AUTHOR=Yuan Yan , Xiao Yi , Chen Xiang , Li Jie , Shen Minxue
TITLE=A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health Utility Estimates in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine
VOLUME=7
YEAR=2020
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2020.543290
DOI=10.3389/fmed.2020.543290
ISSN=2296-858X
ABSTRACT=Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common recurrent skin disease that adversely affect patient's quality of life condition to treat. Economic evaluations of health care often include patient preferences for health outcomes using utilities.
Objectives: The study aimed to determine pooled estimates of utility-based quality of life in patients with CSU.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of peer-reviewed articles and conference papers that published from database inception to 31 April 2019 that reported utility estimates in patients with CSU. Scores reported with the EQ-5D, SF-6D, SF-12, and SF-36 instruments were converted to utilities using published mapping algorithms. Meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled and meta-regression was used to examine the effects of possible factors.
Results: The pooled utility estimate for CSU was 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67–0.70]. The pooled utility estimate that converted from SF-36 or SF-12 was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58–0.74), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70–0.74) for EQ-5D, and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63–0.67) for SF-6D, respectively. According to the meta-regression, higher proportion of female patients was significantly associated lower utility estimates (p = 0.013).
Conclusions: The study provides evidence-based utility estimates to inform health-related burden analysis of CSU and reference for the follow-up cost-effectiveness evaluation of chronic spontaneous urticaria intervention. These results highlight differences in common utility-based instruments and need to be cognizant of the specific instruments used when comparing the results of outcome studies.