AUTHOR=Willert Emanuel TITLE=Influence of Wear Profile Geometry on Critical Plane Fatigue Crack Initiation Criteria in Plane and Axisymmetric Elastic Fretting Contacts JOURNAL=Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering VOLUME=8 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/mechanical-engineering/articles/10.3389/fmech.2022.904282 DOI=10.3389/fmech.2022.904282 ISSN=2297-3079 ABSTRACT=

The subsurface elastic stress fields in plane and axisymmetric contacts with friction under oscillating tangential loading are calculated via a very robust, high-precision method, which operates with appropriate superpositions of analytic solutions for the respective Hertzian contact problems. Based on the stress fields, two critical plane fatigue crack initiation criteria—the Smith-Watson-Topper (SWT) parameter and the Findley parameter—are evaluated for three types of contact profile geometries: (unworn) parabolic contact, the partial slip limiting wear profile of an initially parabolic contact, and truncated parabolic contact. Appropriate scaling laws are introduced to formulate a general solution in terms of non-dimensional variables. The crack initiation criteria are determined in the full subsurface loading plane. It is found that the truncated profile—which may originate from sliding wear—has practically the same local distribution of crack initiation criteria as the unworn profile, despite the (weak) stress singularity at the edge of the flat face. The partial slip limiting wear profile, on the other hand, exhibits a strong edge stress singularity at the boundary of the permanent stick zone, the crack initiation criteria are drastically increased (and theoretically infinite). Also, while for the unworn and truncated profiles high values of the crack initiation criteria are extremely localized around “hotspots” at the surface, for the partial slip limiting wear profile they reach much deeper into the subsurface material. This offers a new explanation for the dominance of fatigue failure in the partial slip regime of fretting. The differences between plane and axisymmetric cases are generally small. The SWT parameter is generally more localized than the Findley parameter.