs at 37°C or room temperature for 1 h to prepare cimetidine-coated RBCs. Additionally, O-type RBCs were incubated with cimetidine injection at multiple concentrations at 37°C or room temperature for 1 h to prepare cimetidine-coated RBCs; some RBCs hemolyzed (Table 3). All unhemolyzed cimetidine-coated RBCs were used to detect cimetidine-dependent antibodies. Table 4 shows the agglutination titers of the untreated plasma or 2-Mercaptoethanol (2ME)-treated plasma obtained from the blood samples collected on day 6 post-drug intake incubated with cimetidine-coated RBCs prepared under different conditions for 1 h at 37°C (centrifugation in a test tube or centrifugation in a Coombs card did not show hemolysis). The test results suggest that the cimetidine-coated RBCs prepared by incubating 30 or 20 mg/mL cimetidine solution with RBCs at room temperature for 1 h had the same sensitivity as that in 1 mg/mL cimetidine solution for detecting cimetidine-dependent antibodies.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Appearance of cimetidine-coated RBCs prepared by mixing different dosage forms and different concentrations of cimetidine with O-type RBCs and incubating at 37°C or room temperature for 1 h.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Results of cimetidine-dependent antibodies titers detection with cimetidine-coated RBCs for the sample collected at 6 days after the patient oral administration of diclofenac sodium and cimetidine.

Discussion

The male patient had no history of anemia and blood transfusion but was diagnosed with severe hyperbilirubinemia and hemolytic anemia within 4 days of oral administration of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and cimetidine (200 mg) along with hepatic and renal damages. Although the color ultrasound examination revealed a diffuse fatty change in the liver, the patient had no history of hepatic insufficiency or jaundice. Drugs can potentially aggravate liver damage and hyperbilirubinemia and upregulate the levels of liver enzymes. However, drug-induced liver damage does not rapidly develop into hemolytic anemia. G6PD deficiency can induce acute hemolysis by oxidizing food or drugs (26–29). A five-year retrospective study by Hagag et al. (29) demonstrated that diclofenac sodium is one of the most common drugs that induce acute hemolysis in patients with G6PD deficiency. In this study, the patient exhibited physiological levels of G6PD activity. This indicated that hemolytic anemia was not caused by G6PD deficiency. The patient also exhibited some clinical characteristics of PNH. However, cytological analysis of bone marrow revealed that the RBCs exhibited physiological expression levels of CD55 and CD59. Thus, PNH-induced hemolytic anemia was ruled out (30–32).

The results of DAT for anti-IgG and anti-C3d of the patient after oral administration of diclofenac sodium and cimetidine were all positive. These results were partially consistent with the serological characteristics of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) (33–37) and DIIHA (10–12). As no RBC antibodies were detected in the plasma and acid eluent during the severe hemolysis period, AIHA was ruled out (33–37). Previous studies have reported diclofenac-induced (2, 38–41) or cimetidine-induced (2, 24) DIIHA. This study subject had a history of gout for 3 years and had intermittently consumed diclofenac sodium for pain relief. The patient had consumed cimetidine capsules and diclofenac sodium for gout attacks 10 months ago. This indicated that diclofenac sodium or cimetidine may be etiological agents for DIIHA.

We collected the remaining two drug capsules from the patient to prepare drug solutions and drug-coated RBCs. Drug-coated RBCs or RBCs incubated with the drug solution were used to detect the presence of diclofenac-dependent or cimetidine-dependent antibodies in the plasma. The antibody may be directed against the non-target drug component in the powder in the capsule instead of the target drug. To rule this out, a drug solution was also prepared using cimetidine solution used for injections. The cimetidine-dependent antibodies were detected in the plasma. In contrast, diclofenac-dependent antibodies were not detected in the plasma. After the cessation of cimetidine, the patient received CRRT, blood transfusion, exchange blood, and prednisone treatment. Based on alanine transaminase (normal range ≤41 U/L) and creatinine (normal range 62–106 umol/L), the hepatic and renal functions were significantly improved 13 and 16 days after cimetidine intake. The hemoglobin levels began to increase 16 days after cimetidine intake without blood transfusion. These clinical manifestations and serological findings indicated that the cimetidine-dependent antibodies produced by the patient after oral administration of cimetidine caused DIIHA. As the patient exhibited a diffuse fatty change in the liver, liver compensatory function was reduced. Additionally, hemolysis further aggravated liver damage and consequently resulted in hyperbilirubinemia and elevated liver enzymes. The patient had no history of kidney disease. Thus, renal damage may be due to hemolysis.

