Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Mater., 24 May 2022
Sec. Colloidal Materials and Interfaces
This article is part of the Research Topic Particle Interfaces & Interface Performance Materials View all 7 articles

Editorial: Particle Interfaces & Interface Performance Materials

  • 1National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, China
  • 2Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
  • 3Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

With the development of colloid and interface science, nanoscience and particuology, the studies on particle systems have shifted from the single and simple system to multiphase, multicomponent and multi-scale complex system, and those on the particle surface and interface have changed from overall interface effect to the local microstructure of interface. Following the fast-paced development in synthesis and measurement technology, interface performance materials (IPMs) family is also expanding from solid-phase materials to liquid-phase materials, e.g., emulsion, gas-phase materials, e.g., bubbles and multiphase mixed systems, where the internal structure of the IPMs is changed from rigid structure such as metal organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs) and other molecular sieves, to flexible structure such as micelles, vesicles, macromolecules and supramolecular assemblies, multiple and composite structure. This interdisciplinary area involves the physical, chemical and biological interfaces of materials, where the relevant researches have obvious academic significance and great application value for the synthesis, dispersion, stability, surface modification of the materials, and catalysis, drug production, drug delivery, and its biological effects, especially micro- and nanoscale materials. The Research Topic includes volume 1 and 2, where volume 1 has completed last year and volume 2 is opened to call manuscripts now. The editorial comments have summarized the 6 papers published in volume 1 as below.

In terms of IPMs, Lei et al. modeled the binary active/passive colloids systems self-organizing into schools of active colloids with exclusion zone, active crystal core surrounded by passive colloids, yolk/shell structure, dynamical clusters, and motile clusters while exclusion zone is formed when the passive colloids strongly repulse the active colloids. In addition, their study shows that active colloids and passive colloids will separate into two phases when the attraction difference is large enough resulting in the yolk/shell structure and the binary mixture may collapse to a stable mixture when the attractive interaction strength is of comparable magnitude.

Another work from Shuai et al. reported the synthesis of IPMs, where a large number of ions with unsaturated coordination number are generated on the surfaces of brucite and ZnO particles under mechanical grinding, which activates and promotes the hydroxylation and the formation of the associated hydroxyl groups on the particle surfaces by adding NaOH. ZnO/brucite composites prepared by mechanochemical methods result in the dehydration and condensation of the surface hydroxyl groups between the ZnO and brucite particles and the formation of Zn-O-Mg bonds connected by weak hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces.

To study the particle interface, the gas nanobubbles is becoming very popular nowadays due to their excellent performance in environmental, agricultural and medical fields such as water remediation (Gurung et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2018), surface cleaning (Wu et al., 2008; Liu, 2009), plant and animal breeding (Ebina et al., 2013), mineral flotation (Sobhy, 2013; Etchepare et al., 2017), medical diagnosis (Yang et al., 2013; Duan et al., 2015) and targeted delivery of genes and drugs (Liu et al., 2017), etc. It is found that there are two states of gas aggregation at nanometer scale. One is bubble-like domains (nanobubbles) and another is gas layers (also called micropancakes) (Zhang et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009). The existence of nanobubbles has already been confirmed but the mechanism of their extraordinary stability remains unclear since the publication of first nanobubble images in 2000 (Ishida et al., 2000; Lou et al., 2000). This Research Topic intends to collect the latest advances in explanation on the stability of surface and bulk nanobubbles and provide the latest perspectives in terms of theoretical explanations by considering some important factors such as surface tension, surface chemical heterogeneity and gas saturation, etc (Fang et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2020). Pan et al. investigated the influence of the variable surface tensions on the stability of surface nanobubbles. They found that the decrease in surface tension can lead to larger contact angle and even make the nanobubbles survivable on the highly hydrophilic surface. The contact angle is also getting larger in the state-dependence, and the increase of the gas saturation degree is beneficial to the stability of surface nanobubbles. Yang et al. studied the influence of surface chemical heterogeneity on the morphology of surface nanobubbles by molecular dynamics simulations. They gave the idea that the gaseous domains could not nucleate on the hydrophilic substrate, while only dense gas layer (DGL) could be observed from the time-averaged density map for homogeneously hydrophobic substrate due to the random moving of surface nanobubbles. Generally, the dynamic process of gas in water involves the dissolution, diffusion, release, and transportation of gas as well as the properties of nanobubbles inside. Wang et al. analyzed theoretically the lifetime of single bulk nanobubbles in an open system by introducing the gas transport parameter in the classical diffusion equation by considering the gas diffusion and the MacLeod-Sugden relationship between the surface tension and densities of liquid and gas. The results showed that the single nanobubble lifetime depends on the inner density and gas transport length, which can reach 101–102 s for a single nanobubble with an initial radius of 200 nm.

