Haibin Liu
Feng Zhuang1†- 1Department of General Surgery, Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumchi, China
- 2Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- 3Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
Organic–inorganic nanocomposites for photothermal therapy of cancers emerged as a promising strategy against malignant tumors. However, it is still a big challenge to develop a nanocomposite system that can maximize the synergistic photo-thermal therapy effect as well as preserve high stability for simultaneous delivery of the chemotherapeutic drugs and photo-thermal agents. Here, we have exploited an organic liposome containing inorganic core for co-loading the aggregates of bovine serum albumin (BSA), indocyanine green (ICG), and doxorubicin (DOX), abbreviated as BID-liposomal nanocomposites. The three kinds of substances were aggregated in the core of liposomal nanocomposites through hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. In vitro characterization shows that BID-liposomal nanocomposites were spherical nanoparticles with size of 30–50 nm and good storage stability. Moreover, BID-Liposomal nanocomposites illustrate the strongest cytotoxicity among all the formulations against murine 4T1 tumor cells. In breast cancer-bearing mouse models, BID liposomes lead to significant improvements in tumor inhibition effects with no obvious toxicity. Therefore, the BID-liposomal nanoparticle is believed to be a promising strategy for chemo-photo-thermal therapy against cancers.
Introduction
As one of the standard-of-care cancer treatments, chemotherapy has been in a dilemma due to lack of tissue targeting and dose-limiting toxicities (Fan et al., 2017). With the rapid development of nanomedicine, scientists have developed many new therapeutic strategies against cancer, for example, photodynamic therapy (PDT), radiotherapy, gene therapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy (PTT) Min et al. (2017), Li et al. (2018a), Kedmi et al. (2018), Liu et al. (2019a), Chen et al. (2019), and cancer gas therapy (Opoku-Damoah et al., 2021). However, a monotherapy is not sufficient for effective cancer therapy. A great number of combination therapies has been reported, especially the combination of chemotherapy and photothermal therapy, as a promising strategy. Liu et al. (2021) developed a multifunctional nanoplatform which can realize pH-sensitive drug release in an acidic tumor environment and the efficient photo-thermal conversion of ICG/Cu-LDH, causing synergism to significantly improve the therapeutic effect of anticancer.
For photothermal therapy (PTT), the laser with a near-infrared (NIR) light was applied to irradiate the photothermal agents (PTAs), such as ICG and Prussian blue, to achieve strong penetration into human tissues (Hu et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Pan et al., 2018a; Pan et al., 2018b; Shan et al., 2018; Xue et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019b; Chen et al., 2020a; Chen et al., 2020b). Most of the above agents are actively or passively carried and stored around the tumor through various targeted technologies. These photosensitizers could generate heat under NIR light. When the local temperature reaches above 40°C, tumor cells will be inhibited or killed at high temperatures (Yang et al., 2017). In a wide range of photothermal agents, ICG is an FDA-approved reagent for in vivo imaging because of its good biocompatibility and NIR fluorescent characteristics. Besides the application in disease imaging, ICG is also widely applied in the area of photothermal therapy due to its strong absorption ability and a good photothermal conversion ability. However, it is limited by the defect of easy diffusion in vivo and repeated-irradiation causing photothermal conversion instability (Shan et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019b).
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a classic and effective chemotherapy drug with a wide antitumor spectrum, which is often used in the treatment of malignant lymphoma, acute leukemia, breast cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, and other different types of cancer (Huang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018b; Hao et al., 2018; Ni et al., 2018; Song et al., 2019). DOX has an excellent therapeutic effect and extensive application, but also has many untoward effects, such as severe side effects on the heart (Li et al., 2018b). For alleviation of toxicity, a version of the chemotherapy medication doxorubicin, Doxil, has been developed by a liposome-based strategy (Lyon et al., 2018; Penson et al., 2020). Liposomal nanocomposites are nanoscale particles nanoparticle delivery systems with enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) have unique advantages in cancer treatment. As a result, Doxil has a longer half-life in the blood circulation, leading to more time taken to reach the time tissue and penetrate the tumor tissue more easily and stay in the tumor tissue longer. Doxil has become a classic example for the delivery of chemo-drugs (He et al., 2019).
Here, we proposed to develop efficient chemo-photo-thermal composite systems of liposomal nanocomposites co-loading three components of ICG, DOX, and BSA. The ICG/DOX electrostatic interactions and stong binding capacity of ICG with BSA enable the aggregate formation of the above three substances. The aggregates is crucial for the photothermal effect of ICG molecules, sustain release of both ICG and DOX, and the stability of the whole systems. In this study, BID-liposomal nanocomposites were firstly prepared and characterized in vitro. Then, the cytoxicity and in vivo antitumor activity were investigated in various breast cancer cells and tumor-bearing mouse models.