Several studies have reported cases of cimetidine-induced immunohemolytic anemia. However, only one patient was serologically confirmed to be a case of DIIHA caused by cimetidine-dependent antibodies (24). The ability of oral cimetidine to elicit the production of cimetidine-dependent antibodies and consequently cause DIIHA has not been previously examined. The clinical pharmacokinetic analysis of cimetidine revealed that 70% of oral cimetidine enters the blood circulation and that the chemical structure is not modified (42). This is the first study to demonstrate that oral cimetidine can produce cimetidine-dependent antibodies and cause DIIHA.

Drug-induced antibodies include drug-dependent antibodies and drug-independent antibodies (12, 25). Among more than 140 drugs that have been reported to cause DIIHA, most drug-dependent antibodies can be detected with drug-coated RBCs and/or RBCs incubated with soluble drug solutions (2, 25). Drug-independent antibodies, which are difficult to be distinguished from warm auto-antibodies, can be detected with RBC antibody screening tests without drug solutions or drug-coated RBCs (2, 25). The drug-dependent antibody test was established by Leger et al. (25) and the concentration of the drug solution used in this test is 1 mg/mL. To coat the RBCs, the RBCs are incubated with 40 mg/mL drug solution at 37°C for 1 h (except for preparing penicillin-coated RBCs). However, Arndt et al. (24) reported that the incubation of RBCs with 40 mg/mL cimetidine at 37°C for 1 h resulted in severe hemolysis and that this method does not yield a sufficient number of cimetidine-coated RBCs that can be used to detect cimetidine-dependent antibodies. Hence, cimetidine-coated RBCs were prepared by incubating RBCs with 15 mg/mL cimetidine at room temperature for 1 h. These RBCs did not undergo hemolysis and can be used to detect cimetidine-dependent antibodies.

The direct agglutination titer of the plasma (collected on day 6 post-oral cimetidine intake) and uncoated O-type RBCs in the presence of 1 mg/mL cimetidine solution was 256, while added to the Coombs card as 2,048. The direct agglutination test of the 2ME-treated plasma yielded negative results. The agglutination titer added to the Coombs card was 1,024. This indicated that the cimetidine-dependent antibodies comprised both IgM and IgG components. The cimetidine-coated RBCs prepared by incubating 30 or 20 mg/mL cimetidine solution with RBCs at room temperature for 1 h had a high sensitivity for detecting cimetidine-dependent antibodies. The Ig types and titers of cimetidine-dependent antibodies detected in the plasma were consistent with the results of examining cimetidine-dependent antibodies in the presence of cimetidine solution. Therefore, we recommend that 20–30 mg/mL cimetidine solution incubated with RBCs at room temperature is ideal for preparing cimetidine-coated RBCs for the detection of cimetidine-dependent antibodies.

This study also used Coombs card to detect drug-independent non-specific antibodies. The titers of drug-independent non-specific antibodies in plasma samples collected on days 13, 34, 41, and 82 post-drug intake were 1, 32, 16, and 8, respectively. However, drug-independent antibodies were not detected using the saline tube test. The serological properties of drug-independent non-specific antibodies were similar to those of non-specific warm auto-antibodies. We speculate that the patient who developed IHA after receiving cimetidine treatment reported by Rotoli et al. (20) could be a case of cimetidine-induced AIHA caused by drug-independent non-specific antibodies.

