POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Affairs and Policy

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1563900

This article is part of the Research TopicThe State of Knowledge from Operational Ice Service Perspectives: Previous and Future MandatesView all 12 articles

THE INTERNATIONAL ICE CHARTING WORKING GROUP THE FIRST TWENTY-FIVE YEARS

Provisionally accepted
  • International Ice Charting Working Group, Ottawa, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Since 1999, the International Ice Charting Working Group (IICWG) has successfully worked as a forum for the operational ice services and helped them to better meet the needs of their national and international maritime clients through coordination and cooperation in data sharing, standards, training, product development, and research activities. The annual meeting has proven to be a valuable opportunity for the national ice services to meet, along with their partners and clients, to share information about new research developments, implementation successes and failures, and advances in ice information products and services. This paper presents a brief overview of the first twenty-five years of the IICWG, including its raison d'être, the history of its formation, its organization, and its accomplishments.

Keywords: Seaice, Iceberg, Polar, marine, shipping

Received: 20 Jan 2025; Accepted: 06 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Falkingham. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: John Falkingham, International Ice Charting Working Group, Ottawa, Canada

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more