Materials and Methods
Materials
CaCl2, Na2HPO4, cyclohexane, doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX) were purchased from Aladdin Company; bovine serum albumin (BSA), indocyanine green (ICG), and IGEPAL® CO-520 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.; phospholipids (DOTAP, DOPA, and DSPE-PEG2000) were ordered from Avanti Polar Lipid, Inc. Other reagents were analytically pure. All reagents are applied directly without further purification. Deionised water was used in experiments.
4T1 cells (mouse breast cancer cells) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Female NOD/SCID mice with 6–8 weeks of age were used for development of cancer-bearing mouse models. All work on animals was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital.
Preparation of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
Based on previous research Li et al. (2012), Luo et al. (2016), the BID-liposomal nanocomposites were prepared by two steps including an inverse microemulsion method and a film dispersion method. First, 0.3 ml of 500 mM CaCl2 solution and 6 mg BSA/ICG (W/W = 5/1) aggregates were dispersed into 15 ml cyclohexane/IGEPAL® CO-520 mixed solution under the condition of sonication to form a water-in-oil reverse microemulsion. At the same time, a similar microemulsion containing 0.3 ml of 25 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mg DOX, and 0.2 ml DOPA (20 mg/ml) was also prepared. Then, the two microemulsions above were mixed together to obtain calcium phosphate granules. After demulsification and centrifugation thrice, the calcium phosphate granules as a core were collected in chloroform for further use. Second, the lipid film was prepared using 1 ml of calcium phosphate core, 0.1 ml of DOTAP/cholesterol (1:1, 10 mM), and 0.1 ml of DSPE-PEG2000 (3 mM). All the materials were mixed in chloroform and subjected to rotatory evaporation to remove organic solvents. Finally, 1 ml Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) was added into the bottle with a lipid film. Under the condition of ultrasonic dispersion, BID-liposomal nanocomposites were obtained and further purified by dialysis (M.W. 3,500 KD) in water for 24 h. The purified BID-liposomal nanocomposites were stored in dark place at 4°C.
In vitro Characterization of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL174 1200EX) was used to observe and photograph the morphology and size of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. For the preparation of TEM samples, BID-liposomal nanocomposites or the inorganic components of the core were dropped onto copper grids followed by negative staining with 1% uranium acetate, respectively. The hydrodynamic diameters of BID-liposomal nanocomposites were assayed by a dynamic light scattering method (PSS ZPW388-NICOMP Particle Sizing System) at room temperature. The particle sizes of BID-Liposomal nanocomposites and ICG-Liposomal nanocomposites during storage at 4°C were recorded to evaluate the formulation stability.
In order to study the stability of BID-liposomal nanocomposites in vivo, BID-liposomal nanocomposites were added to the medium containing 10% FBS to simulate the intracorporeal environment. The concentration of BID-liposomal nanocomposites was 160 μg/ml (calculated by ICG concentration). The samples were incubated in a cell incubator at 37°C for 3 days and compared with the BID-liposomal nanocomposites stored at 4°C, and the particle size difference at different time points was compared.
In vitro Fluorescence and UV-Vis Spectrum Assay of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
To study the fluorescent properties, we scanned the fluorescence spectrum of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. Before scanning, the samples were diluted 30 folds by Tris-HCl buffer or methanol. For the investigation of DOX fluorescence in liposomal nanocomposites, the excitation wavelength was set as 480 nm. The emission wavelength ranged from 500 to 900 nm. For the investigation of ICG fluorescence in liposomal nanocomposites, the excitation wavelength was set as 780 nm. The emission wavelength ranged from 790 to 900 nm.
To calculate the encapsulation efficiency of DOX and ICG in BID-liposomal nanocomposites, the drug concentrations were assayed by ultraviolet and visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometry. The standard curve of DOX and ICG is plotted for quantitative determination of drug concentrations in BID-liposomes, which were destroyed with 10-fold methanol before detection. The UV scanning wavelength ranges of DOX and ICG were set from 300 to 900 nm, respectively.