Currently, there are not effective therapeutic strategies for DIIHA. The discontinuation of related drugs is essential to avoid further hemolysis (43). In this study, patient with cimetidine-induced DIIHA was prescribed prednisone, CRRT, TPE, and RBC exchange treatments, which achieved immediate satisfactory effects. However, the hemoglobin levels had increased to 97 g/L when the patient returned to the clinic 16 days after discharge (34 days post-cimetidine intake) although liver enzymes and renal function had returned to physiological levels. Moreover, the titer of cimetidine-dependent antibody increased from 2,048 (before discharge) to 4,096 (after discharge). Additionally, the titer of drug-independent non-specific antibodies increased from 1 (before discharge) to 32 (after discharge). Furthermore, the results of DAT for anti-IgG were stronger after than before discharge, with an RBC lifespan of 22 days. The levels of total bilirubin and lactate dehydrogenase were higher than the reference physiological level, while the reticulocyte proportion was 4.1%. This suggested that the patient exhibited hemolytic anemia. Based on the previous understanding of DIIHA, drug-dependent antibodies can cause hemolysis only when the related drugs are in circulation. The hemolysis is alleviated when the drugs in the circulating blood are completely metabolized and all the RBCs that are bound with the drug-dependent antibody-related drug are hemolyzed. The elimination half-life of cimetidine is only 2 h (42). Hence, cimetidine must have been eliminated from the bloodstream after 34 days of cimetidine intake. Moreover, the RBCs with bound cimetidine should have been completely hemolyzed. Therefore, the occurrence of hemolysis even after 34 days of cimetidine intake should not be related to cimetidine-dependent antibodies. Instead, hemolysis may be related to the first detection of the drug-independent non-specific antibodies 13 days after cimetidine intake. The drug-independent non-specific antibodies that continue to increase after discharge from the hospital bind to RBCs and yield positive DAT results. Thus, cimetidine-independent IHA and positive DAT result can persist for a prolonged period. The titers of both cimetidine-dependent antibodies and drug-independent non-specific antibodies decreased 41 days after the cessation of cimetidine and the patient returned to routine life and work. The hemoglobin levels returned to physiological levels 82 days after the cessation of cimetidine. The duration of anti-IgG positive DAT results remains to be followed up.

Drugs administered intravenously can bind to RBCs. And in the reported cases, there is more DIIHA related to intravenous administration than DIIHA related to oral administration (1–12). However, many drugs enter the blood circulation through oral administration, the molecular structure and chemical properties of the drugs have not changed. And it has been reported that the metabolites of drugs can also cause DIIHA (25). There is currently no evidence that the risk of DIIHA from oral administration is lower than that of intravenous administration.

Conclusions

This study reported the second case of DIIHA caused by cimetidine-dependent antibodies, which was confirmed using serological methods. Additionally, this is the first study to report that oral cimetidine can elicit the production of cimetidine-dependent antibodies and cause DIIHA. Cimetidine-dependent antibodies can be detected using RBCs incubated with cimetidine solution or cimetidine-coated RBCs. We recommended incubating O-type RBCs with 20–30 mg/mL cimetidine solution at room temperature for 1 h to prepare cimetidine-coated RBCs for the detection of cimetidine-dependent antibodies. The findings of this study indicated that the oral administration of cimetidine can also induce the production of drug-independent non-specific antibodies, which led to positive DAT results and IHA independent of cimetidine that persisted for a prolonged period. Patients with DIIHA induced by cimetidine may necessitate clinical management plans including longer monitoring and appropriate tests even after cessation of cimetidine administration.

Patient Perspective

The patient was shocked when he was told that he had developed cimetidine-related antibodies and that the oral administration of cimetidine caused severe hemolytic anemia. The patient said he would listen to the doctor's advice that he would no longer receive cimetidine administration in any way. Doctor's explanations have relieved him from psychological burden by the long-term damage of DIIHA.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Dongguan Tungwah Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The patient signed the informed consent and agreed to publish the findings about his case.

Author Contributions

YJW, YW, and YLJ contributed to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, and manuscript draft preparation. YJW, YHL, and JJL prepared the draft and final manuscripts. DSW monitored the patient and conducted the treatment. YJW, YW, YLJ, GPG, and BCC performed the immunohematological test. All authors contributed to the study design, result interpretation, and preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by two Key Project of Social and Scientific Development of Dongguan in 2019 (201950715046181 and 201950715007214).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

IHA, immune hemolytic anemia; DIIHA, drug-induced immune haemolytic anaemia; AIHA, autoimmune hemolytic anemia; DAT, direct antiglobulin test; NIPA, non-immunologic protein adsorption; RBC, red blood cell; RBCs, red blood cells; WRBCs, washed red blood cells; LRBCs, leukocyte-reduced red blood cells; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; TPE, therapeutic plasma exchange; 2ME, 2-Mercaptoethanol.

