Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Aquatic Physiology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1510780

Comparison of metabolism, gut histology, and microbiota between Schizothorax lissolabiatus and Schizothorax griseus under identical farming conditions

Provisionally accepted
Xiaowen Long Xiaowen Long 1*Chuanyan Zhong Chuanyan Zhong 1Li Chen Li Chen 1Zhengwei Huang Zhengwei Huang 1Yuan Hu Yuan Hu 1Yujie Jiang Yujie Jiang 2Jun Zhou Jun Zhou 1
  • 1 College of Agriculture and Biological Science, Dali University, Dali, China
  • 2 Dali Plateau Aquatic Resources Breeding Farm, Dali, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study explores metabolic, histological, and microbiota differences between two Schizothorax species, Schizothorax lissolabiatus and Schizothorax griseus, to support sustainable aquaculture practices. These native Chinese fish species play significant ecological and economic roles, yet there remains a limited understanding of their digestive and nutritional physiology. To address this gap, this study compares their digestive physiology, antioxidant capacity, immune response, and gut histology under identical farming conditions. Our comparative analysis reveals both shared characteristics and species-specific differences. While α-amylase and trypsin activities showed no significant differences between species, a consistent trend was observed, with enzyme activity highest in the hindgut, followed by the midgut, foregut, esophagus, and liver. In terms of specific metabolic markers, S. griseus shows higher lipase activity in the liver and foregut, as well as higher aspartate aminotransferase and catalase levels in the liver, along with an increased serum glucose content compared to S. lissolabiatus. Serum metabolomics analysis revealed 21 differentially abundant metabolites linked to glycerophospholipid metabolism, autophagy, purine metabolism, and necroptosis, reflecting distinct metabolic adaptations and nutritional needs for each species. These metabolic differences provide a basis for optimizing feed composition and aquaculture practices tailored to each species. Notably, S. lissolabiatus displays a significantly higher goblet cell count in the hindgut compared to S. griseus. Additionally, both species exhibit greater villi number, length, width, crypt depth, and muscle thickness in the esophagus than in the foregut, midgut, and hindgut. S. griseus also has a higher number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and greater microbial diversity in its intestinal microbiota, which may enhance its nutrient utilization capabilities. While both species’ dominant microbial phyla include Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, S. griseus demonstrated superior lipid digestion capabilities. Furthermore, the midgut and hindgut in both species display higher starch and protein digestive enzyme activities than other digestive tissues. These findings highlight the physiological differences between the two Schizothorax species, suggesting targeted strategies to improve health, growth, and sustainability in aquaculture.

    Keywords: Gut histology, Gut Microbiota, Metabolomics, Physiological metabolism, Schizothorax lissolabiatus, Schizothorax griseus

    Received: 13 Oct 2024; Accepted: 11 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Long, Zhong, Chen, Huang, Hu, Jiang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaowen Long, College of Agriculture and Biological Science, Dali University, Dali, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.