In vitro the Photo-Thermal Transformation Characteristics Assay
In order to evaluate the photothermal properties of BID-liposomal nanocomposites in 96-well plates, different concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 μg/ml, calculated with ICG concentration) of BID-liposomal nanocomposites (0.2 ml) were exposed to 808 nm laser at 1 W/cm2 concentration. Sample temperatures at different time points were recorded by thermal infrared imaging system (FOTRIC).
To further investigate the photothermal conversion stability of BID-liposomal nanocomposites, the sample with 160 mg/ml BID-liposomal nanocomposites (calculated with ICG concentration) was exposed to five cycles of NIR radiation. After 3 min of each irradiation (1 W/cm2, 808 nm), the sample was cooled to room temperature and then re-exposed to the laser. Monitor the sample temperature change and draw the temperature change curve after five cycles.
In vitro Cytotoxicity Assays
To assess the cytotoxicity of the BID-liposomal nanocomposites, the viability of the cultured cells was measured according to the standard protocol of a methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) method. (Anishiya et al., 2020). 4T1 tumor cells (5,000 cells each well) were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured under the condition of 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h, free DOX and DOX-liposomal nanocomposites with different DOX concentrations were added into each well. After 24-h incubation, the cell culture solutions were discarded followed by PBS rinse thrice. 20 μl MTT solution (5 mg/ml, 0.5% MTT) was added to each well and subsequently incubated for 4 h. Then, 150 μl dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well on a shaker at the speed of 20 rpm for 10 min. The cytotoxicity of DOX formulations was further assayed by enzyme-linked immunoassay to measure the absorption value at 490 nm wavelength.
Similarly, 4T1 tumor cells (5,000 cells each well) were incubated in 96-well plates for 24 h followed by treatment with different concentrations of ICG formulations (1, 5, 10 μg/ml). Then, each well was exposed to 808 nm laser (1 W/cm2) for 1 min. The wells without NIR treatment were used as control. After 48-h incubation, the optical density (OD) values were determined for the evaluation of cytotoxicity.
In vivo Pharmacodynamic Experiments
Female NOD/SCID mice (6–8 weeks old) were subcutaneously inoculated with 4T1 cells (1*106) in the left armpit, respectively. When the solid tumor size reached approximately 100–150 mm3, the tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into six groups and received the following treatment schemes: 1) PBS; 2) DOX (2 mg/kg DOX); 3) DOX-liposomes (2 mg/kg DOX); 4) ICG (2 mg/kg ICG), plus irradiation; 5) ICG-Liposomes (2 mg/kg ICG), plus irradiation; and 6) BID-Liposomes (the dose was calculated by DOX with 2 mg/kg), plus irradiation. Irradiation was performed at 24 h post administration. The first day of administration was recorded as day 0, and the dose was repeated every other day for an overall 8 times during the treatment period. The body weight of each mouse was recorded till the experimental end. At day 14, all the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Tumors were excised and weighed.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data were indicated as means ± standard deviation (SD). Either a Student’s t-test or a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess the experimental results. A p-value of less than 0.05 was regarded to have a statistically significant difference.
Results and Discussions
Development of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
Due to a high water solubility of free ICG and DOX (in hydrochloride form), injection of each drug alone would cause diffusion in the whole body, probably limiting the chemo-photo-thermal combination effect on cancer therapy (Iimuro, 2017; Bönisch et al., 2019). Although ICG and DOX could be formed into aggregates through electrostatic attraction, these aggregates are unstable, especially in a complex environment in vivo (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1. The schematic diagram of BSA/ICG/DOX formation in deionized water. The ICG/DOX electrostatic interactions and strong binding capacity of ICG with BSA enable the aggregate formation of the above three substances. These aggregates are probably unstable in a complex environment.
Here, to make full use of the interactions of various molecules, the BSA/ICG/DOX aggregates were turned into the core of the BID-liposomal nanoparticle (Figure 2). Besides the core, this liposomal nanoparticle contains outer leaflet of lipid bi-layers. All the components are crucial for the performance of BID-liposomal nanocomposites in vitro and in vivo. First, the BSA/ICG/DOX aggregates would be beneficial to exert a higher photothermal effect than free ICG. Second, the lipid coating with DSPE-PEG would be helpful for stable storage of BID-liposomal nanoparticle and long circulation after being injected. Third, these BID-liposomal nanocomposites could achieve controllable drug release in the acidic environment of tumor. Finally, under the condition of laser irradiation, the combination of DOX and ICG that co-delivered into the tumor site would significantly enhance the antitumor effect compared to either chemotherapy or photothermal alone.
