Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Megafauna
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1432798
This article is part of the Research Topic Assessing and Limiting the Adverse Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Development on Seabirds and Marine Mammals View all 6 articles

Going digital: challenges in monitoring marine megafauna when comparing results from visual and digital aerial surveys

Provisionally accepted
Maud Quéroué Maud Quéroué 1,2*Matthieu Authier Matthieu Authier 3Aurélien Besnard Aurélien Besnard 1Karine Heerah Karine Heerah 2
  • 1 CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France
  • 2 France Energies Marines, Plouzané, France
  • 3 Observatoire Pelagis, UAR 3462 CNRS-LRUniv, La Rochelle, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Since the first plans to develop offshore wind farms (OWFs), concerns have been raised about the impacts on marine megafauna. Today, it is required to assess these impacts over the whole lifecycle of the OWF. Before construction, initial assessments are often conducted by visual surveys, but subsequent monitoring over the lifecycle of the OWF has to be digital due to safety requirements, leading to challenges in data comparability. The aim of this study was to attempt to establish generalizable intercalibration factors for this transition between visual and digital monitoring methods. To this end, intercalibration surveys were conducted at five different sites and at different times of the year within a site, using both visual monitoring at low-altitude and digital monitoring at both low and high altitudes. We tested the potential for intercalibration of the results based on the ratio of abundance estimated from data collected by the different methods. We explored factors such as the species under study and site-specific conditions that may influence intercalibration. We computed more than 100 intercalibration factors and found that, on average, abundance estimates from digital methods were higher than those from visual methods and that flight altitude for digital monitoring did not significantly influence abundance estimates. Aside from divergent abundance estimates depending on monitoring method, the findings also revealed significant heterogeneity, only one-third of which was explained by contextual factors such as taxonomy or the sea conditions. This outcome presents a pessimistic outlook on the prospect for the intercalibration of results between an initial assessment carried out with visual observations and subsequent monitoring with digital methods after OWF construction and until decommissioning. The high heterogeneity prevents seamless transferability of intercalibration factors and highlights the importance of local context.

    Keywords: Digital surveys, visual surveys, seabirds, Small cetaceans, Impact assessment surveys, Offshore wind farms

    Received: 14 May 2024; Accepted: 02 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Quéroué, Authier, Besnard and Heerah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Maud Quéroué, CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.