Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Biogeochemistry
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1521036

Biogeochemical cycling of sedimentary organic carbon and benthic nutrient fluxes in the semi-enclosed Jinhae Bay, Korea: Insights into benthic-pelagic coupling

Provisionally accepted
Sung-Uk An Sung-Uk An 1,2Jae Seong Lee Jae Seong Lee 2,3*Ju-Wook Baek Ju-Wook Baek 2,3Hyun-Jeong Jeong Hyun-Jeong Jeong 2,3Chul-In Sun Chul-In Sun 4Jin Young Choi Jin Young Choi 2,3Sokjin Hong Sokjin Hong 5Dae In Lee Dae In Lee 5Sung-Han Kim Sung-Han Kim 2,3Kyung-Tae Kim Kyung-Tae Kim 2
  • 1 Department of Ecology and Conservation, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon, Republic of Korea
  • 2 Marine Environment Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • 3 Department of Convergence Study on the Ocean Science and Technology, Ocean Science and Technology School, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • 4 Korea Marine Environment Management Corporation, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • 5 National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The mineralization of organic matter at the sediment plays a crucial role in ecosystem functioning by facilitating the biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nutrients. This process not only supports nutrient availability for primary production but also regulates the long-term storage of carbon within sediments. To understand the biogeochemical processes associated with organic matter mineralization and nutrient regeneration, we estimated total and diffusive sediment oxygen uptake rates, benthic nutrient fluxes, and organic carbon (OC) budgets at four sites in the semi-enclosed Jinhae Bay (JB). The total oxygen uptake (TOU) rates ranged from 38.4 to 49.6 mmol O2 m -2 d -1 , and diffusive oxygen uptake (DOU) rates ranged from 12.3 ± 1.8 to 15.1 ± 1.4 mmol O2 m -2 d -1 . The average ratio of TOU:DOU ranged from 3.12 to 3.28 over JB, which suggests significant benthic faunal activities in JB sediments. The vertical flux of organic carbon ranged from 45.5 ± 7.0 to 93.0 ± 25.3 mmol C m -2 d -1 , and mainly consisted of biodeposits associated with aquaculture activities. The burial flux into the sediment ranged from 3.96 ± 1.00 to 7.17 ± 1.64 mmol C m -2 d -1 , and burial efficiencies were 4.25 to 15.8%, which indicated that deposited organic carbon was either mineralized in surface sediment before burial or laterally transferred by resuspension. The benthic nutrient fluxes at four sites ranged from 1.50 to 2.07 mmol m -2 d -1 for nitrogen, from 0.02 to 0.05 mmol m -2 d -1 for phosphate, and from 6.72 to 9.11 mmol m -2 d -1 for silicate. The benthic nitrogen and phosphate fluxes accounted for 82.1 to 149% and 23.1 to 57.6%, respectively, of the required levels for primary production in the water column. Our results suggest that OC oxidation in the JB sediment may significantly contribute to the biogeochemical OC cycles and tight benthicpelagic coupling associated with nutrient regeneration.

    Keywords: total oxygen uptake, Organic carbon mineralization, Benthic nutrient flux, Organic carbon budget, Semi-enclosed bay

    Received: 01 Nov 2024; Accepted: 26 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 An, Lee, Baek, Jeong, Sun, Choi, Hong, Lee, Kim and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jae Seong Lee, Marine Environment Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.