FIGURE 2. The outline for the preparation of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. The liposomal nanocomposites were prepared by combination of a water-in-oil microemulsion method and a film-dispersion method. BSA/ICG/DOX aggregates were concentrated in the core of liposomal nanocomposites for improvement of stability and synergistic chemo-photo-thermal antitumor effect.
It is noted that there are three kinds of nanostructures during the process of formulation: inorganic core without any lipid, inorganic core with a single layer of lipid (DOPA), and inorganic core with bilayer of lipid (named BID-liposomes in this study). The particle size of inorganic core without any lipid was extremely uncontrollable during the process of formulation. The inorganic core with a single layer of lipid has a uniform particle size but hydrophobic surfaces, difficult to be dissolved in water.
In vitro Characterization of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
To characterize the morphology and particle size of BID-liposomal nanocomposites, we observed the liposomal nanocomposites under the transmission electron microscope (TEM) using a method of negative staining. TEM images show spherical solid cores with transparent shells, which is indicated as lipid bilayers (Figure 3A). As a control, inorganic core with a single layer of lipid was dissolved in the dichloromethane and imaged by TEM. The inorganic components of the core were the nano-sized calcium phosphate precipitates with a diameter of 20–30 nm, which were generated by the reaction between CaCl2 and NaHPO4. The loose and porous structure of core can encapsulate the BSA/ICG/DOX aggregates. Due to these hydrophilic coatings, BID-liposomal nanocomposites could effectively avoid the uptake of reticuloendothelial system (RES) and thus achieve long circulation in blood. Moreover, the particle size of BID-Liposomal nanocomposites was determined by a dynamic light scattering (DLS) method (Figure 3B), in which the BID-liposomal nanocomposites were about 40 nm, consistent with that in TEM images. Figure 3C showed that the changes in the zeta potential of the nanocomposites over the incubation time. The zeta potential could maintain relatively stable for at least 2 weeks.
FIGURE 3. In vitro characterization of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. (A) TEM images of BID-liposomal nanocomposites and the inorganic components of the core. Scale bar: 200 and 50 nm. (B) Particle size assay of BID liposomal nanocomposites. (C) Changes in zeta potential of BID-liposomal nanocomposites over the incubation time. (D) Changes in the particle size of BID-liposomal nanocomposites treated or untreated with a medium containing 10% serum at 37°C within 3 days (E) Storage stablity of BID-liposomal nanocomposites and ICG-Liposomal nanocomposites at 4°C.
The stability of BID-liposomal nanocomposites in vivo is an important prerequisite for their function. BID-liposomal nanocomposites incubated in a medium containing 10% FBS for 3 days at 37°C were compared with the original sample. Figure 3D showed a slight increase in particle size of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. The adsorption of FBS on the periphery of BID-liposomal nanocomposites may lead to the increase of particle size.
To further study the storage stability of BID-liposomal nanocomposites which is one of the key parameters of nanoparticles, we determined the particle sizes at each preset time point and plotted the change of size as a function of time. Results showed that both BID-liposomal nanocomposites and ICG-liposomal nanocomposites could maintain the same particle size (Figure 3E). This excellent stability is attributable to the small size of BID-liposomal nanocomposites and the protection of lipid bilayers.
In vitro Fluorescence and UV–Vis Spectrum of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
To characterize the fluorescent properties, we scanned the fluorescence spectra of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. For excitation of DOX in liposomal nanocomposites, a peak of emission wavelength at 590 nm was observed in either treated or untreated with methanol dilution of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. (Figure 4A). For excitation of ICG in liposomal nanocomposites, both treated and untreated with methanol dilution of BID-liposomal nanocomposites illustrated obvious emission wavelength peak at 815 nm (Figure 4B).
FIGURE 4. In vitro fluorescence and UV–vis spectrum assay of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. (A)The emission spectra (500–900 nm) of BID-liposomes diluted with 30-fold methanol or water under the excitation wavelength of 480 nm. (B) The emission spectra (790–900 nm) of BID-liposomes diluted with 30-fold methanol or water under the excitation wavelength of 780 nm. (C) The UV–vis spectrum (300–900 nm) of BID liposomes. (D) Standard curve of DOX by the absorbance assay. (E) Standard curve of ICG by the absorbance assay.
The UV–vis absorbance spectra validated the successful encapsulation of ICG and DOX in BID-liposomal nanocomposites (Figure 4C). Based on the UV–vis spectra, the encapsulation efficiency of ICG and DOX in nanocomposites were 81.98 ± 0.86% and 54.24 ± 2.12%, respectively, calculated by the standard curves of free ICG and DOX. All the above data suggest successful encapsulation of ICG and DOX in BID-liposomal nanocomposites due to the strong interaction among BSA, ICG, and DOX.
