Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mater.
Sec. Structural Materials
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmats.2024.1450824
This article is part of the Research Topic Supplementary Cementitious Materials: Recent Developments, Performance Insights and Potential Applicability View all 5 articles

Waste Ceramic Powder for Sustainable Concrete Production as Supplementary Cementitious Material

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Konya, Türkiye
  • 2 University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
  • 3 Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Türkiye
  • 4 Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Türkiye
  • 5 Tomarza Mustafa Akincioglu Vocational School, Department of Construction, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Türkiye
  • 6 Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Mugla, Türkiye
  • 7 Department of Civil Engineering, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    A detailed examination was carried out by substituting waste ceramic powder (WCP) at certain ratios in the cement mortar. To achieve this, five different WCP percentages (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) were used in the manufacturing of concrete. First, the workability and slump values in the fresh state of concrete were determined by performing a slump test. Subsequently, to assess the effectiveness of concrete fabricated using WCP, several tests, including compressive strength (CS), splitting tensile strength (STS), and flexural strength (FS), tests were conducted on the specimens. In light of the various numbers of waste materials utilized, variations in strength capacity were determined. The findings demonstrated that by including WCP at concentrations of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%, there was a corresponding reduction in CS of 5.8%, 21.8%, 47.1%, 63.2%, and 73.6%, respectively. The decreases in STS were 6.3%, 13.8%, 35.2%, 49.7%, and 65.4%, respectively, when a plain concrete STS value of 1.59 MPa was considered.Similarly, when the WCP content increased, FS was reduced by 15.3%, 21.4%, 31.6%, 44.9%, and 54.1%, respectively. This is very significant because it represents one of the key issues in calculating the optimal quantity of WCP in relation to both the strength and the amount of waste materials used. Furthermore, taking into account our experimental research and previous studies on concrete produced using WCP, straightforward equations were provided for practical use to predict CS, STS, and FS. On the other hand, scanning electron microscopy was conducted on validate the findings obtained from the experimental part of the study. The results also showed that WCP provided good cement adhesion. The artificial neural network modeling technique was adopted to estimate the concrete properties with coefficients of determination of 0.944 (CS), 0.900 (STS), and 0.856 (FS) with K-fold cross-validation.

    Keywords: Waste ceramic powder, Cement mortar, strength, Artificial Neural network modeling, Supplementary cementitious material

    Received: 18 Jun 2024; Accepted: 20 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Özkılıç, Bahrami, Güzel, Soğancı, Karalar, Althaqafi, ÇELİK, Zeybek and P. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Alireza Bahrami, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.