The adsorption and recovery of CO2 has become an important technique to address the increasing environmental challenges. The use of porous materials, especially MOFs has attracted great attention. Although MOFs possess promising properties including high surface area, high porosity and tunable structure, a considerable amount of MOFs are still facing stability challenges, especially moisture stability which significantly affects the practical applications. Watanabe et al. explored the structural change of ELM-11, a commercially available MOFs, in the presence of water and the consequent effects on CO2 adsorption. The authors found that a subface, which is an isomer of ELM-11 was formed upon water exposure. This finally led to irreversible amorphous phases generated at the subface boundary, resulting in a lower CO2 adsorption capacity. Coating a water stable MOF shell, ELM-12, on ELM-11 could effectively slow the supply rate of moisture, thus suppressed the subface and amorphous phase formation, and consequently improved the CO2 adsorption capacity upon water exposure.

In summary, this Research Topic has selected and collected 6 original research papers on gas-liquid interface (nanobubbles), synthesis of IPMs and their adsorption to CO2 and passive particles, and introduced the recent development on these areas. However, we will continue to attract more high quality works on these areas to be published on volume 2.

Author Contributions

LZ edited the section about nanobubbles and TT done some paragraphs on MOFs stuff while LC organized the whole manuscript and edited the nanomaterials section.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Duan, L., Yang, F., Song, L., Fang, K., Tian, J., Liang, Y., et al. (2015). Controlled Assembly of Magnetic Nanoparticles on Microbubbles for Multimodal Imaging. Soft Matter 11 (27), 5492–5500. doi:10.1039/c5sm00864f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebina, K., Shi, K., Hirao, M., Hashimoto, J., Kawato, Y., Kaneshiro, S., et al. (2013). Oxygen and Air Nanobubble Water Solution Promote the Growth of Plants, Fishes, and Mice. PLoS One 8 (6), e65339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Etchepare, R., Azevedo, A., Calgaroto, S., and Rubio, J. (2017). Removal of Ferric Hydroxide by Flotation with Micro and Nanobubbles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 184, 347–353. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.05.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, Z., Wang, L., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Wang, S., Zou, Z., et al. (2018). Formation and Stability of Surface/Bulk Nanobubbles Produced by Decompression at Lower Gas Concentration. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 22418–22423. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05688

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gurung, A., Dahl, O., and Jansson, K. (2016). The Fundamental Phenomena of Nanobubbles and Their Behavior in Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Geosystem Eng. 19, 1–10. doi:10.1080/12269328.2016.1153987

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishida, N., Inoue, T., Miyahara, M., and Higashitani, K. (2000). Nano Bubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface in Water Observed by Tapping-Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir 16, 6377–6380. doi:10.1021/la000219r

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, G. (2009). Improved Cleaning of Hydrophilic Protein-Coated Surfaces Using the Combination of Nanobubbles and SDS. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1, 481–487. doi:10.1021/am800150p

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Li, M., Yang, F., and Gu, N. (2017). Magnetic Drug Delivery Systems. Sci. China Mater. 60 (6), 471–486. doi:10.1007/s40843-017-9049-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lou, S.-T., Ouyang, Z.-Q., Zhang, Y., Li, X.-J., Hu, J., Li, M.-Q., et al. (2000). Nanobubbles on Solid Surface Imaged by Atomic Force Microscopy [J]. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. 18 (5), 2573–2575. doi:10.1116/1.1289925

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sobhy, A. T. D. (2013). Nanobubble Column Flotation of Fine Coal Particles and Associated Fundamentals. Int. J. Min. Process 124, 109–116. doi:10.1016/j.minpro.2013.04.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Z., Chen, H., Dong, Y., Mao, H., Sun, J., Chen, S., et al. (2008). Cleaning Using Nanobubbles: Defouling by Electrochemical Generation of Bubbles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 328, 10–14. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2008.08.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, W., Ke, N., Zhou, L., Wang, J., Zhang, L., Dong, Y., et al. (2018). The Role of Nanobubbles in the Precipitation and Recovery of Organic-Phosphine-Containing Beneficiation Wastewater. Langmuir 34, 6217–6224. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, F., Wang, Q., Gu, Z., Fang, K., Marriott, G., and Gu, N. (2013). Silver Nanoparticle-Embedded Microbubble as a Dual-Mode Ultrasound and Optical Imaging Probe. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 5 (18), 9217–9223. doi:10.1021/am4029747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Fan, C., Zhang, Y., and Hu, J. (2009). Nanoscale Multiple Gaseous Layers on a Hydrophobic Surface [J]. Langmuir 25 (16), 8860–8864. doi:10.1021/la901620e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X. H., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Z., Li, G., Fang, H., et al. (2007). Detection of Novel Gaseous States at the Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite− Water Interface [J]. Langmuir 23 (4), 1778–1783. doi:10.1021/la062278w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, L., Wang, X., Shin, H. J., Wang, J., Tai, R., Zhang, X., et al. (2020). Ultrahigh Density of Gas Molecules Confined in Surface Nanobubbles in Ambient Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (12), 5583–5593. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b11303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: particle, interface, Nanobubble, MOFs, nanomaterial

Citation: Chen L, Zhang L and Tian T (2022) Editorial: Particle Interfaces & Interface Performance Materials. Front. Mater. 9:931773. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2022.931773

Received: 29 April 2022; Accepted: 09 May 2022;
Published: 24 May 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Jie-Sheng Chen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Copyright © 2022 Chen, Zhang and Tian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lan Chen, chenlan@nanoctr.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.