In vitro Photo-Thermal Effect of BID-Liposomal Nanocomposites
To assess the photo-thermal potency, the changes of temperature were monitored by using a thermal infrared imaging agent while the BID-liposomal nanocomposites were irradiated by a laser (808 nm, 1 W/cm2) in vitro. Five different concentrations of BID-liposomal nanocomposites (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 μg/ml, calculated with ICG concentration) were used to research the temperature changes under NIR irradiation. After one minute irradiation, the temperature of each concentration of BID-liposomal nanocomposites increases sharply. As expected, there was a positive correlation between temperature and BID-liposomal nanocomposites concentration (Figure 5A). The 10 μg/ml nanoparticles could maintain the temperature above 40°C (Figure 5B), which can produce a mild thermal effect, promoting the uptake of chemotherapeutic drugs by cells. Deionised water as blank control had no effect on NIR irradiation. The above data proved that nanoparticles have a good photothermal effect. The results showed that under NIR irradiation, BID-liposomal nanocomposites transform light into a high temperature that tumor cells cannot bear, thus inhibiting the growth of tumor cells or directly killing tumor cells.
FIGURE 5. The photothermal effect of the BID-liposomal nanocomposites. The thermographs (A) and corresponding heating curves (B) of the BID-liposomal nanocomposites at varied concentrations upon 808 nm laser exposure (1 W/cm2) in 96-well plates. BID-liposomal nanocomposites with different concentrations of ICG were assessed. (C) Heating curves of BID-liposomal nanocomposites subjected to repeated irradiation at 808 nm (1 W/cm2).
ICG is the main component of photothermal effect in BID-liposomal nanocomposites. Although it has superior photo-thermal conversion performance, but there are still some problems, such as photobleaching and reduction of photothermal effects after repeated exposure to radiation. As shown in Figure 5C, BID-liposomal nanocomposites undergo repeated NIR irradiation. In the first three cycles, the photothermal effect of BID-liposomal nanocomposites kept good repeatability, but in the fourth cycle, the photothermal effect of BID-liposomal nanocomposites decreased. This means that the photothermal effect of the BID-liposomal nanocomposites will gradually decrease with the increase of radiation times, which is consistent with the results of previous studies (Shan et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019b). However, BID-liposomal nanocomposites showed relatively stable photothermal production in the first three cycles, indicating their potential as photothermal therapy.
In vitro Cytotoxicity Assays
The cytotoxicity of BID-liposomal nanocomposites was evaluated in 4T1 cancer cells using an MTT assay. Prior to the determination of BID-liposomal nanocomposites-causing cytoxicity, the cell viability after treatment with free DOX and DOX-liposomal nanocomposites were assessed. In Figure 6A, both DOX and DOX-liposomal nanocomposites showed negligible toxicity against cells. When the concentration of DOX was up to 3 μg/ml, obvious cell death in the cell culture well was observed under the microscopy. Overall, the BID-liposomal nanocomposites and free DOX illustrate comparable cytotoxicities, suggesting that liposomal materials were nontoxic. Theoretically, DOX concentration of DOX-liposomal nanocomposites could be enhanced by liposomal nanoparticle-mediated cellular uptake but toxicity reduced by the sustained release of DOX from liposomal nanocomposites. Both of these factors eventually resulted in a similar drug concentration in cells and cytotoxicity of DOX-liposomal nanocomposites compared with free DOX.
FIGURE 6. Cytotoxicity assay against 4T1 breast cancer cells. (A) Survival percentage of 4T1 cells under the treatment of various concentrations of free DOX and DOX liposomal nanocomposites. (B) Survival percentage of 4T1 cells under various treatments of chemicals or combined chemo-photo-thermal treatments (mean ± SD; **p < 0.01; ns, not significant; n = 3).
As expected, free ICG without irradiation did not affect the survival of 4T1 cells. After irradiation, the BID-liposomal nanocomposites showed the strongest cytotoxicity among all the formulations (6.7 ± 3.4% for BID-Liposomal nanocomposites, 42.1 ± 5.8% for ICG-liposomal nanocomposites and 60.9 ± 2.9% for free ICG, Figure 6B). This suggests that the ICG in aggregate form is beneficial to enhance the photo-thermal effect compared with free ICG. More importantly, ICG and DOX displayed a significant combination therapeutic effect against cancer cells (Zheng et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2019c). All these data suggest the necessity of encapsulating the ICG/DOX aggregates into the core of BID-liposomal nanocomposites.
