data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1448250
This article is part of the Research Topic Antarctic Krill and Interactions in the East Antarctic Ecosystem View all 16 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The East Antarctic krill fisheries are spread across two Divisions of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), Division 58.4.1 between 80-150°E and Division 58.4.2 between 30-80°E. Each of these Divisions is further divided into East and West subregions with separate catch limits. In 2019, CCAMLR agreed to a revised krill fishery management strategy recommended by the Scientific Committee. This strategy consists of setting catch limits for Euphausia superba using three combined approaches; 1) an acoustic biomass estimate, 2) a precautionary harvest rate derived from a stock assessment and 3) a spatial allocation of catch limits based on overlap of predator needs.Using recent survey data we estimate 50% length at maturity for E. superba to be 41.67 mm and 42.29 mm for Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 respectively. In both areas females were estimated to reach 50% maturity at a smaller length than males.Using these updated estimates of E. superba length at maturity and a new implementation of the Generalized Yield Model (the Grym), we estimate precautionary harvest rates for krill in Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2-East ranging between 0.0854 -0.1201. These calculated harvest rates were then applied to the biomass estimates from recent surveys to estimate total precautionary catch limits for E.
Keywords: krill, fishery, Precautionary catch limit, Generalised yield model, Grym, CCAMLR
Received: 13 Jun 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Maschette, Wotherspoon, Murase, Kelly, Ziegler, Swadling and Kawaguchi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dale Maschette, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, College of Sciences and Engineering, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.