Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Biogeochemistry
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1465847

Quantifying the role of iron recycling by Adélie and Emperor penguins over the austral spring and summer in Prydz Bay

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Australian Antarctic Program Partnership (AAPP), Hobart, Australia
  • 2 Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre (ACE CRC), Hobart, Australia
  • 3 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, College of Sciences and Engineering, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  • 4 Australian Antarctic Division, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  • 5 Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In large areas of the Southern Ocean, iron limits phytoplankton production. Although biologically mediated iron recycling has been studied for the higher trophic level whales and the lower trophic level krill, less is known of the numerically abundant seabirds foraging in Antarctic waters. In this study, we estimate the magnitude of iron recycled by two Antarctic breeding seabirds, the Adélie and Emperor penguins, across the austral spring and summer in the Prydz Bay region, East Antarctica. Their contribution to iron recycling and associated pathways differs in line with their contrasting life history strategies (summer and winter breeding) and their breeding habitat (land and fast-ice). We consider their breeding cycle in relation to their terrestrial activities compared to foraging periods at sea. High iron concentration (~419 mg kg-1) in guano of both penguin species suggest that they are a source of regenerated iron. Breeding Emperor penguins supplied an average of 237 mol iron m-2 day-1 on the fast-ice that they breed on that eventually ends in the ocean when the ice melts completely in summer (November–February). During their foraging trips, the adult Emperor penguins contribute between 7x10-5 and 4x10-4 mol iron m-2 day-1, as their foraging ranges increase over the breeding season. In contrast, breeding Adélie penguins supplied between 254–1,243 mol iron m-2 day-1 while at their colony, with a fraction of guano entering the ocean via meltwater flowing into the ocean. The flux decreases to 2x10-3–6x10-2 mol iron m-2 d-1 whilst they are foraging. Our study finds that penguins redistribute a large flux of iron onto their colonies which may enter the adjacent water through sea ice melt and facilitated through katabatic winds. Despite their high abundance in Prydz Bay, the contribution of penguins to iron flux during their foraging periods is minor, due to the enormous foraging range being covered. Further research into the bioavailability of iron by marine organisms coupled with parallel measurements of seawater iron concentration and phytoplankton uptake experiments will be invaluable in refining iron budgets in both this region and other hotspots along the Antarctic coast where higher trophic level animals are abundant.

    Keywords: Iron, Recycling, seabirds, Southern Ocean, Antarctica

    Received: 17 Jul 2024; Accepted: 14 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ratnarajah, Emmerson, Southwell, Lannuzel, Townsend and Bowie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Lavenia Ratnarajah, Australian Antarctic Program Partnership (AAPP), Hobart, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.