Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1494598
This article is part of the Research Topic Biological Invasions in Aquatic Ecosystems: Detection, Assessment and Countermeasures View all 11 articles

The Serial Dilution Culture-Most Probable Number (MPN) assay to estimate phytoplankton concentrations in ballast water: comments and improvements

Provisionally accepted
  • Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In ecology, the enumeration of living aquatic unicellular protists is a century-old complicated task. The organisms are small, perhaps motile, and if they are non-motile their vitality is hard to gauge. A respectable technique still in use today is the Serial Dilution Culture-Most Probable Number (MPN) assay that determines the total viable phytoplankton concentration from the highest sample dilutions that exhibit chlorophyll-fluorescence after incubation. However, 99% of extant phytoplankton species have not been shown to grow in MPN tubes (false-negatives) and in ballast water applications, 10-50 µm species can be outcompeted by <10 µm autotrophs in abundance, biomass, and chlorophyll-fluorescence (false-positives). In addition, it is shown that after microscopic identification, contrary to established practice, the concentration of individual species or species-groups (10-50 µm) cannot be derived from standard MPN tables. Examples of a corrected derivation are given for simple (2-3 species) assemblages, but this correction becomes increasingly difficult in more complex mixtures. The MPN assay should not be used as a quantitative method in ecological studies or in applications such as ballast water testing.

    Keywords: Serial Dilution Culture-Most Probable Number, SDC-MPN, Calculation correction, false-positives, False-negatives, Phytoplankton, Model, ballast water

    Received: 11 Sep 2024; Accepted: 11 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Peperzak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Louis Peperzak, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.