Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mater.
Sec. Biomaterials and Bio-Inspired Materials
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmats.2024.1501505
This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Biomaterials and 3D Printing Technologies in Bone Repair, volume II View all articles

Hydrogel Composition and Mechanical Stiffness of 3D Bioprinted Cellloaded Scaffolds Promote Cartilage Regeneration

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China
  • 2 Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To investigate the impact of different component ratios and mechanical stiffness of the gelatin-sodium alginate composite hydrogel scaffold, fabricated through 3D bioprinting, on the viability and functionality of chondrocytes. Methods: Three different concentrations of hydrogel, designated as low, medium, and high, were prepared. The rheological properties of the hydrogel were characterized to optimize printing parameters. Subsequently, the printability and shape fidelity of the cell-loaded hydrogel scaffolds were statistically evaluated, and the chondrocyte viability was observed. Dynamic mechanical analysis was conducted to measure the modulus, thereby assessing the scaffold's stiffness. Following a 21-day culture period, RT-PCR, histological staining, and immunostaining were employed to assess chondrocyte activity, chondrosphere aggregates formation, and cartilage matrix production. Results: Based on rheological analysis, optimal printing temperatures for each group were determined as 27.8 ℃, 28.5 ℃, and 30 ℃. The optimized printing parameters could ensure the molding effect of the scaffolds on the day of printing, with the actual grid area of the scaffolds was close to the theoretical grid area. And the scaffolds exhibited good cell viability (93.24±0.99%, 92.04±1.49%, and 88.46±1.53%). After 7 days of culture, the medium and high concentration groups showed no significant change in grid area compared to the day of printing (P>0.05), indicating good morphological fidelity. As the hydrogel's bicomponent ratio increased, both the storage modulus and loss modulus increased, while the loss factor remained relatively constant. The highest number of chondrocytes-formed chondrosphere aggregates in the medium concentration group was observed by light microscopy. RT-PCR results indicated significantly higher expression levels of chondrogenic genes SOX9, Agg, and Col-II in the low and medium concentration groups compared to the high concentration group (P<0.05). Histological staining results showed that the middle concentration group formed the highest number of typical cartilage lacunae. Conclusion: The aforementioned results indicate that in 3D bioprinted cell-loaded GA-SA composite hydrogel scaffolds, the scaffolds with the composition ratio (10:3) and mechanical stiffness (~155kPa) exhibit sustained morphological fidelity, effectively preserve the hyaline phenotype of chondrocytes, and are more conducive to cartilage regeneration.

    Keywords: Gelatin, Sodium alginate, Hydrogel, chondrocyte, Bioprinting, Mechanical stiffness

    Received: 25 Sep 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Liu, Wei, Li, Zhai, Zhang, Jin, Guan and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Dewei Zhao, School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, 116028, Liaoning Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.