Besides the direct tumor cell killing effect by photothermal therapy, more action mechanisms should be involved. According to previous reports, laser irradiation on ICG could induce ROS production and apoptosis of cancer cells, thus greatly enhanced the antitumor efficacy (Liu et al., 2021; Opoku-Damoah et al., 2021). The mechanisms of BID-liposomes will be further investigated in our future work.
In vivo Antitumor Efficacy
To further evaluate chemo-photo-thermal combination therapy effect against 4T1 breast cancer-bearing mouse models, we weighed the tumor weight of mice receiving various therapy regimes. In agreement with the cytotoxicity assay in vitro, it was clearly illustrated that BID-liposomes with irradiation showed the strongest inhibitory effects against 4T1 tumors among all the DOX formulations (Figure 7A). Also, free DOX, DOX-Liposomes, free ICG plus laser, and ICG-liposomes plus laser showed anti-tumor efficacy to some extend. Under the laser irradiation, free ICG and ICG-liposomes led to a comparable effect, probably because of the strong binding capacity of ICG with albumin in vivo, causing formation of similar nanoparticle and EPR effect into tumor. All the above results demonstrate an enhanced chemo-photo-thermal combination effect of BID-liposome.
FIGURE 7. In vivo chemo-photo-thermal therapy against 4T1 breast cancer-bearing mouse models. (A) Tumor weight of different groups of mice after treatments with various therapy regimes. (B) Body weight change curve of different mice. The number of mice in each group (n = 6) (mean ± SD; **p < 0.01; ns, not significant).
During the antitumor experiment, the body weight of each mouse was also monitored after administration of various drugs. In Figure 7B, free DOX causes an obvious loss of mouse body weight, mainly due to the severe side effect of DOX, such as cardiotoxicity, myelosuppression, and so on. The DOX-liposomes significantly reduces the side effects, probably due to the distribution change of liposome in vivo, avoiding the accumulation of DOX in the heart. Accordingly, all the other therapy regimes lead to a negligible change of body weight compared to phosphate buffer saline (PBS).
Conclusion
In this study, we have developed BID-liposomal nanocomposites that could simultaneously load three components of BSA, ICG, and DOX. The interactions among the drugs enable better formation of aggregates, accordingly resulting in multiple advantages of BID-liposomal nanocomposites. With the change of time, the BID-liposomal nanocomposites showed good physical stability without the precipitation and particle size increase of nanoparticles in vitro. As expected, the BID-liposomal nanocomposites showed excellent photothermal conversion under NIR irradiation and had certain stability under repeated irradiation. Moreover, BID-liposomal nanocomposites plus NIR laser irradiation show the strongest cytotoxicity among all the formulations. In breast cancer-bearing mouse models, BID-liposomes display significantly better tumor inhibition effects without obvious toxicity. Therefore, it is concluded that the BID-liposomal nanocomposites holds great promise for chemo-photo-thermal therapy of malignant tumors.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.
Author Contributions
WL and XZ are responsible for the research and design of the project. HL and FZ are responsible for specific test operation, data collection, analysis and processing, as well as manuscript writing. CZ and WA are responsible for literature collection, experimental assistance, and proofreading of manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Foundation from Science and Technology Bureau of Xinjiang production and Construction Corps (2019BC006).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Anishiya, C. D. E., Rajendran, N. K., Jeyaraj, M., Ramu, A., and Rajan, M. (2020). Retinal Photoreceptors Targeting SA-G-AA Coated Multilamellar Liposomes Carrier System for Cytotoxicity and Cellular Uptake Evaluation[J]. J. Liposome Res. 31 (2), 203–216. doi:10.1080/08982104.2020.1768111
Bönisch, N., Langan, E. A., and Terheyden, P. (2019). Kutanes Angiosarkom. Hautarzt 70 (9), 700–706. doi:10.1007/s00105-019-4462-0
Chen, J., Ding, J., Wang, Y., Cheng, J., Ji, S., Zhuang, X., et al. (2017). Sequentially Responsive Shell-Stacked Nanoparticles for Deep Penetration into Solid Tumors. Adv. Mater. 29 (32), 1701170. doi:10.1002/adma.201701170