References

1. Garratty G. Immune hemolytic anemia associated with drug therapy. Blood Rev. (2010) 24:143–50. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2010.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Garratty G, Arndt PA. Drugs that have been shown to cause drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia or positive direct antiglobulin tests: some interesting findings since 2007. Immunohematology. (2014) 30:66–79. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2019-100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Quintanilla-Bordás C, Castro-Izaguirre E, Carcelén-Gadea M, Marín M. The first reported case of drug-induced hemolytic anemia caused by dimethyl fumarate in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Transfusion. (2019) 59:1648–50. doi: 10.1111/trf.15151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chan M, Silverstein WK, Nikonova A, Pavenski K, Hicks LK. Bendamustine-induced immune hemolytic anemia: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Blood Adv. (2020) 4:1756–9. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Burgos Pratx L, Santoro D, Coca Mogro B, Valiente VL, Camino P, Scordo W, et al. Etoricoxib-induced immune hemolytic anemia: first case presenting acute kidney failure. Transfusion. (2019) 59:1657–60. doi: 10.1111/trf.15226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lin KS, Win S, Nyein PP. Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia because of efavirenz: a case report. AIDS. (2020) 34:326–8. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002425

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Nguyen TN, Maenulein E, Fihman V, Vinatier I, Klaren JM. Serologic characteristics of oxaliplatin antibodies in 15 patients with drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia. Transfusion. (2021) 61:1609–16. doi: 10.1111/trf.16360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Afra F, Mehri M, Namazi S. Bosentan-induced immune hemolytic anemia in 17 years old man. A case report. Daru. (2021) 29:211–5. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00386-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wu Y, Wu Y, Ji Y, Liang J, He Z, Liu Y, et al. Case report: drug-induced immune haemolytic anaemia caused by cefoperazone-tazobactam/ sulbactam combination therapy. Front Med. (2021) 8:697192. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.697192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Garratty G, Arndt PA. An update on drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia. Immunohematology. (2007) 23:105–19. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2019-328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Garratty G. Immune hemolytic anemia caused by drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf. (2012) 11:635–42. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2012.678832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Arndt PA. Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia: the last 30 years of changes. Immunohematology. (2014) 30:44–54. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2019-098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Garratty G, Arndt PA. Positive direct antiglobulin tests and haemolytic anaemia following therapy with beta-lactamase inhibitor containing drugs may be associated with nonimmunologic adsorption of protein onto red blood cells. Br J Haematol. (1998) 100:777–83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00615.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Arndt PA, Leger RM, Garratty G. Positive direct antiglobulin tests and haemolytic anaemia following therapy with the beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam, may also be associated with non-immunologic adsorption of protein onto red blood cells. Vox Sang. (2003) 85:53. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00323.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Arndt P, Garratty G, Isaak E, Bolger M, Lu Q. Positive direct and indirect antiglobulin tests associated with oxaliplatin can be due to drug antibody and/or drug-induced nonimmunologic protein adsorption. Transfusion. (2009) 49:711–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02028.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Das BB, Anton K, Soares N, Riojas S, Mcdermott J, Knox L, et al. Cimetidine: a safe treatment option for cutaneous warts in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Med Sci (Basel). (2018) 6:30. doi: 10.3390/medsci6020030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Jafarzadeh A, Nemati M, Khorramdelazad H, Hassan ZM. Immunomodulatory properties of cimetidine: its therapeutic potentials for treatment of immune-related diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. (2019) 70:156–66. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.02.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Tu JH, Sheu SL, Teng JM. Novel treatment using cimetidine for erythropoietic protoporphyria in children. JAMA Dermatol. (2016) 152:1258–61. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lam JR, Schneider JL, Zhao W, Corley DA. Proton pump inhibitor and histamine 2 receptor antagonist use and vitamin B12 deficiency. JAMA. (2013) 310:2435–2442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280490

