The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mech. Eng.
Sec. Tribology
Volume 11 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fmech.2025.1542074
Evaluation of Different Erosion Models for Predicting Guide Vane Wear in Francis Turbine
Provisionally accepted- 1 Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal
- 2 Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
Guide Vanes (GVs) are one of the most vulnerable components of the Francis turbine due to sediment erosion. High sediment concentration containing hard minerals including quartz and feldspar cause erosion on different parts of the Guide Vane such as the leading edge, trailing edge, clearance gap and facing plates. This results in damage and disturbances in the functioning of the turbine. CFD methods have been used to predict the erosion in turbines. The three-guide vane cascade rig setup allows for the investigation of fluid flow and pressure distribution with the angle of attack and pressure as control parameters. In this study, a RANS-based SST turbulence model has been used for a three-guide vane cascade rig. A Eulerian-Lagrangian approach has been used to facilitate multiphase flow. The erosion caused by the sediment-laden flow has been quantified and visualized by employing Finnie, Nandakumar, Oka, and Tabakoff and Grant erosion models. This study has been conducted to determine which of the erosion models predict the erosion pattern closer to the real case of eroded Guide Vane of Jhimruk Hydropower plant. Less severe erosion in the leading-edge area and severe erosion in the following edge of the suction side were predicted by Finnie model more precisely than the leading-edge suction side. Finnie erosion model could correctly predict at three different locations which are SS-TE, SS-LE and MS-LE. The severity and area affected due to erosion as predicted by Finnie erosion model was found to most closely match the erosion observed in guide vane clearance gap of real hydropower plant.
Keywords: Erosion models, Francis turbine guide vane, Clearance gap, OpenFOAM, leakage flow Font: Italic Font: 7 pt, Italic, Superscript Font: 7 pt, Italic Font: (Default) Times New Roman
Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shrestha, Shrestha, Chitrakar, Neopane, Thapa, Qian and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kushal Shrestha, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.