Chen, Q., Chen, J., Yang, Z., Xu, J., Xu, L., Liang, C., et al. (2019). Nanoparticle-Enhanced Radiotherapy to Trigger Robust Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 31 (10), 1802228. doi:10.1002/adma.201802228
Chen, Y., Li, Z. H., Pan, P., Hu, J. J., Cheng, S. X., and Zhang, X. Z. (2020). Tumor‐Microenvironment‐Triggered Ion Exchange of a Metal-Organic Framework Hybrid for Multimodal Imaging and Synergistic Therapy of Tumors. Adv. Mater. 32 (24), 2001452. doi:10.1002/adma.202001452
Chen, Y., Li, Z. H., Pan, P., Hu, J. J., Cheng, S. X., and Zhang, X. Z. (2020). Tumor‐Microenvironment‐Triggered Ion Exchange of a Metal-Organic Framework Hybrid for Multimodal Imaging and Synergistic Therapy of Tumors. Adv. Mater. 32 (24), 2001452. doi:10.1002/adma.202001452
Fan, W., Yung, B., Huang, P., and Chen, X. (2017). Nanotechnology for Multimodal Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Chem. Rev. 117 (22), 13566–13638. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00258
Hao, X., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Chen, G., Wang, M., et al. (2018). Programmable Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy against Breast Cancer Guided by Multiplexed Fluorescence Imaging in the Second Near-Infrared Window. Adv. Mater. 30 (51), 1804437. doi:10.1002/adma.201804437
He, H., Liu, L., Morin, E. E., Liu, M., and Schwendeman, A. (2019). Survey of Clinical Translation of Cancer Nanomedicines-Lessons Learned from Successes and Failures. Acc. Chem. Res. 52 (9), 2445–2461. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00228
Hu, Y., Chi, C., Wang, S., Wang, L., Liang, P., Liu, F., et al. (2017). A Comparative Study of Clinical Intervention and Interventional Photothermal Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Adv. Mater. 29 (33), 1700448. doi:10.1002/adma.201700448
Huang, J., Shu, Q., Wang, L., Wu, H., Wang, A. Y., and Mao, H. (2015). Layer-by-layer Assembled Milk Protein Coated Magnetic Nanoparticle Enabled Oral Drug Delivery with High Stability in Stomach and Enzyme-Responsive Release in Small Intestine. Biomaterials 39, 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.059
Iimuro, Y. (2017). ICG Clearance Test and 99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT Fusion Images. Visc. Med. 33 (6), 449–454. doi:10.1159/000479046
Kedmi, R., Veiga, N., Ramishetti, S., Goldsmith, M., Rosenblum, D., Dammes, N., et al. (2018). A Modular Platform for Targeted RNAi Therapeutics. Nat. Nanotech 13 (3), 214–219. doi:10.1038/s41565-017-0043-5
Li, J., Yang, Y., and Huang, L. (2012). Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles with an Asymmetric Lipid Bilayer Coating for siRNA Delivery to the Tumor. J. Controlled Release 158 (1), 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.020
Li, M., Sala, V., De Santis, M. C., Cimino, J., Cappello, P., Pianca, N., et al. (2018). Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Gamma Inhibition Protects from Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity and Reduces Tumor Growth. Circulation 138 (7), 696–711. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.030352
Li, X., Lee, S., and Yoon, J. (2018). Supramolecular Photosensitizers Rejuvenate Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (4), 1174–1188. doi:10.1039/c7cs00594f
Liu, C., Zhang, S., Li, J., Wei, J., Müllen, K., and Yin, M. (2019). A Water‐Soluble, NIR‐Absorbing Quaterrylenediimide Chromophore for Photoacoustic Imaging and Efficient Photothermal Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (6), 1638–1642. doi:10.1002/anie.201810541
Liu, J., Sun, L., Li, L., Zhang, R., and Xu, Z. P. (2021). Synergistic Cancer Photochemotherapy via Layered Double Hydroxide-Based Trimodal Nanomedicine at Very Low Therapeutic Doses. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 13 (6), 7115–7126. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c23143
Liu, X., Wang, C., Ma, H., Yu, F., Hu, F., and Yuan, H. (2019). Water‐Responsive Hybrid Nanoparticles Codelivering ICG and DOX Effectively Treat Breast Cancer via Hyperthermia‐aided DOX Functionality and Drug Penetration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8 (8), 1801486. doi:10.1002/adhm.201801486
Liu, Y., Bhattarai, P., Dai, Z., and Chen, X. (2019). Photothermal Therapy and Photoacoustic Imaging via Nanotheranostics in Fighting Cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (7), 2053–2108. doi:10.1039/c8cs00618k
