The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 12 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1465125
Investigating Plankton Size Spectra, Biomass, Abundance, and Community Composition in the Subtropical Convergence Front in the Southern Ocean
Provisionally accepted- 1 Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
- 2 University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
- 3 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
- 4 National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand
- 5 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Gijón (IEO, CSIC), Gijón, Asturias, Spain
- 6 Center for Ocean Atmospheric Prediction Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Phytoplankton community structure is crucial to pelagic food webs and biogeochemical processes. To help understand these processes, we quantify carbon (C) based size spectra, community composition, living to total particulate organic carbon (POC) and C:Chlorophyll a (C:Chla) ratios across biogeographical provinces in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean near the Subtropical Front (Chatham Rise, Aotearoa-New Zealand). On average, subtropical-influenced waters had lower macronutrients, higher total Chla (1.1 ± 0.2 µg Chla L-1) and were dominated by nanoplankton, which accounted for 45% of the total plankton community (35.2 ± 4.6 µg C L-1). In contrast, picoplankton dominated plankton communities within the subantarctic-influenced waters within the plankton community, whichand accounted for 35% of the total plankton community (18.5 ± 0.9 µg C L-1), in these water with with higher macronutrient concentrations and lower total Chla concentrations (0.32 ± 0.06 µg Chla L-1). Subantarctic-influenced regions had steeper (more negative) slopes for the normalized biomass size spectrum slopesspectrum (average = -1.00) compared to subtropical-influenced waters (average = -0.78) indicating greater relative dominance of small taxa. The subantarctic-influenced region had ~2-fold higher surface average C:Chla ratios compared to the subtropical-influenced region with picoplankton consistently having lower C:Chla ratios, due to low Chla values, than larger nano- or microplankton. Live plankton carbon contributed a median of 67% of total particulate organic carbon in the euphotic zone (non-living detritus comprises the remaining ~1/3), which is indicative of substantial primary production and rapid recycling by a strong microbial loop. Our study provides important insights into phytoplankton community structure, biomass distribution and their contribution to carbon sequestration in this region, highlighting the important roles of nanoplankton in subtropical productive waters and picoplankton in offshore subantarctic waters as well as a strong variation of C:Chla across different phytoplankton size classes.
Keywords: Plankton biomass, plankton abundance, plankton community composition, Size specific carbon to chlorophyll ratios, Epifluorescence microscopy Field Code Changed
Received: 15 Jul 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yingling, Selph, Decima, Safi, Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Fender and Stukel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Natalia Yingling, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.