Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Deep-Sea Environments and Ecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1458014

This article is part of the Research Topic Managing Deep-sea and Open Ocean Ecosystems at Ocean Basin Scale - Volume 2 View all 10 articles

Hybrid machine learning algorithms accurately predict marine ecological communities

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2 Instituto do Mar, Campus Baixada Santista, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Sao Paulo, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Predicting ecological communities is highly challenging but necessary to establish effective conservation and monitoring programs. This study aims to predict the spatial distribution of nematode associations from 25 m to 2500 m water depth over an area of 350,000 km² and understand the major oceanographic processes influencing them. The study considered data from 245 nematode genera and 44 environmental parameters from 100 stations. Data was analyzed by means of a hybrid machine learning (ML) approach, which combines unsupervised and supervised methods. The unsupervised phase detected that the nematodes were geographically structured in six associations, each with representative genera. In the supervised stage, these associations were modeled as a function of the environmental features by five supervised algorithms (Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Stochastic Gradient Boosting), using 80% of the samples for training, leaving the remaining for testing. Among them, the random forest was the best model with an accuracy of 86.4% in the test portion. The Random Forest (RF) model recognized 8 environmental features as significant in predicting the associations. Depth, the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the water near the bottom, the quality and quantity of phytodetritus, the proportion of coarse sand and carbonate, the sediment skewness, pH, and redox potential were the most important features structuring them. The inference of each association across the whole study area was based on the modeling results of the 8 significant environmental features. This model still correctly classified 90% of test data. Such findings demonstrated that it is possible to infer the spatial distribution of the nematode associations using only a small set of environmental features. The recommendation is thus to permanently monitor these environmental variables and run the ML models. Implementing ML approaches in monitoring programs of benthic systems will increase our prediction capacity, reduce monitoring costs, and, ultimately, support the conservation of marine systems.

    Keywords: Nematodes, marine environment, artificial intelligence, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, baseline, Environmental Monitoring

    Received: 01 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Yaginuma, Gallucci, Vieira, Gheller, Brito de Jesus, Corbisier and Fonseca. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Luciana Erika Yaginuma, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more