Luo, C., Miao, L., Zhao, Y., Musetti, S., Wang, Y., Shi, K., et al. (2016). A Novel Cationic Lipid with Intrinsic Antitumor Activity to Facilitate Gene Therapy of TRAIL DNA. Biomaterials 102, 239–248. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.030
Lyon, P. C., Gray, M. D., Mannaris, C., Folkes, L. K., Stratford, M., Campo, L., et al. (2018). Safety and Feasibility of Ultrasound-Triggered Targeted Drug Delivery of Doxorubicin from Thermosensitive Liposomes in Liver Tumours (TARDOX): a single-centre, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial. Lancet Oncol. 19 (8), 1027–1039. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30332-2
Min, Y., Roche, K. C., Tian, S., Eblan, M. J., McKinnon, K. P., Caster, J. M., et al. (2017). Antigen-capturing Nanoparticles Improve the Abscopal Effect and Cancer Immunotherapy. Nat. Nanotech 12 (9), 877–882. doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.113
Ni, Q., Zhang, F., Zhang, Y., Zhu, G., Wang, Z., Teng, Z., et al. (2018). In Situ shRNA Synthesis on DNA-Polylactide Nanoparticles to Treat Multidrug Resistant Breast Cancer. Adv. Mater. 30 (10), 1705737. doi:10.1002/adma.201705737
Opoku-Damoah, Y., Zhang, R., Ta, H. T., Amilan Jose, D., Sakla, R., and Xu, Z. P. (2021). Lipid-encapsulated Upconversion Nanoparticle for Near-Infrared Light-Mediated Carbon Monoxide Release for Cancer Gas Therapy. Eur. J. Pharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics 158, 211–221. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.11.014
Pan, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, X., Wang, H., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Antigen-Directed Fabrication of a Multifunctional Nanovaccine with Ultrahigh Antigen Loading Efficiency for Tumor Photothermal-Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 30 (8), 1704408. doi:10.1002/adma.201704408
Pan, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, X., Wang, H., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Antigen-Directed Fabrication of a Multifunctional Nanovaccine with Ultrahigh Antigen Loading Efficiency for Tumor Photothermal-Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 30 (8), 1704408. doi:10.1002/adma.201704408
Penson, R. T., Valencia, R. V., Cibula, D., Colombo, N., Leath, C. A., Bidziński, M., et al. (2020). Olaparib versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation (SOLO3): A Randomized Phase III Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 38 (11), 1164–1174. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.02745
Shan, W., Chen, R., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J., Chen, B., Zhou, X., et al. (2018). Improved Stable Indocyanine Green (ICG)-Mediated Cancer Optotheranostics with Naturalized Hepatitis B Core Particles. Adv. Mater. 30 (28), 1707567. doi:10.1002/adma.201707567
Song, Q., Zheng, C., Jia, J., Zhao, H., Feng, Q., Zhang, H., et al. (2019). A Probiotic Spore‐Based Oral Autonomous Nanoparticles Generator for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 31 (43), 1903793. doi:10.1002/adma.201903793
Xue, P., Yang, R., Sun, L., Li, Q., Zhang, L., Xu, Z., et al. (2018). Indocyanine Green-Conjugated Magnetic Prussian Blue Nanoparticles for Synchronous photo-thermal/Photodynamic Tumor Therapy[J]. Nano-Micro Lett. 10 (4), 74. doi:10.1007/s40820-018-0227-z
Yang, Y., Zhu, W., Dong, Z., Chao, Y., Xu, L., Chen, M., et al. (2017). 1D Coordination Polymer Nanofibers for Low-Temperature Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Mater. 29 (40), 1703588. doi:10.1002/adma.201703588
Keywords: functional materials, inorganic, photothermal therapy, liposome, anticancer
Citation: Liu H, Zhuang F, Zhang C, Ai W, Liu W and Zhou X (2021) Functionalized Organic–Inorganic Liposome Nanocomposites for the Effective Photo-Thermal Therapy of Breast Cancer. Front. Mater. 8:710187. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2021.710187
Received: 20 May 2021; Accepted: 29 July 2021;
Published: 14 September 2021.
Edited by:
Mingqiang Li, Sun Yat-Sen University, ChinaCopyright © 2021 Liu, Zhuang, Zhang, Ai, Liu and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wei Liu, bGl1d2VpMzM1OUBwdW1jaC5jbg==; Xukun Zhou, emhvdXh1a3VuZG9jdG9yQHNpbmEuY24=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work