
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Megafauna
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1539143
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Continued development of offshore renewable energy is urgently needed to support the goal of achieving global Net Zero targets; however, concerns persist about impacts of construction noise on acoustically sensitive species such as the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). Population impact modelling frameworks have been proposed as a quantitative way to evaluate whether disturbance, as experienced by individual animals, might result in negative population-level consequences, and suggested as useful tools in support of Environmental Impact Assessments. However, questions remain regarding model applicability to projects of different spatial scales. This study applied two such models (iPCoD and DEPONS) to assess potential population-level impacts of construction of the East Anglia ONE wind farm on North Sea harbour porpoises. Both models were parameterised using project-specific input values underpinned by static passive acoustic monitoring data. The various iPCoD and DEPONS scenario simulations did not predict any long-term population-level impacts in response to pin-piling activities. This is likely due to discrepancy in scale between localised, short-term impacts of constructing a single wind farm in comparison to the range of the North Sea porpoise population. DEPONS modelling also revealed no long-term negative impact of pin-piling on predicted porpoise numbers within the boundary of the Southern North Sea Special Area of Conservation. Current results highlight the importance of scale when using either modelling framework to evaluate the likelihood of long-term population-level impacts on abundant, wide-ranging species from individual offshore renewables developments. Cumulative population effects from human activities, including other construction projects, commercial shipping, hydrocarbon exploitation, and fisheries bycatch, are not well understood but can be approached with the modelling frameworks explored here. However, such effects will not be apparent when applying these models to individual construction projects and in isolation from coexisting pressures. There is a risk that ignoring co-occurring pressures may result in an incomplete picture of simulated population trajectories that should be considered carefully when these models are proposed to evaluate impacts of offshore renewable construction projects. We advocate that long-term population impact modelling should be applied on a regional basis and take additional wind farm developments as well as other cumulative pressures into consideration.
Keywords: interim Population Consequences of Disturbance (iPCoD), DEPONS agent-based population model, Cumulative impact assessments, Legislative context, Conservation management, marine renewables, pin-piling, C-POD
Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 van Geel, Benjamins, Marmo, Nabe-Nielsen, Wittich, Risch, Jameson, Todd and Wilson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nienke C.F. van Geel, Department of Science, Scottish Association for Marine Science - University of the Highlands and Islands, Oban, Scotland, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.