- 1Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 2Laboratory for Metals, Corrosion and Anti-Corrosion Protection, Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 3Engineering Department, University Niccolò Cusano, Rome, Italy
- 4Centre for Materials and Processes, IMT Nord Europe, Institut Mines-Télécom, Univ. Lille, Douai, France
Editorial on the Research Topic
Women in science: materials 2023
According to the fact sheet on the gender gap in science published by UNESCO’s Institute for Statistics (UIS) in February 2024 (UIS - UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2024), women still account for a minority of the world’s researchers: overall, approximately one in three researchers are women. Taking into account all the data gathered by the UIS since 1996, representing 147 countries reporting on female researchers or research and development personnel in headcounts or full-time equivalents, the percentage of women researchers globally is 31.7% in 2021.
Despite the growing demand for cross-nationally comparable statistics on women in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), national data and their use in policymaking often remain limited. Over the past decade (2012–2021), 130 countries reported the share of women researchers in national science, technology and innovation systems. The shares of female researchers for 2021 by region are:
• 31.7% for World (↗ up from 30.9% in 2011).
• 49.6% for Central Asia (↗ up from 44.7% in 2011).
• 44.4% for Latin America and the Caribbean (≈ slightly lower than 44.9% in 2011).
• 41.1% for Arab States (↗ up from 37.7% in 2011).
• 38.7% for Central and Eastern Europe (↘ down from 40.5% in 2011).
• 33.9% in Western Europe (↗ up from 31.8% in 2011).
• 31.5% for Sub-Saharan Africa (↗ up from 29.1% in 2011).
• 26.8% for East Asia and the Pacific (↗ up from 21.1% in 2011).
• 25.9% in South and West Asia (≈ stable compared to 25.7% in 2011).
• No regional value for North America (Canada and the United States do not report internationally comparable data on share of female researchers).
These trends in regional and global averages, which should be considered as estimates, show that the evolution is slow, and that the scattering between regions remains high, the shares varying from single to double for example between the lowest (25.9%) and the highest (49.6%) observed values.
As role models are important to show to younger generations the growing impact of female researchers to science, and continuing the spirit of the International Day of Women and Girls in Science, Frontiers in Materials has decided to offer a platform to bring into the spotlight, highlight the impact, and promote the contributions and research outcomes of female scientists from different parts of the world working in materials science and engineering.
Following the first two editions (Bignozzi et al., 2021; Krawczak et al., 2023), this 3rd volume of the “Women in Science: Materials” article Research Topic (Figure 1) gathers a selection of original articles with the lead author and/or corresponding author being a woman.
Nine contributions (one perspective, one review and seven original research articles) present advances in theory, experiment, and methodology with applications to compelling problems, across different sections of the journal:
•Biomaterials and Bio-Inspired Materials: In a perspective paper, Danti and Berrettini have highlighted to what extent getting to nano can open new horizons for piezoelectric material-based cochlear implants. By combining nanostructured non-biodegradable biomaterials and an efficient surgical implantation based on tissue engineering approach, the envisioned piezoelectric device could be optimized in terms of reduced electric output and improved level of sensitivity. Foti et al. have proposed an innovative methodology for the effective removal of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), surfactant commonly used in the synthesis of gold nanorods (AuNR). The reported approach is based on a combination of ligand replacement and surface bioconjugation processes that efficiently removes CTAB and simultaneously functionalizes nanorods with hyaluronic acid (HA) to enhance their biocompatibility and introduce targeting capabilities toward cancer cells. Mellinas et al. have formulated and produced novel antioxidant/antifungal active films as promising alternatives to the traditional petrol-derived systems at the industrial scale. The developed films, produced by means of melt-blending followed by compression-moulding, are based on bio-polyethylene (BPE) added with Nutrabiol®T90 and Tocobiol®Plus natural extracts rich in tocopherols at different concentrations (1 and 3 wt%). The obtained films have been fully characterised in terms of barrier, mechanical, optical and functional properties.
•Environmental Degradation of Materials: Lors et al. have reviewed the progress made in the field of biodegradability of bio-based plastics based on polylactic acid (PLA). In particular, the main biodegradation mechanisms have been reviewed according to aerobic and anaerobic conditions, as well as the different microorganisms involved in the PLA degradation. Additionally, the analytical methods used to evaluate the PLA biodegradation have also been illustrated.
•Polymeric and Composite Materials: Yilmaz Attay and Bilgiç have developed new radar absorbing materials made of carbon nanotubes reinforced polymer composites to reduce the reflection of electromagnetic waves. In response to the issue of natural resource shortages in building and construction, Zambon and Deléglise-Lagardère have explored the potential for material valorization of shredded glass fiber/unsaturated polyester composites waste in mortar and concrete as a substitute to sand. Kayishaer et al. have investigated the electrodeposition of polyaniline films with an original focus on the modulation of the conductivity, capacitance and electroactivity of the films using surfactants of different polarity.
•Mechanics of Materials: Franzoni and Pizzigatti have investigated the performance of different repair mortars in terms of efficacy, compatibility and durability of an historic reinforced concrete floor slab in the context of 20th century architectural heritage conservation.
•Structural Materials: Hägg Mameng et al. have developed a practical tool consisting on building pitting engineering diagrams for stainless steel, considering several fundamental parameters, i.e. alloying composition of stainless steel, chloride ion, temperature, and the water system’s oxidation potential. This practical tool enables reliable stainless steel selection in presence of chloride-containing media at different temperatures and concentrations.
The Guest Editorial team hopes that this Research Topic has highlighted the diversity of research being performed by women researchers working in materials science and engineering. The Guest editorial team also hopes for inspiring future collaborations involving more female principal investigators.
Author contributions
GM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. TK: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. IC: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. PK: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Bignozzi, M. C., Johnson, J. A., Krawczak, P., Morallon, E., and Xu, M. (2021). Editorial: Women in science: materials. Front. Mater. 8, 668092. doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.668092
Krawczak, P., Baldino, L., Caballero, F. G., and Wang, Y. (2023). Editorial: Women in science: materials 2021. Front. Mater. 10, 1129648. doi:10.3389/fmats.2023.1129648
UIS - UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2024). The gender gap in science: status and trends, Fact sheet SC-PBS-STIP/2024/FWIS/2. Paris, France, 8. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388805.
Keywords: women in science and engineering, women in STEM, materials science, materials engineering, gender equality
Citation: Masi G, Kosec T, Cacciotti I and Krawczak P (2025) Editorial: Women in science: materials 2023. Front. Mater. 11:1549094. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2024.1549094
Received: 20 December 2024; Accepted: 24 December 2024;
Published: 17 January 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Chuangang Hu, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, ChinaCopyright © 2025 Masi, Kosec, Cacciotti and Krawczak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giulia Masi, Z2l1bGlhLm1hc2k1QHVuaWJvLml0; Tadeja Kosec, dGFkZWphLmtvc2VjQHphZy5zaQ==; Ilaria Cacciotti, aWxhcmlhLmNhY2Npb3R0aUB1bmljdXNhbm8uaXQ=; Patricia Krawczak, cGF0cmljaWEua3Jhd2N6YWtAaW10LW5vcmQtZXVyb3BlLmZy