
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Biogeochemistry
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1562763
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Biogeochemical mineralization is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in the formation of submarine hydrothermal sulfide deposits. While several mechanisms by which hydrothermal organisms may facilitate metal deposition have been documented in many seafloor hydrothermal deposits, the potential involvement of biogenic processes in the mineralization of hydrothermal deposits in the southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge (SMAR) has been largely overlooked until now. In this study, we investigate sulfide chimney sample from the volcanic-hosted Tongguan hydrothermal field on the SMAR and present several lines of evidence for biogeochemical mineralization. Mineralogical analysis infers four types of biogenic pyrite and chalcopyrite structures: macrobiotic-related tube structures, microbial-related quasi-stromatolite, quasi-oncolite and globular structures. These biogenic structures exhibit selective enrichment of elements such as Mn, Pb, and Cu in biogenic pyrite compared to abiotic pyrite. In-situ sulfur isotope studies indicate that biogenic minerals possess lower δ 34 S values than abiotic minerals. We identified three biomineralization mechanisms: an "active" mineralization process mediated by macro-organism, a "passive" mineralization process associated with microbial mats, and a microbial assimilatory sulfate reduction process. Our research suggests that the role of biogenic processes in SMAR hydrothermal mineralization should be given further consideration.
Keywords: Biogeochemical mineralization, Southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge, sulfide, Biogenic structure, mineral chemistry, In-situ sulfur isotope
Received: 18 Jan 2025; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Shi, Li, Wang, Ye, Yan, Dang and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Bing Li, First Institute of Oceanography, Qingdao, China
Xuefa Shi, First Institute of Oceanography, Qingdao, China
Chuanshun Li, First Institute of Oceanography, Qingdao, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.