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Rotoli B, Formisano S, Alfinito F. Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia associated with cimetidine. Lancet. (1979) 2:583. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)91637-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rate R, Bonnell M, Chervenak C, Pavinich G. Cimetidine and hematologic effects. Ann Intern Med. (1979) 91:795. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-5-795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Petz LD, Gitlin N, Grant K, Rodvien R, Brotman M. Cimetidine-induced hemolytic anemia: the fallacy of clinical associations. J Clin Gastroenterol. (1983) 5:405–9. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198310000-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Tan-Ngamtrong D, Hitanant S, Vanasin B. Auto-immune hemolytic anemia during treatment with cimetidine. J Med Assoc Thai. (1987) 70:156–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. Arndt PA, Garratty G, Brasfield FM, Vemuri SL, Asuncion DJ. Immune hemolytic anemia due to cimetidine: the first example of a cimetidine antibody. Transfusion. (2010) 50:302–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02447.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Leger RM, Arndt PA, Garratty G. How we investigate drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia. Immunohematology. (2014) 30:85–94. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2019-102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. La Vieille S, Lefebvre DE, Khalid AF, Decan MR, Godefroy S. Dietary restrictions for people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Nutr Rev. (2019) 77:96–106. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Beauverd Y, Adam Y, Assouline B, Samii K. COVID-19 infection and treatment with hydroxychloroquine cause severe haemolysis crisis in a patient with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Eur J Haematol. (2020) 105:357–9. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Moiz B, Ali SA. Fulminant hemolysis in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Clin Case Rep. (2018) 6:224–5. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Hagag AA, Badraia IM, Elfarargy MS, Abd Elmageed MM, Abo-Ali EA. Study of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: 5 years retrospective Egyptian study. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. (2018) 18:155–62. doi: 10.2174/1871530317666171003160350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Parker CJ. Update on the diagnosis and management of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. (2016) 2016:208–16. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hill A, DeZern AE, Kinoshita T, Brodsky RA. Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17028. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.28

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Olutogun T, Cutini I, Notaro R, Luzzatto L. Complement-mediated haemolysis and the role of blood transfusion in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria. Blood Transfus. (2015) 13:363–9. doi: 10.2450/2015.0249-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Jäger U, Barcellini W, Broome CM, Gertz MA, Hill A, Hill QA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults: recommendations from the First International Consensus Meeting. Blood Rev. (2020) 41:100648. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100648

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Barcellini W. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Blood Transfus. (2015) 13:3–5. doi: 10.2450/2014.0252-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Go RS, Winters JL, Kay NE. How I treat autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Blood. (2017) 129:2971–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-11-693689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Brodsky RA. Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia. N Engl J Med. (2019) 381:647–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1900554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hill A, Hill QA. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. (2018) 2018:382–9. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Salama A, Göttsche B, Mueller-Eckhardt C. Autoantibodies and drug- or metabolite-dependent antibodies in patients with diclofenac-induced immune haemolysis. Br J Haematol. (1991) 77:546–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1991.tb08624.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Salama A, Kroll H, Wittmann G, Mueller-Eckhardt C. Diclofenac-induced immune haemolytic anaemia: simultaneous occurrence of red blood cell autoantibodies and drug-dependent antibodies. Br J Haematol. (1996) 95:640–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1947.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. de Quirós JF, Pinto V, Hevia S, Vigón R. Immune complex-mediated haemolytic anaemia and Evans syndrome induced by diclofenac. Vox Sang. (1997) 72:121–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.1997.7220121.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ahrens N, Genth R, Kiesewetter H, Salama A. Misdiagnosis in patients with diclofenac-induced hemolysis: new cases and a concise review. Am J Hematol. (2006) 81:128–31. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Somogyi A, Gugler R. Clinical pharmacokinetics of cimetidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. (1983) 8:463–95. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198308060-00001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Hill QA, Stamps R, Massey E, Grainger JD, Provan D, Hill A. British society for haematology guidelines [British society for haematology guidelines]. Guidelines on the management of drug-induced immune and secondary autoimmune, haemolytic anaemia. Br J Haematol. (2017) 177:208–20. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar