Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1462123
This article is part of the Research Topic Biological Invasions in Aquatic Ecosystems: Detection, Assessment and Countermeasures View all 3 articles

eDNA analysis reveals high invasion risks in nature reserves in Guangdong Province, China

Provisionally accepted
Yangchun Gao Yangchun Gao 1*Yufeng Wei Yufeng Wei 1Chunyan Wu Chunyan Wu 2Saisai Zhang Saisai Zhang 3Zhiqiang Xia Zhiqiang Xia 4
  • 1 Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Science (CAS), Guangzhou, China
  • 2 Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 3 Dalian Ocean Development Affairs Service Center, Dalian, China
  • 4 China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Invasive species can cause ecological and economic damage in various areas, including nature reserves. The invasion risks of aquatic invasive vertebrates in nature reserves, however, remain unclear since this group often hides under the water and is frequently neglected in ecological surveys based on traditional methods. Environmental DNA (eDNA) provides a promising alternative way to conduct biodiversity surveys in aquatic ecosystems. Here, we collected aquatic eDNA samples from eight nature reserves in Guangdong Province, China to mainly investigate the diversity of aquatic invasive vertebrates and inform their invasion risks in these nature reserves. We detected a total of 104 aquatic vertebrate species belonging to three classes (Actinopteri, Amphibia and Reptilia), 12 orders, 32 families, and 71 genera, among which nine were invasive species (8.65% of all aquatic vertebrates detected), i.e., Coptodon zillii, Sarotherodon galilaeus, Oreochromis niloticus, Oreochromis tanganicae, Gambusia affinis, Clarias gariepinus, Chelydra serpentina, Trachemys scripta elegans, and Rana catesbeiana. Surprisingly, 55.56% of these aquatic invasive vertebrates (i.e., five species) were found in at least 75.00% samples, and both C. zillii and S. galilaeus were detected in all samples (100%), suggesting that most invasive species were widely distributed in these nature reserves. In addition, all aquatic invasive vertebrate species ranked very high (top 66 of aquatic vertebrates detected) regarding their relative abundance of sequences, and three of the top 10 species with the highest number of sequences were invasive species (i.e., C. zillii, S. galilaeus, and O. niloticus), suggesting high population size of these invasive vertebrates. Moreover, we also detected 16 endangered/threatened species (15.38% of all vertebrates detected), which demonstrated notable overlaps of geographic distribution with invasive species. The reality of high abundance, wide geographical distribution and overlaps with the endangered/threatened species indicated considerable risks of aquatic invasive vertebrates in nature reserves in Guangdong Province, which calls for urgent needs for effective management. Our study would provide fundamental insights for the formulation of effective management measures to reduce losses caused by invasive species and promote the protection of endangered/threatened species in nature reserves.

    Keywords: Nature reserves, Aquatic vertebrate species, invasive species, Invasion risk, eDNA

    Received: 09 Jul 2024; Accepted: 31 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Gao, Wei, Wu, Zhang and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yangchun Gao, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Science (CAS), Guangzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.